Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 08:54 AM Feb 2016

I can pull you out of poverty...but I can't make people stop discriminating against you...

Last edited Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:45 AM - Edit history (1)

that is the answer to all this bullshit about Bernie's problem with ANY community...

discrimination is personal...the individual must find it in themselves to realize we are all alike...

NOBODY can MAKE them come to that decision...


DISCRIMINATION is being addressed in the broadest sense...not merely in the law, but in the inner feelings of people and their prejudices

53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I can pull you out of poverty...but I can't make people stop discriminating against you... (Original Post) islandmkl Feb 2016 OP
Sadly that is true. PatrickforO Feb 2016 #1
True. The answer doesn't lie in keeping them poor & hoping people become decent & racism ends RiverLover Feb 2016 #6
I don't recall asking him to do either nt firebrand80 Feb 2016 #2
But Hillary Promised To End Racism!! fontagobay Feb 2016 #3
Are we surprised? CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #26
+100000 artislife Feb 2016 #28
He should put that out there. That's exactly how he feels. boston bean Feb 2016 #4
Well, how do you feel about it? HerbChestnut Feb 2016 #17
No I do not think the statement is accurate. boston bean Feb 2016 #18
Okay, then what would you do to end racism? HerbChestnut Feb 2016 #19
I'd probably start by not telling black people there is nothing their government can do boston bean Feb 2016 #20
Well, Bernie hasn't said that. HerbChestnut Feb 2016 #21
Sanders has also put forth some other-than-economic ideas thesquanderer Feb 2016 #27
Amen uponit7771 Feb 2016 #36
Okay, then what? frylock Feb 2016 #48
you sure as hell can dsc Feb 2016 #5
But you can't change what's in peoples' hearts with legislation. Vinca Feb 2016 #7
well have to say that I am damn glad Johnson didn't think this way dsc Feb 2016 #9
You don't think a person who hates you but is forced to rent you a room isn't racism? Vinca Feb 2016 #12
I really don't give a rats ass if he hates me or not dsc Feb 2016 #22
It's obvious we're having a discussion about 2 different things. Vinca Feb 2016 #40
that is why it when it is merely personal it is more often described as bigotry these days. bettyellen Feb 2016 #41
are you really claiming he got rid of 'racism'?...because that seems to be the point... islandmkl Feb 2016 #14
I don't give a rats ass about changing minds dsc Feb 2016 #24
Thank you for clarifying that you aren't actually trying to fight racism Hydra Feb 2016 #31
Ditto. I too don't give a damn either what racists think of me because I think even less of them. brush Feb 2016 #53
No we can't! eom lunamagica Feb 2016 #34
Not the goal either, make sure their thoughts don't get into the way of persuit of hapiness uponit7771 Feb 2016 #37
And do you seriously think that fontagobay Feb 2016 #8
you still got served which is the point dsc Feb 2016 #10
And they only spat in the food a little bit. jeff47 Feb 2016 #33
Change is painful and slow, but it's a hell of a lot easier Ron Green Feb 2016 #11
So the Voting Rights Act was pointless... brooklynite Feb 2016 #13
you do not...you seem about half-right...which in baseball and batting is stellar... islandmkl Feb 2016 #15
Laws against discrimination prevent State discrimination and offer recourse to those discriminated Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #23
They stop the effects before they start though, the state plays a huge role in protecting marginaliz uponit7771 Feb 2016 #38
no one can eradicate racism noiretextatique Feb 2016 #16
but if we bring people together in common cause tk2kewl Feb 2016 #25
Sigh, laws against discrimination have zero to do with fixing people's feelings. Starry Messenger Feb 2016 #29
Thread winner... uponit7771 Feb 2016 #39
^ This, although in some cases ... Myrina Feb 2016 #44
By prosecuting them when they violate civil rights laws. Starry Messenger Feb 2016 #45
None of the candidates can. If you think Hillary can then you're lying to JRLeft Feb 2016 #30
But white racial attitudes have improved somewhat over the past 60 -70 years. raging moderate Feb 2016 #32
In the early 50s my family took me along shopping in Souix jwirr Feb 2016 #47
Strawman at best, it's the job of the state to protect minorities of all kinds from abuse by uponit7771 Feb 2016 #35
I think the point is Blue_In_AK Feb 2016 #42
The strawman is no one is talking about ending racism the thoughts, that's impossible... uponit7771 Feb 2016 #49
And yet Sanders is the only candidate held to the standard of "solving racism in 4 years" arcane1 Feb 2016 #51
we're not all in poverty bigtree Feb 2016 #43
True but we can have laws and policies to counter that discrimination Matariki Feb 2016 #46
Yes, laws can force racists to respect the rights of others. raging moderate Feb 2016 #50
Not quite HassleCat Feb 2016 #52

PatrickforO

(14,592 posts)
1. Sadly that is true.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:02 AM
Feb 2016

This is exactly why I've been talking about how the 'race problem' meme that's being levied against Bernie is little more than the establishment's effort to divide and conquer us so they can continue the economic enslavement of everybody. Because if we take back our government and pull everyone out of poverty, much of the economic incentive for racism and xenophobia disappears.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
6. True. The answer doesn't lie in keeping them poor & hoping people become decent & racism ends
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:06 AM
Feb 2016

That hasn't worked so far, anyways.

