Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Alfresco

(1,698 posts)
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 12:18 PM Feb 2016

Coin flips? In Nevada, democratic caucus ties are luck of the draw.

http://www.rgj.com/story/news/politics/2016/02/12/coin-flips-nevada-democratic-caucus-ties-luck-draw/80297068/


Seth A. Richardson, srichardson@rgj.com February 12, 2016

If the Iowa Democratic caucuses showed the country one thing, it’s that sometimes it does come down to a coin flip.

Six precincts that needed some form of tie breaker resulted in a coin flip to determine who was awarded the contested delegate. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton won all six of the match-ups against Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

The tiebreakers did not affect Clinton’s eventual victory even with the slim margin, but the seemingly arbitrary rules made national news.

However, the Nevada Democratic caucus has a similar system, only with a process more appropriate to a state with a heavy casino industry: a card draw.

The draw only happens when a delegate needs to be awarded for one candidate or the other. A memo from the state party lays out the rules.

The party provides an unopened deck of playing cards. The deck should be shuffled seven times. A representative from each campaign picks a single card. The high card wins. In cases of cards of the same rank, the card suit controls the outcome with spades being the highest followed by hearts, diamonds and clubs.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Coin flips? In Nevada, democratic caucus ties are luck of the draw. (Original Post) Alfresco Feb 2016 OP
Personally, I prefer primary elections to BlueMTexpat Feb 2016 #1
Me too bigwillq Feb 2016 #2
You hit the nail on the head! BlueMTexpat Feb 2016 #4
I agree. I hope for rotating first state primaries with paper ballots. Alfresco Feb 2016 #5
That sounds foolproof in Nevada.. speaktruthtopower Feb 2016 #3

BlueMTexpat

(15,369 posts)
1. Personally, I prefer primary elections to
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 12:21 PM
Feb 2016

caucuses. I wish that all states had primary elections. But we deal with what we must.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
2. Me too
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 12:23 PM
Feb 2016

I like that my state (CT) is a primary state. I probably wouldn't be able to vote if I lived in a caucus state. I work second shift and on weekends.

BlueMTexpat

(15,369 posts)
4. You hit the nail on the head!
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 12:27 PM
Feb 2016


Caucuses take up a lot of time, require one's physical presence throughout the procedure, and there is no flexibility with dates.

My US residence is in MD. It has a closed Dem primary and early voting is allowed. That is the way to ensure that more voters are able to participate in the Democratic Party process, provided of course that they are registered as Dems.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Coin flips? In Nevada, de...