2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton has Goldman Handcuffs. Yes, that's how they talk about her at Goldman Sachs.
Last edited Thu Feb 18, 2016, 01:30 PM - Edit history (1)
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/2/17/1486518/-Hillary-s-Goldman-Handcuffs-Yes-that-is-there-nickname-for-herBy TomP
Wednesday Feb 17, 2016 · 8:44 AM MST
Bloomberg Business Weeks John Green:
Yes. Well, we did a Bloomberg news story yesterday, talked to some rich Wall Street bankers, and one of them an ex Goldman Sachs partner said that they actually have a nickname for Hillary Clinton, the fact shes given so many speeches, made so much money, they refer to it as Hillarys Goldman handcuffs, which is obviously a reference to Golden handcuffs. And I tweeted that yesterday and liberal Twitter, sort of, went wild. Because, I think it really resonates and gets at that lurking fear that Democratic voters have that maybe Clinton is too close to these Wall Street banks.
https://grabien.com/story.php?id=48793
For those who do not know what golden handcuffs are, here is a definition:
Golden handcuffs, a phrase first recorded in 1976,[1] refers to financial allurements and benefits that have the objective to encourage highly compensated employees to remain within a company instead of moving from company to company (opposite of a golden parachute). Golden handcuffs come in different forms: Employee stock options, which endow only when the employee has been with the company for different years and contractual agreements, that consist of bonuses or other forms of benefits which must be repaid to the company if the employee leaves before the date agreed on.[2] Golden handcuffs are frequently used for jobs that require rare and specialised skills or in a "tight labor market", where jobs are more common than workers. In any case, golden handcuffs are usually very expensive for the company and therefore they are not appreciated by shareholders and directors.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)The whole country will have them.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Rainbows and Ponies and Unicorns, Oh my!
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)How, um, apropos.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)VERY VERY fascinating
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)Well made.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)This issue is foundational. If we don't have a democracy, then we have NOTHING.
If our elected representatives are beholden to these corrupt, Wall Street special interests (and all of the other powerful special interests) than we have NOTHING.
"We The People" don't have a voice.
So happy that Bernie is rejecting this game that destroys our democracy.
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)a 100% wholly-owned subsidiary of Wall Street.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)She has said she would be hard on them, they took note and pulled 90% of their support shown here by your own post.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)It was hurting her chances of winning and thereby benefitting them.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)gyroscope
(1,443 posts)let's just forget about the $150 million she and her husband got from Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and others since 2001.
Money that didn't go into any campaign but straight into their pockets.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)How?
By spending the money she raised was to buy one of those big foam hands they sell at sporting events? Do you know how much one of those costs at the stadium? Highway robbery I'm telling you, highway robbery! Once she has one of these foam hands, then she'll really be able to waggle her finger REALLY hard!
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)2008 vs 2016????
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)from 2008 and today.
So tell us, what true accomplishments as SOS and senator makes Hillary qualified to have earned your trust?
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)You know that and you don'rt care. She has more qualifications by a landslide vs Bernie. He has nearly none.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)You don't have to write essays.
So please, indulge me...
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)* Graduated from Yale Law School
* Worked as staff of a U.S. Senate subcommittee
* Staff of the Presidential Impeachment Inquiry Commitee,
advising the U.S. House Judiciary Committee during the Nixon impeachment proceedings.
* Faculty, University of Arkansas Law School
* Part-time chairman of the Legal Services Corporation, appointed by President Carter.
* Member of the Rose Law Firm
* National Law Journal named her twice one of the 100 most powerful lawyers in America
* Co-founded Arkansas Advocates for Children and Family
* Chaired the Arkansas Educational Standards Committee
* First Lady of Arkansas for 12 years
* First Lady of the United States of America for 8 years
* Chaired President Clinton's National Task Force on Health Care Reform
* Elected United States Senator from New York; served for eight years
* Served for five years as President Obama's Secretary of State, fourth in line of succession of the Presidency
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)is what policies she has implemented that has been good for USA and the world.
What policies has she advocated to benefit minorities, immigrants, foreign policies...
Such things.
What you gave what a resume of where she has worked or gone to school to.
It's like anyone having served in the army is a special accomplishment.
I have worked for more than half a dozen American corporations in five countries the last ten years!
So? What did I achieve during those years?
That is what I am asking! For you to give a few examples of what your candidate have done!
