Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 05:34 PM Feb 2016

How a Washington Post writer’s attack on Bernie Sanders’ civil rights record completely backfired

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/02/how-a-washington-post-writers-attack-on-bernie-sanders-civil-rights-record-completely-backfired/

On Saturday afternoon the Washington Post’s Jonathan Capehart walked back a widely circulated “debunking” of a photo of Bernie Sanders from his days at the University of Chicago during the civil rights sit-ins of 1962


The official answer, given Capehart’s finger-wagging tone, is that the truth is important and he’s simply trying to correct the record. In fact, it’s an attempt to undermine the two things Sanders needs more than anything right now: people to trust him and African-American voters to like him. Perhaps Capehart believed using his prime op-ed column inches to resurrect a three-month-old story to shame a few Sanders partisans on Twitter was a good use of his pundit capital, but it’s more likely he just wanted to further muddy the waters on Sanders’ civil rights record in the runup to the largely African-American South Carolina primary.


Shouldn’t he have done his reporting and fact-checking before he accused the Sanders campaign of deliberately spreading false misinformation about Sanders’ civil rights record?
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How a Washington Post wri...