 

fontagobay

(45 posts)
3. But Hillary Promised To End Racism!!
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:03 AM
Feb 2016

By throwing money at it because thats the only thing she understands

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
26. Are we surprised?
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:53 AM
Feb 2016

I mean, the woman is sauntering around the country feeding at the trough of Wall Street, like a little piggy--but at the next debate she'll be telling us how she's going to reign in the big banks!

She will say whatever it takes. Her words mean nothing. She's a liar.

And this whole, "I'm going to end racism" bullshit, is only a dig on Bernie. Do people get that? She thinks she's spotted a weakness in Bernie's messaging! Because his solutions deal with economics, she's trying oh-so hard to position economic solutions as a sign of racism and a complete inability to understand African American issues. Isn't she a doll?

She does give a rat's ass about anything, except getting elected.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
18. No I do not think the statement is accurate.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:54 AM
Feb 2016

But it would be helpful to clear the air once and for all on this.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
20. I'd probably start by not telling black people there is nothing their government can do
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:01 AM
Feb 2016

to tackle discrimination and racism.

THAT IS LUDICROUS AND INSULTING!

dsc

(52,166 posts)
5. you sure as hell can
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:05 AM
Feb 2016

do you think that when the Civil Rights Act was passed and Woolworth's lunch counter accepted black customers for the first time that was idle coincidence. It's a pretty simple concept, you want to run a business you don't get to discriminate but that concept wasn't the law until 1964 which is why businesses in the South didn't run that way until then.

Vinca

(50,304 posts)
7. But you can't change what's in peoples' hearts with legislation.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:11 AM
Feb 2016

Hate is hate. Some people will never feel otherwise no matter who is elected, what events happen or what laws are passed. IMO, which doesn't count for much, the best hope for ending discrimination is younger generations. Each generation seems to be more color blind than the previous. I wish the fix was as easy as legislation, but it's not.

dsc

(52,166 posts)
9. well have to say that I am damn glad Johnson didn't think this way
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:16 AM
Feb 2016

I really don't care if the person renting me a hotel room hates my guts but I care a whole fuck of a lot if the only hotel on the highway will rent me the room. No you can't change a person's heart by changing the law. but you sure can change lives. Many of my friends got marriage licences from people who, I am quite sure, think they are going to hell but bottom line they can visit their spouse in the hospital, they can get their spouses pension and social security, they can be on their spouses insurance, and all of the other 1000 plus rights the rest of the populace too for granted for the past 100 or so years. Similarly, blacks no longer have to wonder if the local drug store will let them in the front door.

Vinca

(50,304 posts)
12. You don't think a person who hates you but is forced to rent you a room isn't racism?
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:23 AM
Feb 2016

Somehow the reason for the hatred has to be targeted. I want you to have the damn room, but I don't want the hotel manager to hate you. Legislation was and is necessary to get you in the door, but it's not the root of the problem. The racism is still there.

dsc

(52,166 posts)
22. I really don't give a rats ass if he hates me or not
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:20 AM
Feb 2016

Laws shouldn't be and can't be in the business of mind control but what laws can do and should do is mandate equal treatment. I have had students I have found distasteful over the years, but if that student gets 95% right on the test his or her grade should be 95%. My district can't mandate that I like a child, it can, and should, mandate that I treat the child the same regardless of if I like him or don't like him.

Vinca

(50,304 posts)
40. It's obvious we're having a discussion about 2 different things.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 01:51 PM
Feb 2016

You're discussing racial discrimination and I'm discussing racism. One doesn't equal the other.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
41. that is why it when it is merely personal it is more often described as bigotry these days.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 02:28 PM
Feb 2016

And from what I have read lately, the younger generation is no better than those who proceeded it.