What has she done on the battle field in the senate, and in the committees and her corporate ties to benefit the American people?
That is what I am asking. Just to clear the confusion.
One thing is for sure,
Her time as SoS is NOT a time on her resume to brag about.
If anyone fucked up on the job 2 times like she did, they would be sacked. In fact, people who screw up ONCE would land on their arses outside.
Want me to count them up?
Syria!
Libya!
Her tenure as a senator is something I would not shout rah rah for either.
2 unnecessary wars, and the unconstitutional "Patriot" Act would disqualify her.
I am not sure whether Bernie voted for Afghanistan nor not, but if he did, I say he made a less than wise decision to vote for said invasion.
But Hillary? tsk tsk tsk tsk....
jpb33
(141 posts)HRC's accomplishments as SOC compared to John Kerry's accomplishments as SOC.
Successes under John Kerry's tenure as SOC compared to HRC tenure
John Kerry
Iran Nuclear Deal
Chemical weapons out of Syria
Opening of Cuba
Opened up Israel-Palestine peace talks
(even though the talks failed)
Paris climate deal
Hillary Clinton
0
John Kerry's Failures
0
Hillary Clinton's Failures
Intervention in Libya
Intervention in Syria
Set back & almost destroyed Pakistani
relations over CIA contractor who murdered 2 Pakistani agents in Pakistan
Overthrow of Democratically elected President of Honduras
ybbor
(1,555 posts)I especially find the first one you stated very telling.
You just changed my vote.
Wow! She did do a lot in her career!
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)He served as the mayor of a town for four two-year terms (elected by increasingly large margins four times) and only in 1992 went to the House. He has served in the House and Senate since that time and is the ranking member of the Budget Committee. His work for veterans and for ordinary people, his accompishments in terms of amendments to bills and influencing the direction of deliberations in Congress and in committees is excellent.
Hillary was elected twice to the Senate. That is the sum total of her political resume. She did non-profit work, but lots of people have done that. It does not qualify a person for the White House.
Nor does being the wife of a president. Would you want Laura Bush or Nancy Reagan to be president? First Lady is not the kind of political experience that qualifies a person for the position of the president.
And then there is the problem of Henry Kissinger. I had to read his first book way back in college. I have not liked him since then. Yet Hillary stated in this last debate that her foreign policy adviser is Kissinger. Kissinger has been accused by credible progressives of being a war criminal because of the roles he played in our policies in Viet Nam, Cambodia and Chile just to name a few of the fiascos in which he was involved. Kissinger served in Nixon's administration -- a Republican administration.
So Hillary picks the adviser of a Republican administration known for its brutality and eavesdropping on political opponents as well as its own employees for her top adviser on foreign policy????
How can anyone in their right mind support Hillary Clinton?
I sure can't.
And I have said here many times that I will vote for all Democrats on my ballot in November, but I will NEVER, EVER, NEVER, EVER vote for Hillary Clinton. I do not even consider her to be a Democrat no matter what she claims.
jpb33
(141 posts)HRC's accomplishments as SOC compared to John Kerry's accomplishments as SOC.
Successes under John Kerry's tenure as SOC compared to HRC tenure
John Kerry
Iran Nuclear Deal
Chemical weapons out of Syria
Opening of Cuba
Opened up Israel-Palestine peace talks
(even though the talks failed)
Paris climate deal
Hillary Clinton
0
John Kerry's Failures
0
Hillary Clinton's Failures
Intervention in Libya
Intervention in Syria
Set back & almost destroyed Pakistani
relations over CIA contractor who murdered 2 Pakistani agents in Pakistan
Overthrow of Democratically elected President of Honduras
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)..when I ask for actual achievements rather than a resume over work places...
So why should I as a veteran be endorsing a candidate with the wrap sheet like Hillary's?
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)This woman will only get more of our countrymen and women killed for nothing other than profit.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Primary voting dates run through mid-june
snort
(2,334 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)However, the election is 11 months away and I would expect that IF she becomes the nominee, the $$ spigot will be turned back on.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Let's see what the totals are by November.
Mudcat
(179 posts)GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)Volaris
(10,274 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)Give her time.
paleotn
(17,970 posts)....you don't have to keep buying it over and over again. She's purchased already. The rest is just maintenance and up keep.
questionseverything
(9,660 posts)and the foundation, personal speech fees and superpac money are not included....yet
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Myrina
(12,296 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)brutally, blindingly obvious to anyone not wearing blinders or has an IQ higher than a barnacle. This is a surprise?
