2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOn FB: Bernie was a conscientious objector, and wants now to be C-n-C!
Me: Because, yeah, it's better to perjure yourself and claim you have debilitating anal cysts in order to avoid service.
The pretzel-a-tronics that conservative douchebags are turning themselves into ... it's breathtaking. Seriously.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)him lying us into another war.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Fortunately, Bernie will not be the nominee.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I think I should have made it clear I wasn't saying that I was observing it or something something. Musing I guess.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)...is a hell of a lot worse. Blatantly lied about dealing with war conditions just like Brian Williams.
HDSam
(251 posts)of many reasons I dislike Hillary. Drumming up some BS sniper story for personal gain is pathetic, unethical, and disrespectful.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)Is that Brian Williams' career was ruined while it was just a bump in the road for Hillary.
Guess that is the difference between politicians and journalists. We expect politicians to lie to us, which is a sad commentary on how cynical our society has become. I guess we can thank Nixon for starting us down that path.
jillan
(39,451 posts)PonyUp
(1,680 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)But they're more than willing to send others to war at the drop of a hat.
dogman
(6,073 posts)Trump was allowed to diss McCain.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)What the fuck kind of American President is that!
Hillary, at least, is ready to drop the nukes on Iran!
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)And he was elected twice.
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)If I recall correctly, he had written a letter pleading some National Guard muckymuck to help him stay out of Nam and then got a very high draft number.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Because it will.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)Current FBI investigation. Don't think for one second the GOP will let her off the hook on these.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)But this is one of my bigger worries for the fall.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)Have a great track record on that. I think Sanders would be able to hit them hard on the fact they are bought and paid for by big money donations. The contrast will be clear.
Of course I figure Hillary will still get the nomination and lose in a landslide due to FBI and all the other baggage.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)That's going to be really, really rough.
but it wouldn't be difficult to point out that none of the other candidates have military service and have also voted in favor of military action.
In any case, the question "why didn't you serve" is probably a very delicate subject that the other candidates are likely to tiptoe around, particularly Trump, who was in his early twenties during Vietnam and definitely draft age.
Kasich and Carson were draft age as well in the late sixties and probably won't bring it up to avoid having to answer difficult questions about their own lack of service.
Cruz and Rubio are slightly younger than I am and could have signed up but it appears they chose not to. They likely would have had a fairly quiet time since they would have just missed the Gulf War. They don't remember much if anything about Vietnam (neither do I for that matter) so any criticism by them will come off as weak because they never had any skin in the game.
HDSam
(251 posts)republican candidate with military service, they're going to have difficulty because they'll be asked why they didn't sign up for service during a period that was largely quiet.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)If you can't see that attack ad already...
HDSam
(251 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)If they were war hungry they would probably just go full on batshitcrazy and register as Republicans. So, Bernie just has to get more Independents than the Republican candidate does and I don't think they have a sane enough candidate to run that will get the Independents.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 15, 2016, 01:26 AM - Edit history (1)
Nite Owl
(11,303 posts)candidates have served? Doubt that it can be used.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)What stopped her?
HDSam
(251 posts)have standards?
a retired Army veteran and I have zero issues with the fact Bernie used the legitimate C/O process to avoid doing something his conscious told him was wrong. Of course, he could have found any number of other ways to avoid service, like heading to Canada or, as another mentioned, coming up with some medical disqualifier, but he didn't.
The candidate that doesn't like war, that doesn't see it as the first or second option but the very last option, that performs their due diligence before committing to put troops on the ground, that's the candidate I want as CINC.
I acknowledge my opinion will, of course, not be echoed by some of my brothers and sisters in arms, but it is mine.
Concerning the GE and republicans, I don't recall hearing any of them serving, so good luck trying to tar and feather him about it. The moment one of them opens up their yap to chastise him for it, they better be ready to answer why they didn't put their name on the dotted line.
Docreed2003
(16,875 posts)MgtPA
(1,022 posts)He applied for conscientious objector status, and was turned down. So not being drafted wasn't due to his being a conscientious objector, because he wasn't one.
renate
(13,776 posts)Bush and Cheney sent hundreds of thousands into horrible battle as if it were a game. Not just hundreds of thousands of Americans but hundreds of thousands of others are paying the price every single day.
I volunteer on a veterans' crisis line. Some people came back fine. Some people did not. The suffering is incredible. Just beyond words. It would shatter any normal person to hear just one soldier's story. I want a Commander in Chief who does NOT send people into war lightly. And if he is a conscientious objector, I am certain that he will not play war games with the lives of others.