Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWall Street trader exposes Clinton "talk" about reforming Wall Street.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/28/hillary-clinton-wall-street-bailoutI owe almost my entire Wall Street career to the Clintons. I am not alone; most bankers owe their careers, and their wealth, to them. Over the last 25 years they with the Clintons it is never just Bill or Hillary implemented policies that placed Wall Street at the center of the Democratic economic agenda, turning it from a party against Wall Street to a party of Wall Street.
That is why when I recently went to see Hillary Clinton campaign for president and speak about reforming Wall Street I was skeptical. What I heard hasnt changed that skepticism. The policies she offers are mid-course corrections. In the Clintons world, Wall Street stays at the center, economically and politically. Given Wall Streets power and influence, that is a dangerous place to leave them.
Salomon Brothers hired me in 1993, seven months after President Bill Clintons inauguration. Getting a job had been easy, Wall Street was booming from deregulation that had begun under Reagan and was continuing under Clinton.
Hillary Clinton: my speeches for Wall Street haven't led to conflict of interest
Read more
When Bill Clinton ran for office, he offered up him and Hillary (Two for the price of one) as New Democrats, embracing an image of being tough on crime, but not on business. Despite the campaign rhetoric, nobody on the trading floor I joined had voted for the Clintons or trusted them.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1058 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wall Street trader exposes Clinton "talk" about reforming Wall Street. (Original Post)
grasswire
Feb 2016
OP
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)1. Whatever...
GO HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)2. Issues be damned
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)3. Wanda Wallstreet will ever serve and protect her owners.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)5. My eyes are as wide as saucers.
From The Guardian:
...
Money was fleeing Mexico, and much of it was coming back through me and my firm. Selling investors Mexican bonds was my first job on Wall Street, and now they were trying to sell them back to us. But we hadnt just sold Mexican bonds to clients, instead we did it using new derivatives product to get around regulatory issues and take advantages of tax rules, and lend the clients money. Given how aggressive we were, and how profitable it was for us, older traders kept expecting to be stopped by regulators from the new administration, but that didnt happen.
When Mexico started to collapse, the shudders began. Initially our firm lost only tens of millions, a large loss but not catastrophic. The crisis however was worsening, and Mexico was headed towards a default, or closing its border to money flows. We stood to lose hundreds of millions, something we might not have survived. Other Wall Street firms were in worse shape, having done the trade in a much bigger size. The biggest was rumored to be Lehman, which stood to lose billions, a loss they couldnt have survived.
As the crisis unfolded, senior management traveled to DC as part of a group of bankers to meet with Treasury officials. They had hoped to meet with Rubin, who was now Treasury secretary. Instead they met with the undersecretary for international affairs who my boss described as: Some young egghead academic who likes himself a lot and is wide eyed with a taste of power. That egghead was Larry Summers who would succeed Rubin as Treasury Secretary.
To the surprise of Wall Street, the administration pushed for a $50bn global bail-out of Mexico, arguing that to not do so would devastate the US and world economy. Unmentioned was that it would have also devastated Wall Street banks.
CONTINUED...
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/28/hillary-clinton-wall-street-bailout
Thanks for the heads-up, grasswire: Confessions of a Bankster.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)6. yeah, interesting stuff
The depth of the perfidy still shocks.