2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHeads up. New meme from Clinton camp
Bernie is repetitive and approaching "Rubiobot" level. Reading on debate performance I have read this on several different sites. I'm almost sure it's something Clinton camp sent to reporters and I expect the media to push it to see if it gains traction.
They fail to see that this is not t.v. show where you have to come up with new material every week. The issues and solutions are the same and pretty simple and Bernie is the only one speaking to it. Fact they can compare that empty suit to Bernie who is not afraid of media or answering questions is ridiculous (can you imagine Hillary taking calls from radio callers 1hr per week?).
SHRED
(28,136 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)The broken record has been 100% right for the last 50 years on a lot of very important issues (obviously not all of them, but many of them). Thankfully we are entering a new era with the Internet where people can judge for themselves instead of allowing the media to spin everything. The Internet allows you to go back through history and see if the candidate has been consistent.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Thav
(946 posts)It's a consistent message.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)kcjohn1
(751 posts)It's not because he can't speak beyond talking points like Rubio. He wants to get his message across. The message is simple and true & doesn't require much convincing. He just has to make sure people here it.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)about it, not the Clinton camp.
NanceGreggs
(27,817 posts)... the repetitiveness of someone who's been using the same talking points for decades.
"I'm almost sure it's something Clinton camp sent to reporters ..."
Yeah, I'm sure you're "almost sure". It's undoubtedly part of the nation-wide conspiracy against Bernie - because isn't everything?
"They fail to see that this is not t.v. show where you have to come up with new material every week."
Every week? No. Every decade or so, yeah.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)Clinton campaign sends talking points? Just consequences that several media organizations try to use the Rubio thing against Sanders?
Please read this article and tell me Clinton camp is above pushing agendas to reporters. I'm pretty sure Sanders campaign sends talking points to as well. It's just failure on our media when they just repeat it.
http://gawker.com/this-is-how-hillary-clinton-gets-the-coverage-she-wants-1758019058
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)for fucks sake, when will these CTs end?
NanceGreggs
(27,817 posts)... when HRC is declared the nominee. We'll be hearing/reading about the CTs that thwarted Bernie's bid for the nomination for many, many months to come.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)politics at my tree trimming (which I prefer to shelve in favor of a bacchanal) and scolded him, "no Bernie, no chemtrails!"
LOL. Timing is everything. Politicking at my holiday parties is only okay of they are Oct 31st!
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)That's why people want to hear it over and over and over and over.
It's the forbidden truth and it's just such a relief to hear it.
So rarely talked about in recent years that it sounds new.
And note that until something is done to change the greed and bad governance and the wrongs that Bernie repeatedly describes, people are going to keep listening and listening.
The number of people listening over and over to what Bernie says again and again is growing. There is pent-up demand for Bernie's honesty.
Bernie, keep telling us the truth. Let's do something to change these wrongs that have been going on for so long so that you can talk about something new.
I think that when the problems he is describing no longer exist, Bernie will tell us something else.
Hillary must like what Bernie is repeating because she is beginning to sound more and more like Bernie with each new day.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)I think the Clinton messaging tactics are distributed to the MSM first, and they filter down to the Intertube flacks.
So, we should be graced many OPs with this theme by Friday morning.
jillan
(39,451 posts)mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)Why should he change now?
Anyway, this isn't about Sanders anyway, which he'll be the first to tell you.
Did the Israelite pundits criticise John the Baptist for repeating the same sermons? Of course not.
Herod did kill John to get into Salome's panties but that's another story.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Have to make your point with the vast majority of occasional viewers, not with the political junkies.
frylock
(34,825 posts)BainsBane
(53,057 posts)I've watched maybe 9 or 10 debates and forums with Sanders and he has said pretty much the same thing every time, remarkably without flushing out his policy positions.
I expect thousands of people around America had the same reaction. Some things are just obvious.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)This is not policy forum. He has couple of minutes to explain complex policies. You elect on vision and policy formation comes after.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)They're not making fun of Rubio for being consistent on the issues, as Bernie is, but for actually repeating the same sentence/phrase over and over again within minutes. And one devoid of any substance at that.
Check this out:
.
merrily
(45,251 posts)same things happen in two different campaigns, with two different staffs, at what point do the principals say, maybe it's us.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Err... Maybe I don't remember because he hadn't talked about it and "repeated" it amongst everything else that he "repeated"?
