or

where did I place my umbrella? Could get shitty over here.

The average voter cares about those transcripts, or the average voter cares about what Capehart does?

Answer: neither.

I'll wager that the average voter thinks Goldman-Sachs are personal injury lawyers, and that Capehart is a suburb in South Africa.

I do not and think they should have all the data to make an informed decision.

It's a matter of political junkies believing that these things actually matter to the average voter.

release her transcripts, lol

The average voter would pore over those transcripts, and read every last word.

I think voters would be more interested in knowing what Bernie knew, and when he knew it, about his campaign accessing HRC's computer data, the unauthorized use of organizations' logos on his mailers, and posing as union members to access restricted areas.

But that information won't be forthcoming any time soon, will it?

I find it hard to believe Bernie knew much about what many staffers are doing on the campaign and he has fired at least one and rebuked others and apologized for all of those charges.

Hillary on the other hand is sole owner and responsible for the transcripts. She has put out many times she is looking into the release of those transcripts. Is she not telling the truth in those statement she made? And yes many many voters want to know what she said for the nearly THREE QUARTERS OF A MILLION DOLLARS she put into her personal bank account.

Name them.

The only people wanting those transcripts are BS supporters, pinning their hopes on the notion that they contain something damaging.

NO ONE ELSE CARES.

good lord,

Many on the fence and undecided would like as much information as possible to make an informed decision. Are you the one to make the decision on what they should have available to them? Like I said, that is indeed very arrogant in my opinion.

No interest at all

I'm guessing there's rich material in Hillary's speeches to mine and she knows it

Made a big difference with many voters. If course some here want to make the decision for them on what they should have available to make that very important decision.

Once the message gets to them.

Meanwhile, we'll have a bunch of hand twisters hoping all this won't while defending every attempt at an informed electorate.

Seriously?

The only people interested in those transcripts are BSers who are hoping they contain a "gotcha" moment that can be used against HRC.

NO ONE ELSE CARES.

sounds a little on the arrogant side if you ask me.

Other than BS supporters, there aren't any.

There's also the fact that being as the transcripts are only in HRC's possession, if she released them the immediate cry from BSers would be that she altered them before their release.

In effect, BSers having already floated that possibility of tampering, so there is no point in releasing them. Ever.

You BSers have actually made the case for why she shouldn't release them - because, as far as you're concerned, she's damned if she does and equally damned if she doesn't.

Not a smart move.

... and were unaffected by, in the same way Mitt's refusal to release tax returns didn't affect voters as much as it should have.

The average voter is not on political websites 24/7. There's a lot they don't know, and don't pay attention to. And the average voter is not going to sift through pages of HRC speeches - that's just the way of the world.

Wow, you're approaching Baghdad Bob territory at this point.

ALL voters must demand them before you will agree for them to be released.

She has them and they can be studied and verified by forensic experts. There was also a transcriber per her contract that could verify the accuracy of them. Not to mention, I bet there was video of them for her or the GS.

I agree not a smart move, that would have been to release them that night before even the appearance that they could have been edited. She chose not to and lied to the voters.

You only know who doesn't.

... doesn't change the fact that the average voter is not demanding transcripts - only BSers are.

... what she said to Wall Street firms, if the transcripts aren't available? And if they DO know what she said, why are the transcripts important?

That must be why she's still "looking into it". Funny I don't always remember you being this obtuse.

Fine. Name them.

Show the outcry from average voters demanding the release of those transcripts - people other than BSers.

Post a link to average Democrats standing on the street with placards saying "WE DEMAND THE TRANSCRIPTS!"

As I've said elsewhere in this thread, the fact that BSers have already stated that if she DOES release the transcripts, they will immediately declare that she altered them, has in itself negated any motivation to release them.

She's damned if she does and damned if she doesn't - so there's really no need to release them in any event, given that the outcome will be the same either way.

Otherwise she would have already released them. Only cranks would claim they were altered, or she could easily paint them that way in any case. That's not what is keeping her from releasing them. I think you kinda know that already.

... that if she doesn't release the transcripts, it's because she's hiding something - and if she does release them, they will claim she altered them while they were in her sole possession.

So what's her motivation for releasing them, if she's already been judged guilty of something either way?

And you know it. This is one of the most absurd arguments I've seen in a long time. But, if it's the best you've got, have fun with it.

I'm just stating the fact that there is absolutely NO reason for her to release those transcripts. Her supporters don't care about them, and the only people who DO care about them have already determined she's guilty of something whether she releases them or not.

So what's the point?

Nice confession.

It fits with her campaign, I must say.

must be really looking into it!

However, they may have been on the server she wiped with a cloth or something.

I'm going to steal that clock for an OP that I hope NEVER dies....!

He isn't fooling anyone but his followers.

Jonathan Capehart stunt the he is pulling is so obvious

No wonder people are so turned off by MSM

Someone with access will leak it out.

Let's hope it happens now.

Because if Clinton wins the nomination, you can be certain it will happen then, and be designed to damage her on behalf of the Republicans.

Just like the other two possibilities, just ain't gonna happen

The establishment would want some security about their netherworld comfort before they abandon their echo-chambered luxury bubble.

on Halley's comet, myself...

I don't think he has deep psychological resources to withstand the sort of mockery that's inundating him, I can see him doing something really unfortunate.