Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Axelrod- "Scalia's death is a seismic event." (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 OP
It is. JRLeft Feb 2016 #1
it is. and interestingly enough, i found this nugget restorefreedom Feb 2016 #2
And most likely why it will be fought until after the GE. Lucinda Feb 2016 #4
That's correct. avaistheone1 Feb 2016 #5
Timeline... give Obama a month to pick a dignified candidate Bucky Feb 2016 #8
I thought it's traditional to wait 3 months for a senate hearing on a SC nominee? ShadowLiberal Feb 2016 #16
it depends on how vetted they are already. restorefreedom Feb 2016 #17
Exactly - But the right wing is pushing the notion that nothing will happen until after election liberal N proud Feb 2016 #36
they are gonna fight hard. restorefreedom Feb 2016 #39
He needs to take it to them because you can't leave it open that long liberal N proud Feb 2016 #42
posturing, for now restorefreedom Feb 2016 #44
There is a reason other than Republican obstructionism... vi5 Feb 2016 #40
yeah. i forgot the weenie factor. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #43
Yes, who'll be in charge of flipping off photographers now? Bucky Feb 2016 #3
Was that a fat joke? n/t Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #6
I do believe so farleftlib Feb 2016 #9
No, Scalia was an intellectual joke Bucky Feb 2016 #10
Reichstag is in the rear view mirror now, circa 2001 or so... villager Feb 2016 #29
I'll say! MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #7
Sure is Bobbie Jo Feb 2016 #11
The importance of nominating our best qualified Democratic candidate oasis Feb 2016 #12
Respectfully disagree. Raster Feb 2016 #13
Nonsense. Obama will make this appointment. Autumn Feb 2016 #14
You're saying the GOP is willing to be reasonable? oasis Feb 2016 #20
I'm saying that Obama will fight tooth and nail for this legacy. nt Autumn Feb 2016 #23
A pitched battle will awaken the American public on the importance oasis Feb 2016 #34
Don't care what they think Paulie Feb 2016 #25
You think this congress would confirm his appointment? joshcryer Feb 2016 #22
Completely agree! MoonRiver Feb 2016 #15
Obama makes this appointment, not his successor. longship Feb 2016 #18
As expected, Republicans say they will run out the clock on this and not approve any of Obama's stevenleser Feb 2016 #19
And if they try that it will look very bad for them in November. longship Feb 2016 #26
Nah, they can say "let's not politicize until after the election." joshcryer Feb 2016 #30
He'll be blocked by the GOP. oasis Feb 2016 #24
Rubbish! Absolute rubbish! longship Feb 2016 #37
They will justify their actions. Their constituents will buy it. oasis Feb 2016 #41
And how does that help the GOP in November? longship Feb 2016 #45
Both parties will use this for their respective candidates. joshcryer Feb 2016 #27
He speaks truth. I'm dancing on the ripples out here. morningfog Feb 2016 #21
I just did a cartwheel bravenak Feb 2016 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author m-lekktor Feb 2016 #28
allelujiah amen mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #31
Goodbye!!! Farewell!!! bravenak Feb 2016 #32
People die. The world goes on. cheapdate Feb 2016 #35
Senator Mike Lee (R) of the Senate Judiciary committee just tweeted: UCmeNdc Feb 2016 #38

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
2. it is. and interestingly enough, i found this nugget
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 06:42 PM
Feb 2016

According to records compiled by the Senate Judiciary Committee, it takes an average of 2-1/2 months for a nominee to reach a full vote in the Senate

there is NO reason, other than republican obstructionism, that this can't be done well before the election.

Bucky

(54,027 posts)
8. Timeline... give Obama a month to pick a dignified candidate
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 06:47 PM
Feb 2016

Dems don't go for the hard ideologues that the Heritage Foundation tells Republican presidents to choose. Say three months from now, we'll have the hearings going on right as the two nomination races come to a down-to-the-wire conclusion.

ShadowLiberal

(2,237 posts)
16. I thought it's traditional to wait 3 months for a senate hearing on a SC nominee?
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:00 PM
Feb 2016

I recall reading that in the past during other SC confirmation battles.