I do remember her again mentioning like she noted last debate that she was not just going to criticize banks but criticize other entities such as Countrywide that she mentioned again, even though Countrywide is now owned by a bank (Bank of America). Which kind of supports Bernie's contention that the banks have been allowed to get bigger and closer to being too big to fail.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)last debate and I believe in her book very good book, by the way in her
book and in this last debate, she talked about getting the approval or the support
or the mentoring of Henry Kissinger. Now, I find it rather amazing, because I
happen to believe that Henry Kissinger was one of the most destructive
secretaries of state in the modern history of this country.
(APPLAUSE)
I am proud to say that Henry Kissinger is not my friend. I will not take advice from
Henry Kissinger. And in fact, Kissingers actions in Cambodia, when the United
States bombed that country, overthrew Prince Sihanouk, created the instabilityor Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge to come in, who then butchered some 3 million
innocent people, one of the worst genocides in the history of the world. So count
me in as somebody who will not be listening to Henry Kissinger.
(APPLAUSE)
IFILL: Secretary Clinton? CLINTON: Well, I know journalists have asked who
you do listen to on foreign policy, and we have yet to know who that is.
SANDERS: Well, it aint Henry Kissinger. Thats for sure.
CLINTON: Thats fine. Thats fine.
(LAUGHTER)
You know, I listen to a wide variety of voices that have expertise in various areas.
I think it is fair to say, whatever the complaints that you want to make about him
are, that with respect to China, one of the most challenging relationships we
have, his opening up China and his ongoing relationships with the leaders of
China is an incredibly useful relationship for the United States of America.
(APPLAUSE)
So if we want to pick and choose and I certainly do people I listen to, people
I dont listen to, people I listen to for certain areas, then I think we have to be fair
and look at the entire world, because its a big, complicated world out there.
SANDERS: It is.
CLINTON: And, yes, people we may disagree with on a number of things may
have some insight, may have some relationships that are important for the
president to understand in order to best protect the United States.
(APPLAUSE)
SANDERS: I find I mean, its just a very different, you know, historical
perspective here. Kissinger was one of those people during the Vietnam era who
talked about the domino theory. Not everybody remembers that. You do. I do.
The domino theory, you know, if Vietnam goes, China, da, da, da, da, da, da, da.
Thats what he talked about, the great threat of China.
And then, after the war, this is the guy who, in fact, yes, youre right, he opened
up relations with China, and now pushed various type of trade agreements,
resulting in American workers losing their jobs as corporations moved to China.
The terrible, authoritarian, Communist dictatorship he warned us about, now hes
urging companies to shut down and move to China. Not my kind of guy.
(APPLAUSE)
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... like Countrywide where you'd have to go after Bank of America (a BANK!) now to go after them.
And the bankster migration/consolidation in to "too big to jail" firms helped what was left of Countrywide in BofA package those bad loans in to bad funds that people were betting against with speculative trading on options that has come about with these banks getting too big.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)I wish that Sanders would say that he agrees with her proposed regulations but ALSO wants to break up the biggest banks.
Then she couldn't claim to be tougher on Wall Street.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Used to be a lot of other names for it.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)that must be what confused them.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)I forget who it was, Gergen or Begala IIRC.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)joshcryer
(62,276 posts)And several sites are hanging on Clinton's last words saying she wasn't a "single issue candidate."
This will surely backfire.
lob1
(3,820 posts)Is she seriously saying Bernie is a one issue candidate? Really?
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)It's going to backfire big time. It was dropped in there as a tidbit at the end of her speech, literally her last few sentences, she purposefully did it and was told to do it by her coaching team in all probability.
lob1
(3,820 posts)changing everything could be considered one issue.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)If she called Sanders a "single issue candidate" in her campaign speeches, it would be false, but less obviously false than at the end of a debate.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)Bernie-bot is already used.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)tblue37
(65,483 posts)Last edited Fri Feb 12, 2016, 09:27 AM - Edit history (1)
and repeat jihad endlessly.
BTW, he also needs to reach new viwers who have not heard his mesaage before.
NJCher
(35,723 posts)As any advertising person will tell you.
