Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 10:28 AM Feb 2016

Clinton’s Exaggerated Wall Street Claim

February 11, 2016

Hillary Clinton exaggerated when she claimed Bernie Sanders “took about $200,000 from Wall Street firms” through the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. The DSCC did provide about $200,000 to support Sanders’ 2006 Senate race, but a relatively small percentage of the DSCC’s contributions came from “Wall Street.”

In fact, the DSCC’s largest single contributor that year was Friends of Hillary — which was Clinton’s Senate campaign.

Clinton has been criticized by Sanders for accepting large donations and speaking fees from financial companies. In response, Clinton has said the donations have not influenced her decisions — which was the point she made at an event at Manchester Community College in New Hampshire a day before that state’s primary (see the 45:40 mark):

Clinton, Feb. 8: Senator Sanders took about $200,000 from Wall Street firms. Not directly but through the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee. You know, there was nothing wrong with that. It hasn’t changed his view. Well, it didn’t change my view or my vote either.

The DSCC did support Sanders, as Clinton says. In 2006, then Rep. Sanders defeated Republican Richard Tarrant to win the U.S. Senate seat vacated by the retiring Sen. Jim Jeffords of Vermont. Although he ran as an independent, Sanders was backed by the state Democratic Party and supported by both the state and national Democratic committees.

During the 2006 campaign, the DSCC gave $37,300 to the Sanders campaign and spent an additional $60,000 supporting him in campaign advertising. It also gave $110,000 to the Vermont Democratic Party to help Sanders, making eight separate committee transfers (the last coming on Oct. 4, 2006).

That adds up to $207,300 — a little more than the $200,000 claimed by Clinton.

However, Wall Street of course wasn’t the sole source of the DSCC’s money in 2006. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the DSCC raised $121.4 million in the 2006 campaign cycle and roughly $10 million of that came from what the center defines as “Wall Street.” (That would include donations from the political action committees and employees of companies in two industries: securities and investment, and commercial banks.) That’s a little more than 8 percent in Wall Street money.

in full: http://www.factcheck.org/2016/02/clintons-exaggerated-wall-street-claim/

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton’s Exaggerated Wall Street Claim (Original Post) Jefferson23 Feb 2016 OP
It's just the usual Clinton dishonesty and smear tactic. BillZBubb Feb 2016 #1
She likes to blame the right wingers for her low trustworthy ratings, someone over there Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #2
I'm probably as far from the GOP as I could be ideologically... Yurovsky Feb 2016 #3
If we did not have such a corrupt system, the field of Dem candidates would have Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #5
Clinton claims DSCC is tainted by Wall Street? Kip Humphrey Feb 2016 #4
Nope, the article doesn't put up all of Clinton's claim in order to set up a strawman and pick nic.. uponit7771 Feb 2016 #7
200,000 or 2 dollars makes no difference, this is ANOTHER example of Sander failing HIS purity test uponit7771 Feb 2016 #6
One candiate thrives on WS money, one did not then and does not now. Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #8
Another strawman, Sanders paints everyone who's taken a red sent from Wall Street as ... uponit7771 Feb 2016 #9
Yep, you have a choice but she has much more than a red cent, good luck. Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #10
But so does 99% of the other guys, and who is claiming wall street is the dirtiest bastards around uponit7771 Feb 2016 #11
He can take it, he is a strong guy and please keep in mind WS is connected to everything regarding Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #12
No he can't !!! I was VERY VERY disappointed the other night during the debates when I heard ... uponit7771 Feb 2016 #13
I can't tell you how to listen, I can only point out Bernie is not backing down Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #14
I agree, Sanders should SAY its not about Obama with all the criticisms and stop trying to cling to uponit7771 Feb 2016 #15
Your candidate, not Obama, nor Bernie get to write Obama's legacy. Your candidate is as cynical Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #16

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
1. It's just the usual Clinton dishonesty and smear tactic.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 10:32 AM
Feb 2016

She's grasping at straws trying to negate one of her biggest handicaps. Nobody with any sense is buying it.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
2. She likes to blame the right wingers for her low trustworthy ratings, someone over there
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 10:35 AM
Feb 2016

needs to give her a wake up call. Those ratings are among Democrats and Independents.

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
3. I'm probably as far from the GOP as I could be ideologically...
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 10:37 AM
Feb 2016

my distrust of her has NOTHING to do with the GOP, and EVERYTHING to do with HRC and her actions and behaviors.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
5. If we did not have such a corrupt system, the field of Dem candidates would have
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 10:43 AM
Feb 2016

been a healthy one, we don't due to the Clinton machine of money.

