Well, it wasn't Hillary either. So, there.

When you attack Sanders with the Hillary campaign smear du jour, it usually involves some issue where Hillary has an even worse REAL problem. You can't attack Bernie for something and not expect Bernie's supporters to counter with an example of Hillary's failure in the same area you are attacking Bernie.

isnt that what you expect of Bernie?

That way tomorrow we can discuss important matters

Perspective

I guess it all comes down to what the individual voter values most. But it answers your question; if Bernie is better on more issues, he probably makes the best choice for the most number of people. It's just cold hard math.

it is zero sum. There can and will be only one winner of the Democratic nomination process.

It's point and counterpoint. Slinging mud, some sticks, some splashes back even worse.

And in my opinion, it's a horrible way to choose a President.

We were supposed to discuss black issues not old photos.

It's a needless distraction.

And you're a fighter, so even those who disagree with you respect you. Keep your head up!
*heh, thought you said sucks to *be* me. I'm'a leave it though. Much respect, bravenak.

Outside of DU, on everything from Facebook to LTE's, It's being noted and commented on. Fascinating from a sociological and anthropology standpoint, as well as a psychological one I would imagine.

Really, it kinda stresses me out in conversation because it goes in circles.

It's like if you shout "BERNIE" and the echo comes back as "HILLARY" "HILLARY" "HILLARY" "HILLARY" "DAVID BROCK."

It makes conversation impossible

No matter what questions I ask about BS - especially what he knew about his campaign accessing HRC's computer data, posing as union members, unauthorized use of organizations' logos - the answer is always But what about HER!?!"

I think a lot of them know at this point that making HRC look bad is the only way to make Bernie look good.

placing themselves front and center on the world stage, in the line of fire and never shying away from it. Through the decades of that career that person has come to work with a multitude of people from all walks of life, and from different perspectives. When a person is actually trying, pushing, changing, that person will make mistakes, reassess, grow. And in that career, one will gain a plethora of allies, and of enemies--for if one is really putting themselves out there and pushing, mistakes and enemies come with the successes and allies.

If, on the other hand, you retreat to a safe cloister for the bulk of your political career--where you can burnish your purity of principle and never put it forth to have it challenged beyond the weekly phone calls of fans to a radio show--it is easy to emerge from your cloister unscathed to ride the coattails of discontent and claim unwavering principles and baby-soft skin.

with the same issue

Why not judge them separately?

There's this straw man that we think he's perfect in every way. We don't think that. He's got some flaws. But he'd make an excellent President, and Hillary does poorly in comparison.

her record and her policy plans are very impressive.

Too hawkish, too pro free trade, too 3rd way, too triangulating, too friendly with Wall Street.