Cher
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)So there are a whole lot of people--most people in our country--who don't even know his name yet, or just learned it, and know nothing of what he has to say. It is a BRILLIANT campaign strategy to have recognized that this is what the Corporate Media would do, and to PREPARE for it, with a simple and repeated list of policy goals and clear statements such as "a rigged economy" and "corrupt campaign contribution system"--things that people NEVER HEAR now, and haven't heard for decades, but that they will instantly recognize as true and as related to their own lives and experience.
We who noticed Sanders early on, and soon started supporting him, of course may get tired of repeated statements--although most of them don't tire me at all, I'm so amazed to be hearing them. (It's like I need to re-check that a U.S. politician is actually saying these things--did I hear that right?) But yeah, if you're a policy wonk and/or a DU member, I can understand "message fatigue." But then he throws in zingers like he did tonight--for instance, his Kissinger statements--that make you realize what a great debater he is, and, once he gets his message clearly out there, how great he is going to be in future debates and speeches. This is one very smart man and he has a whole lot to say.
Sanders is only very recently getting Corporate news coverage, and even then, it's an afterthought after the Trump headline, never about substance, and often just a "horse race" article or broadcast. I have never, since the Iraq War, seen such utterly disreputable journalism! The man didn't just beat Hillary in New Hampshire, he blew her away--and then raised $7 million in tiny donations in 18 hours! He is a phenomenon!
You wouldn't know that, and you wouldn't have much sense of what he had to say, even now, even if you paid some attention to the news, if you get all your news from the Corporate Media. That is changing (via the internet) but it's still true of a lot of people, especially older people and poor people who may not have much access to the internet. But when Bernie comes to town, and draws a crowd of 10,000 or 20,000, and goes on local media, and talks to people, and after more debates, and when the Corporate Media can't avoid presenting some substance any more from Bernie, they are, for the most part, going to be blown away by what he has to say BECAUSE THEY ARE HEARING IT FOR THE FIRST TIME.
Whoever thought this out is a political genius.
senz
(11,945 posts)pitting Bernie against either Obama or Ted Kennedy. She just lit right up during those spiels. Odd, since these moments happened to be her lowest and ugliest.
When she speaks in a "compassionate" vein about suffering people, she sounds rote and memorized, sort of dutifully hammering it out.
I find myself feeling increasingly sorry for her family.
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)I'll take steady hand at the rudder than spastic reactionary to the blowing of breezes
onecaliberal
(32,894 posts)Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)He said the same sentence about 5 times within a minute or two. And he's terrible in his performance/delivery.
It's so far from the same thing you'd think whoever is floating that would understand that it is only going to make them look like an idiot.
.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Hillary has all kinds of psyops going on. The kitchen sink strategy is in progress. Nothing she does surprises me.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)All I can say is: it is worthy of a Third Way candidate.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I saw several missed opportunities.
When they were talking about limits to Big Government, Bernie mumbled something about favoring efficient government.
I was thinking "Bernie. Point out your record in Burlington, where even Republicans admitted that you cut the budget, while offering a high level of services."
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Bwahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why won't Bernie change his message? Why won't he just shut up? Why won't he just drop out?
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Hillary's is Vote for Me because I'm ME & I will 'get things done.' (Just not what you want, that would be unrealistic.)
Not exactly inspiring.
eilen
(4,950 posts)which to me, was a pretty wishy washy message.
Bernie wants everyone to have healthcare as a right, access to higher education (in which cost is not a barrier), a liveable /minimum wage, and to get our infrastructure repaired (provide jobs doing it) and invest in our communities.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Staying on message is so damn boring. Oligarchy this and right to healthcare that! Nobody wants to hear about that tired stuff again!
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)He was repetitive and unresponsive.
Stump speech, yadda, yadda, yadda...
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...and it failed. Then they briefly compared him to Cruz...and it failed. Now they're comparing him to Rubio...it will also fail. It's insulting and foolish, especially when you look at his history of being on the right side of issues and his consideration for the consequences of our actions in the world.
Akamai
(1,779 posts)Well, by such a standard, Trump is wonderful.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Didn't get traction the last time bscause it doesn't really have any teeth. Won't this time either. The rich entrenched establishment pigs are desperate to keep the feeding frenzy going at the trough.
Bernie is the first real threat to that in decades.
Fuck 'em.
Feel the Bern neoliberal scum.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Bernie's Internet army is on it!
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE