How a Washington Post writer’s attack on Bernie Sanders’ civil rights record completely backfired
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/02/how-a-washington-post-writers-attack-on-bernie-sanders-civil-rights-record-completely-backfired/
On Saturday afternoon the Washington Posts Jonathan Capehart walked back a widely circulated debunking of a photo of Bernie Sanders from his days at the University of Chicago during the civil rights sit-ins of 1962
The official answer, given Capeharts finger-wagging tone, is that the truth is important and hes simply trying to correct the record. In fact, its an attempt to undermine the two things Sanders needs more than anything right now: people to trust him and African-American voters to like him. Perhaps Capehart believed using his prime op-ed column inches to resurrect a three-month-old story to shame a few Sanders partisans on Twitter was a good use of his pundit capital, but its more likely he just wanted to further muddy the waters on Sanders civil rights record in the runup to the largely African-American South Carolina primary.
Shouldnt he have done his reporting and fact-checking before he accused the Sanders campaign of deliberately spreading false misinformation about Sanders civil rights record?