They're a politically powerful couple, obviously they imagine they can
buy credibility too. It's not happening, so they attack, and smear some more.



uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
7. Nope, the article doesn't put up all of Clinton's claim in order to set up a strawman and pick nic..
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 10:47 AM
Feb 2016

...off of the amount as if that was her main point.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
8. One candiate thrives on WS money, one did not then and does not now.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 10:48 AM
Feb 2016

You get to pick, it's not hard for some. Throw in her Iraq war vote and Kissinger
and the choice gets even easier, I think.

Bernie Sanders for POTUS

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
9. Another strawman, Sanders paints everyone who's taken a red sent from Wall Street as ...
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 10:52 AM
Feb 2016

... a direct descendant of Lucifer... he doesn't distinguish what you did

Until we find out that not only does he lobby for money from the same place these devils do but he takes some of the money too.

Throw in Sanders gun stance (not just one vote) and his embrace of racilzed bomb throwers like Cornell West and my choice gets even easier too ... I think

Hillary Clinton for POTUS.. Cause she's not claiming her crap doesn't stink**

** I don't know if that helps but I just pictured an ad spot saying this and it was pretty funny

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
10. Yep, you have a choice but she has much more than a red cent, good luck.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 10:57 AM
Feb 2016

I would say, she should not do that ad, but that is funny. lol

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
11. But so does 99% of the other guys, and who is claiming wall street is the dirtiest bastards around
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 11:01 AM
Feb 2016

.... when there's big oil and others horrid industries that have hurt Americans that Sanders could've taken money from?

That the thing with Sanders purity claims via pointing at everyone else... eventually the fingers gets pointed back at him

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
12. He can take it, he is a strong guy and please keep in mind WS is connected to everything regarding
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 11:07 AM
Feb 2016

the economy, trade deals, oil, foreign policies, weapons deals.

Corruption becomes entangled within our society in numerous ways and
means...it was 3 Democrats that prevented Obama's gun legislation
after Newtown. This is not just a Republican problem, far from it.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
13. No he can't !!! I was VERY VERY disappointed the other night during the debates when I heard ...
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 11:13 AM
Feb 2016

... Sanders claim there was JUST some criticisms about Obama

They weren't, Sanders wants a "course correction" (his words) from the Obama legacy and Clinton wants to continue it.... Sanders has been a consummate Obama basher for the last 3 years and everyone on here knows it.

Sanders isn't willing to tell whole swaths of PoC voters from the SEC states this cause HE knows this will be rejected outright....

If "he can take it" then he would be standing up for what he's said about Obama so far.

Sanders voted for the CFMA, if wall street was so aweful why give them that great and wonderful gift of deregulating derivative trading?!

Sanders can't pass his own purity test... even on authenticty

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
14. I can't tell you how to listen, I can only point out Bernie is not backing down
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 11:24 AM
Feb 2016

and his campaign is not about Obama, nor should it be.

Maybe you're forgetting WHAT obstacles were before Obama
and his agenda..what makes the Republicans so in the bag for
corporations? Why did 3 Democrats vote no on Obama's gun
legislation after Newtown?

The extension of power the NRA has led to stand your ground laws, WHO
is on the receiving end of those laws and dies? That is only ONE
example, there are thousands of them. So please don't discuss this
as if this revolt is only about jobs and money..it is NOT.

Bernie Sanders is going after the main culprit, if we don't we will
not have a functioning democracy.

Sanders authenticity is not an issue, I suggest you look at the
exit polls from NH on trustworthiness..your candidate has a serious
problem.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
15. I agree, Sanders should SAY its not about Obama with all the criticisms and stop trying to cling to
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 10:34 PM
Feb 2016

... Obama or his legacy ANY WAY now.

Go ahead and let people know Obama should have been primaried and that he's weak and rightward...

Sanders campaign is about course change from Obama, a revolution against the status quo which includes Obama

Sanders authenticity IS an issue, he's not being such now because opposing Obama in front of the SEC states would sink him fast...

seeing the last polls I don't thing he needs any more wrong steps

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
16. Your candidate, not Obama, nor Bernie get to write Obama's legacy. Your candidate is as cynical
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:34 AM
Feb 2016

in her call out to SC voters as one can be. Sanders has both praised and admonished Obama on policy
and he has never claimed otherwise. Are you aware of how many Democratic Senators called out Obama
on the public option at the time and pointed their finger at him in a very public manner? They have every
right to do so and if voters in SC don't like it, they can refuse to vote for Bernie..he is not going to change
his message and lie.

Bernie Sanders Talks Up Primary Challenge to Obama as ‘a Good Idea for Our Democracy and for the Democratic Party’

August 2011

http://www.thenation.com/article/bernie-sanders-talks-primary-challenge-obama-good-idea-our-democracy-and-democratic-part/

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton’s Exaggerated Wal...