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
14. are you really claiming he got rid of 'racism'?...because that seems to be the point...
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:27 AM
Feb 2016

Last edited Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:11 AM - Edit history (1)

making discrimination illegal merely did just that...to think that it, by law alone, changed the hearts of racists is naive at best....

people should make up their mind what they think they are arguing about...don't look for a 'plan to end racism' unless you are just promoting a meme...

look for a plan to help people...like MLK,Jr. said...what good is it to get you a seat at the lunch counter if you don't have enough money to buy a hamburger...

dsc

(52,166 posts)
24. I don't give a rats ass about changing minds
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:21 AM
Feb 2016

except to the degree that in a democracy one has to have sufficient popular support for the laws in question. The fact is had Johnson taken your advice we would still have segregated lunch counters.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
31. Thank you for clarifying that you aren't actually trying to fight racism
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 11:18 AM
Feb 2016

We're all trying to fight discrimination(except the RW, including here). Laws can do that, and should. Economic justice legislation does exactly that.

brush

(53,871 posts)
53. Ditto. I too don't give a damn either what racists think of me because I think even less of them.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 01:02 AM
Feb 2016

Last edited Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:46 AM - Edit history (1)

Just obey the anti-dicrimination laws and get out of my way.

And about the OP stating (patronizingly I might add), "I can pull you out of poverty . . ."

No, just take the roadblocks to opportunity out of the way and people will pull themselves out of poverty.

 

fontagobay

(45 posts)
8. And do you seriously think that
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:14 AM
Feb 2016

those people wouldn't have thought to call me a nigger if I sat down for lunch there in 1964, 1965, 1966, 1967...?

dsc

(52,166 posts)
10. you still got served which is the point
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:17 AM
Feb 2016

just like I am still able to get my marriage licence even if the clerk thinks I am a pervert.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
33. And they only spat in the food a little bit.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 11:33 AM
Feb 2016

Just because they had to seat you doesn't mean they have to treat you well.

Ron Green

(9,823 posts)
11. Change is painful and slow, but it's a hell of a lot easier
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:18 AM
Feb 2016

when your government is about building community rather than empire.

brooklynite

(94,736 posts)
13. So the Voting Rights Act was pointless...
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:24 AM
Feb 2016

...individuals must find it in themselves to stop discriminating.

Do I have that right?

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
15. you do not...you seem about half-right...which in baseball and batting is stellar...
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:32 AM
Feb 2016

same for 3-point shots in basketball...

Strawman question....

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
23. Laws against discrimination prevent State discrimination and offer recourse to those discriminated
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:21 AM
Feb 2016

against. They do not end discrimination. The Fair Housing Act has to be enforced because in spite of that law people discriminate against others. It has to be actively enforced. There is no such law to offer recourse to LGBT in housing or in employment. None. When such a law passes, the discrimination will not vanish, it will become less blatant and require great vigilance in enforcement.

You can pass a law that says I'm your equal but many straights will still offer up the Stank Eye to all LGBT and there is nothing that can be done about that outside the hearts and minds of the people who express that contempt.

Seems wildly obvious from my point of view.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
16. no one can eradicate racism
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:44 AM
Feb 2016

but we work to dismantle the damage done by welfare reform and mass incarcerations, for example. and that requires regime change.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
25. but if we bring people together in common cause
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:37 AM
Feb 2016

then we learn from one another, and that is how we combat racism and sexism

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
44. ^ This, although in some cases ...
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 02:47 PM
Feb 2016

.... as I have seen from my less educated family & acquaintances ... those laws against discrimination actually make people hate more. They give them someone(s) - and the wrong someone(s), of course - to focus their dissatisfaction on. The old "10 cookies on the plate and the CEO takes 9 of them" thing, in action, just with revolving minorities in the "other" role.


How do we correct that faulty mind-programming?

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
45. By prosecuting them when they violate civil rights laws.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 02:54 PM
Feb 2016

Haters, as they say, are going to hate. White people do indeed get inflamed by racism when other races get a little progress, and do things like vote against social programs out of race hatred. http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2016/2/racism-undermines-support-for-government-spending.html

The only thing we can really do is undercut their social power by outvoting them, imo. Don't let them take power.

raging moderate

(4,309 posts)
32. But white racial attitudes have improved somewhat over the past 60 -70 years.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 11:27 AM
Feb 2016

And some whites have made excellent progress. Some of them just had never had any real contact with Black people. There were large groups of white people, just not the aggressive sort that generally gets over-rewarded in white society, who had to keep their noses to the grindstone and didn't have a good chance to go anywhere or do anything around Black people.

Then, all the legislation limiting the power of racist domineering white people led to the voices and images of all different sorts of Black people on radio and TV, explaining things, expressing things, and generally living their lives. I remember my old mother saying that the few Black people she had seen in the old days always looked so sad and scared and worn, so now it made her so happy to see a bunch of them sashaying around her, happy and well-fed and energized. There were many white people who suddenly had the chance to get to know some Black people.

Once they did, they found that they liked a lot of Black people and even greatly admired a bunch of them. It was fun to get to know a whole new bunch of people, like us in many ways but also with some interesting new ideas and music and figures of speech. And for some white people it was a revelation about themselves, as they thought to themselves, I always felt inside that there was something fishy and self-serving about the domineering white people's opinions of Black people ...oh, my goodness, I was RIGHT about something and those dominating white people were WRONG. Even though those people are rich and I'm not, I was RIGHT about something! What else might there be that I could be right about? And so they learned what part of their guts to trust and gained the courage to listen to different points of view and speak up and contribute for somebody down on his/her luck.

