Then vote for the Democratic nominee

Or if Hillary provides her transcripts.

Not one is wrong and no two are exactly the same. Instead of arguing we can be listeing and learning.

How do we not "lose" if we support a candidate who claims that only minor tweaks are needed to correct the situation?

We tried this in 2008. We fell for "change" that really wasn't. We should not do that again.

But sometimes folks don't appreciate what they have until it's gone. Then they scratch their behinds trying to figure out what happened?

unless Bernie Sanders is nominated and elected.

Hillary Clinton is a big step backwards. The republicans would be a ginormous step backwards.

That said, Obama has fallen way short of the expectations he created for himself.

Yes, a 'hell of a lot better.'

Even if you don't think so!

You didn't elect the Magic Negro! So sorry!

If we cannot unite as a party behind our nominee, and get out the vote, Lord knows what the Supreme Court will look like in 4 years time. The first thing they do is repeal ACA, then dismantle any changes President Obama was able to get through. What they REALLY want is complete control of the Supreme Court and we are going to give that to them with a big red bow on top.

We need to fight the other party not each other. Both candidates are very strong, either one would be a great President and would fight to keep the Republicans from killing our country.

All this bullshit about the divisiveness of the primary is coming from Hillary supporters angry that we refuse to crown Queen Hillary.

in my post. Funny that you read something into it that wasn't there. Both sides are guilty, in my opinion.

The Establishment has been attacking progressives as "divisive" for a long time.

You do not know me at all.

That is why we have primaries and caucuses, to give people a CHOICE about who is going to be the party nominee. The sneering about "divisiveness" almost always comes from the party Establishment in their smoke-filled rooms worried that people are not going to support their anointed candidate. it is scaremongering people into supporting the Establishment candidate by insinuating that primary contests weakens the party and will allow the other party to win.

just the berniebros...there are some nice bernie people out there....and bernie likes HRC....so only the immature ones throuwing tempertantrums

don't exist...if there are men throwing temper tantrums they are either bernie bros or they are voting for trump ...they need a shoulder to cry on.....and HRC is busy

life, not the friend and advisor of one of the DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES!

FFS!

He's irrelevant and too ancient.

also irrelevant?

I look at things simply. Please forgive my lack of nuance in this matter. Thank you.

In a recent thread even Skinner has admitted he fell for a Swiftboat lie against Bernie Sanders because he wasn't paying strict attention.

His whine was "I was busy and the mainstream media tricked me".

I saw plenty of people here pushing that lie for everything they could.

to demand that we come together to defeat the Republicans... I love Bernie! it's his supporters that worry me

At that point, it's time for us to use our energies to support candidates for local and state offices who share our values - and to build up for the midterm elections by early support of House and Senate candidates who share our values.

Come January 2017 - it's back to the ground game.

And fighting among ourselves is not really quite the same thing as voting for a Republican, is it?

As we struggle to put out best candidate forward we are strengthening our position, not weakening it.

Guess that makes it sorta impossible, huh?

It does not matter which party affiliation they have.