On how to issue a correction or retraction. Curious on what the Hillary supporters would say a boutique this lie?

Only her coronation does.

It was just a difference of opinion as to what the actual words were, and what they meant.

Sort of like Capehart and that photo.

In a way, Capehart and that photo is sort of a foreshadowing of what is to come. Almost everything is on record now, in private files or YouTube or whatever.

It used to be that a lie would circle the globe before the truth could put on its shoes.

Now, you don't even need shoes. You just have to hit some keys to bring up the truth, and a few more keys to send it all over the planet. Probably out into space at the same time.

You can run but you can't hide. As long as the PTB is unable to shut the Internet down the liars have to sweat.

She says that a lot.

I am bookmarking your thread. I knew Clinton was very critical of Obama's foreign policy now I have proof I can link you. Thanks.

Forward? I heard he wrote the whole thing!

Which he DID. So it's thls OP that is lying.

In debating about the current president's successes, Hillary Clinton accused Sanders of writing a book blurb critical of the Obama administration, but the dig is only kinda sorta based in truth. ... Sanders did indeed pen an endorsement for a book by Bill Press entitled Buyer's Remorse: How Obama Let Progressives Down.

While it's true that Sanders does not specifically mention Obama per se in that blurb for the book, he does talk about how the president must "keep rallying the people who elected him or her." That's a tacit implication that Obama (the subject of the book) has not done that.

I contest that implication vociferously. Obama has criss-crossed the country trying to rally support for the ACA, for gun control, for his infrastructure spending, etc. He still maintains a massive organization--Organizing for America--that not only has chapters that have organized public actions on behalf of these progressive causes, but that also TRAINS organizers. I still get daily emails from them. And I have attended public action events for both gun control and health care on the organization's behalf.

When you endorse a book with a blurb, you are inherently endorsing the preponderance of what the book says. I know: my husband was recently asked to write a blurb for a book that he really didn't care for. He politely declined to do so, even if it meant his name would appear on the book jacket. There's a MORALITY to that.

So the OP has made--yet another--false premise the subject of an attack post. No one EVER said he wrote the forward.

Edit because I found it here: http://www.bustle.com/articles/141435-did-bernie-sanders-write-about-obama-hillary-clinton-accuses-him-of-penning-against-president

Which, oddly enough says the exact same thing the OP does. You owe the OP an apology.

She may have mistated the word "forward" for jacket blurb in a fast-paced debate. But his writing does definitely, absolutely appear on the book's cover in big, bold print. And sorry, you can't endorse a book on its cover and then say you don't endorse its main idea: how Obama disappointed his constituency.

String the witch up for a word! Burn her in hell! She used the wrong word!

But, of course, pardon Bernie for everything from his staff stealing voter data, passing out illegal flyers, making ads that suggest endorsements that were never made, and having to issue apology after apology for misstatements or misactions. But a word, oh! Let's make a federal case out of it.

The point is that Sanders has INDEED criticized Obama time and again, even calling for a primary against a sitting president--something that is never, EVER done by members of a president's party. But of course, he isn't a member of the president's party. He actually had the gall to call from his perch as an independent for someone to primary the sitting president of another party.

This is ridiculous.

Perfect.

Bets on whether the Hillarian will have the integrity to apologize?

... is exactly equatable to all the "apology" that will be made by actual campaign officials.

-- Mal

This is no surprise.

HRC is unfit to be POTUS, let alone SoS.