But now, with the iron grip of the ultra-right billionaires tightening on the radio and TV stations, these white people are being fed a line of propaganda designed to bring them back in line. They are being told constantly that the economic problems are being caused by lazy greedy Black people taking huge amounts of money from the rest of us. And the hotheaded white people who are so ready to toady to powerful bullies are getting very strident and threatening. Again. Just like they were in the eighteenth century. And for some very similar reasons. It reminds me of that play, Rhinoceros, by Ionesco.

I just moved to Maryland from Northern Illinois. In Northern Illinois, most radio was right-wing, but there were a few stations where I could listen to progressive radio. I am so much closer to people like Bill Press and Tom Hartman geographically, but suddenly I cannot find them on my radio. Not anywhere. And TV also seems to be more uniform here.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
47. In the early 50s my family took me along shopping in Souix
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 02:54 PM
Feb 2016

City Iowa. I was 9 years old and had never even known that there were black people. My grandmother pointed a black person out to me without giving any details. Because I had met Native Americans visiting family in northern MN I knew that there were other people so it did not seem all that different to me.

I grew up without bias and when the 60s came it was not hard to side with those being oppressed. And most of the people in my very rural white part of Iowa were the same. We had not stake in the argument. What we heard about racism was new to us -except the part of the family that had been in the Korean War.

Today that part of Iowa has Steven King as a representative. When the OP talks about it not being worse I question that. How did we go from my childhood to Steven King?

uponit7771

(90,364 posts)
35. Strawman at best, it's the job of the state to protect minorities of all kinds from abuse by
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 11:39 AM
Feb 2016

... the majority not just "make" people do things

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
42. I think the point is
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 02:40 PM
Feb 2016

you can pass all the laws and protections in the world, which is good and should be done, but some people are STILL going to be racist. Thus, neither Bernie nor Hillary nor anyone else can end racism. That has to come from the heart of each individual.

uponit7771

(90,364 posts)
49. The strawman is no one is talking about ending racism the thoughts, that's impossible...
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 06:18 PM
Feb 2016

...the context is the institutions of racism or whatever the enablers of those institutions.

Like our judicial system

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
51. And yet Sanders is the only candidate held to the standard of "solving racism in 4 years"
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 12:49 AM
Feb 2016

Funny how that works.

bigtree

(86,005 posts)
43. we're not all in poverty
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 02:42 PM
Feb 2016

...nor do all of the challenges and abuses we face involve getting someone to like us.

There really isn't any provision of law which mandates 'trust' - or even understanding, or respect for each other - as a condition of our rights to equal treatment under the law. Those are certainly fine aspirations, but our rights are inherent in the Constitution which (improbably, at the time of its inception) asserts that we are all created equal. That's where our rights are drawn from, not from any expectation that we love or respect each other before they are administered fairly. I think most people understand that.

For centuries, the realities of patronage, wealth, and political power have been impediments to social changes which would level the playing field for minorities and blacks in America. Yet, these are only a part of the privileges afforded white individuals, as blacks often find that even these advantages fail to insulate them from denial of opportunities and protection from discrimination at all levels of interaction with society; discrimination in housing; in job placement and advancement; compensation; as well as disparities in arrest, justice, sentencing.

In these instances, income is not an insulation against abuse. There are ways to legislate adherence to these basic rights.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
46. True but we can have laws and policies to counter that discrimination
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 02:54 PM
Feb 2016

Police accountability, reforms in the justice system, affirmative action, etc.

raging moderate

(4,309 posts)
50. Yes, laws can force racists to respect the rights of others.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 12:46 AM
Feb 2016

Laws can either facilitate racism (as when police are allowed to arrest or harass people for pointing a phone camera their way when they are dealing with minority citizens) or they can prohibit racism (as when the Federal government sends troops to escort little Black children into school, or when a state is forced to extend voting rights to all citizens over age 18). And the right-wing billionaires should never have been allowed to buy up most of the radio stations in the US. Those are OUR airwaves; they belong to ALL of us! And, as I said, when different points of view were easier to access a few decades ago, I definitely heard some gradual improvement in the attitudes expressed by many of the white people around me. I think some of this backlash has been orchestrated, in order to divide and conquer.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
52. Not quite
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 12:52 AM
Feb 2016

There are things we can do to speed up the process. Voting rights and fair housing were two of the biggies that really got the ball rolling. There are some specific problems right now that don't have much to do with personal feelings. Voter ID laws and better police relations are two that come to mind.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I can pull you out of pov...