Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 830 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sad. Gap in enthusiam between the two parties (Original Post)
question everything
Feb 2016
OP
So much for Sanders' "revolution" if he can't increase the turnout necessary for said revolution.
Metric System
Feb 2016
#3
All of it is Trump, for Repubs. You think there'd be enthusiasm for Ted Cruz and
TwilightGardener
Feb 2016
#4
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)1. Trump is likely to be president. I expect Hillary vs the Donald.
cali
(114,904 posts)6. He is unlikely to be the nominee.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)7. Oh I completely disagree with you.
Unless the GOP establishment takes it from him.
cali
(114,904 posts)10. They will. It'll be either Rubio or Kasich
Both scare me much more than trump
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)11. Trump will run Third party and take 25% of the vote.
That would guarantee a Clinton victory.
randys1
(16,286 posts)2. Given the GOP has built in mechanisms to steal 4% of the national vote in every
presidential election, meaning the Dems have to win by far more than a majority, this is troubling.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)3. So much for Sanders' "revolution" if he can't increase the turnout necessary for said revolution.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)8. So far it appears no one is excited for Hillary.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)4. All of it is Trump, for Repubs. You think there'd be enthusiasm for Ted Cruz and
Bush and Christie? No. Repubs like their celebrity clowns, it gets them jazzed--combine that with 8 years out of the WH, they're just more determined.
Squinch
(50,955 posts)5. That's pretty weird, given it's a revolution and all.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)9. Heck of a job, DWS!!!! nt
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)12. That's inevitably what inevitable mandates (no choice) do
Not many people enthusiastically endorse even having their favorite beverage forced down their throats