2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFinally. Time: Photographer Says Disputed 1962 Photo Really Does Show Bernie Sanders
The photographer who captured civil rights efforts at the University of Chicago fifty years ago says that recently discovered evidence proves that a young man in a disputed 1962 photo is, in fact, Bernie Sanders.
The 1962 photo of a man leading a sit-in against segregated housing at the university, which Sanders campaign had been promoting to illustrate his involvement in the civil rights movement, came under scrutiny after TIME published an article last year with accounts by four alumni who doubted Sanders was the young man in the photo.
Now, photographer Danny Lyontoday a well-known chronicler of the Civil Rights-eratold TIME he believes that newly-found photo contact sheets settle questions about the dramatic 1962 picture.
The contact sheets, reviewed by TIME, show pictures of the 21-year-old Sanders sitting on the floor wearing a rough, brown sweater and white shirt in what appears to be the same room as the disputed photo. The clothing Sanders is wearing on the floor in the recently discovered contact sheets looks to be the same as the clothing the young man is wearing in the photo in question.
Moreover, Lyon said that based on their order on the contact sheets, the newly discovered pictures of Sanders were taken immediately after the disputed photo.
Im deducing it by looking at the other photos on the contact sheets. Contact sheets are like evidence, Lyon said in an interview. Theres no question that that person standing there is Bernie Sanders.
By the early afternoon on Saturday, the University of Chicago archives had changed the caption to identify the man as Sanders. The university had previously changed the caption to say the man in the photo was actually a classmate of Sanders.
<snip>
http://time.com/4220480/bernie-sanders-disputed-civil-rights-photo-1962/
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)'well, the photographer might be wrong'.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The new birthers are never going to let this go.
cali
(114,904 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I just hate how it all went down, the whole thing stinks of Brock and I fear it's just the beginning.
jillan
(39,451 posts)that first spewed this filth, the original liar, the one before Capehart.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Now there will be blow back, and with Sen. Lewis making his remarks today, the Sunday shows might even cover some of it.
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)Thank you for this important information.
Many years ago, an extended family member -- my grandfather's cousin -- located me, and gave me the family bible from Ireland,and hundreds of pictures -- including tin-types from the Old Sod, and "modern" photos taken up to the late 1940s. Not all of them had writing on the backs, to identify who was in them.
I've noted in the past that many of my father's siblings were in law enforcement. I sought out one, a detective, who taught me hoe to ID people in photos -- including people who may look very similar to someone else. (This was a common feature in the extended family: some pictures of great uncles, for example, look mighty close to my brothers and I.)
While I'm no expert, I was convinced that the photo in question was indeed Bernie Sanders.