The purpose of the tradition is to give the senate time to study and vet the nominee and prepare for the hearings.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
17. it depends on how vetted they are already.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:03 PM
Feb 2016

someone just said on tv that if its someone very well vetted, the process could move along quicker.

liberal N proud

(60,336 posts)
36. Exactly - But the right wing is pushing the notion that nothing will happen until after election
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:17 PM
Feb 2016

Saw FOX while I was out and they are pushing that idiotic idea.

Watching CNN they are saying Obama now ha the opportunity to swing the court.

liberal N proud

(60,336 posts)
42. He needs to take it to them because you can't leave it open that long
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:23 PM
Feb 2016

Knuckle Head McConnell just said they will not give Obama a vote on CNN

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
40. There is a reason other than Republican obstructionism...
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:20 PM
Feb 2016

That being, Democratic spinelessness. Take your pick of either the Senate or the POTUS.

Bucky

(54,027 posts)
3. Yes, who'll be in charge of flipping off photographers now?
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 06:43 PM
Feb 2016

Who'll wear the silly hats? Who'll tell Clarence how to vote?

oasis

(49,389 posts)
12. The importance of nominating our best qualified Democratic candidate
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 06:51 PM
Feb 2016

is underscored. Hillary Clinton is the best qualified of either party.

oasis

(49,389 posts)
34. A pitched battle will awaken the American public on the importance
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:16 PM
Feb 2016

of SCOTUS appointments. That will be a good thing

Paulie

(8,462 posts)
25. Don't care what they think
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:12 PM
Feb 2016

No one on this board should either.

You want to see unified Democrats, let them obstruct.

longship

(40,416 posts)
18. Obama makes this appointment, not his successor.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:06 PM
Feb 2016

And there are many who would disagree with you on your choice, so let's just set that aside and focus on what our current POTUS has to do.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
19. As expected, Republicans say they will run out the clock on this and not approve any of Obama's
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:07 PM
Feb 2016

appointments. They may not even take up a vote on them.

longship

(40,416 posts)
26. And if they try that it will look very bad for them in November.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:12 PM
Feb 2016

People will not like that at all.

Plus, the GOP knows that they are in very big trouble in November with their hold in the Senate.

They are screwed on this, truly screwed.

Obama is holding all the cards on this one. And he is going to know that, if he has any sense at all.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
30. Nah, they can say "let's not politicize until after the election."
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:14 PM
Feb 2016

The American public will eat it up. It's not like their favorables can go lower.

longship

(40,416 posts)
37. Rubbish! Absolute rubbish!
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:18 PM
Feb 2016

They cannot afford to do that in an election year. That would utterly piss off the Dems and give us a huge campaign issue, driving voter turn out up. That's the last thing they want.

Plus, the GOP knows that their hold on the Senate for January is in real danger, almost non-existent.

The GOP is fucked on this. Truly fucked.

oasis

(49,389 posts)
41. They will justify their actions. Their constituents will buy it.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:22 PM
Feb 2016

Wait until blowhard Rush Limbaugh gets to working his pipes on hate radio.

longship

(40,416 posts)
45. And how does that help the GOP in November?
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:35 PM
Feb 2016

The Democratic nominee, you pick which one, will be all over them on this. It would be a huge campaign issue. One party is blocking a president's Constitutional obligation simply because they want to deprive him of it.

Right, that will really work out for them. Not!

And don't forget that the GOP very likely loses the Senate this year. The numbers just work out that way. They are kind of screwed.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
27. Both parties will use this for their respective candidates.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:12 PM
Feb 2016

Obama maybe gets the appointment if a Democrat wins the election (he'll likely nominate a moderate).

Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
35. People die. The world goes on.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:17 PM
Feb 2016

Fuck Scalia. He voted to uphold sodomy laws, expanded police powers, intrusive government surveillance, sexual discrimination in employment. I sure as hell won't miss him.

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)
38. Senator Mike Lee (R) of the Senate Judiciary committee just tweeted:
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 07:18 PM
Feb 2016

Senator Mike Lee (R) of the Senate Judiciary committee just tweeted "What is less than zero?? The chances of Obama successfully appointing a Supreme Court Justice to replace Scalia."

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»David Axelrod- "Scalia's ...