SHRED
(28,136 posts)...how does it get out to the public in general?
Vinca
(50,304 posts)Half the population can't name the Vice President let alone have enough gumption to read about the candidates. I think that's why Trump is so popular. The nonthinking fools are basing their choice on a television show they've watched.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)sadly true, but funny
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Just like Romney and Bain.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)(this was posted in another thread but seems appropriate here too)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511257755#post2
now why do those look just a tad suggestive?
MisterP
(23,730 posts)establishment
I *hate* being inside such mislogic--it's like that Newspeak website I once found
lastone
(588 posts)fucks face when Bernie take the oath!
Buns_of_Fire
(17,196 posts)Which, I guess, is fitting...
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)go around to people and say "Hi! I'm from the Hillary camp! Support Hillary's fight against evil communism! Give your dollar here! #I'mSeriousMaddie"..
Isn't that one of the CEOs she was supposed to have wag her finger at?
speaktruthtopower
(800 posts)Fla Dem
(23,753 posts)" talked to some rich Wall Street bankers, and one of them an ex Goldman Sachs partner said when Hillary talked to us she told us to tighten our belts because things were going to change for Wall Street, no more banksters".
Just as credible.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)no more banksters".
LOL, no it's not. More credible just because you are more likely to believe it.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/05/politics/sanders-democratic-fundraisers/
Bernie Sanders complained on the campaign trail Friday that dialing for dollars "affects your entire being."
What he didn't mention: The Vermont senator and presidential candidate is a prolific fundraiser himself and has regularly benefited from the Democratic Party apparatus.
In recent years, Sanders has been billed as one of the hosts for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee's retreats for the "Majority Trust" -- an elite group of top donors who give more than $30,000 per year -- at Martha's Vineyard in the summer and Palm Beach, Florida, in the winter. CNN has obtained invitations that listed Sanders as a host for at least one Majority Trust event in each year since 2011.
The retreats are typically attended by 100 or more donors who have either contributed the annual legal maximum of $33,400 to the DSCC, raised more than $100,000 for the party or both.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-regular-luxurious-dscc-fundraising-retreats
During his 10 years on the Senate, Bernie Sanders has been a regular presence at luxurious Democratic fundraising retreats, according to more than a half-dozen lobbyists, donors and former Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee staff members with whom he attended the events. Sanders most recently appeared at one last July, shortly after he announced his presidential run....the party committee would wither without its largest donors, including industry lobbyists and wealthy individuals, who are feted at semi-annual DSCC retreats on Marthas Vineyard and in Palm Beach, Florida, which always feature a large group of Democratic senators who are brought to schmooze with donors. Sanders has been one of the more frequent attendees since entering the Senate in 2007, including two last year, once before and once after he declared his run.
The private events attract around 150 to 200 guests, according to a former DSCC staff member, about half of whom are lobbyists and half are large individual donors. To attend, guests had to donate the federal maximum (currently $33,400 a year) to the DSCC, or raise $100,000.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)It was after the meme that, well Bernie is not a Democrat and used to criticize the Democratic Party and also after the meme that Bernie didn't raise money for the Democratic Party.
Bernie, please note, cooperated in raising money for the Democratic Party as a whole from wealthy people. He did not take the bribes that most politicians take from the extremely wealthy. This kind of group fundraising is objectionable, but not nearly as objectionable as Hillary's giving speeches at the big banks and Bill Clinton's renting himself out to a for-profit college and then Hillary criticizing the idea of free tuition at state colleges and universities and other schools.
We are waiting for the next Hillary meme about Bernie's fundraising. The Hillary fans vacillate from pointing to Bernie as not a Democrat to pointing to Bernie as a fundraising shill for the Democratic Party.
What meme will Hillary's campaign pull out of the hat next to try to persuade voters who are concerned about the economy and all the corruption that Bernie is not our guy.
It's getting to be kind of a song and dance routine that we are all watching as Hillary's supporters jump from one absurd and irrelevant chorus against Bernie to another.
Meanwhile other than that she has some sort of experience that we are all a bit hard to identify, we hear no good reason for voting for Hillary rather than Bernie. Oh, there is the argument that she is a woman. But beyond that. She even managed to soil her foreign policy credentials by admitting that Henry Kissinger, accused by some of being a war criminal and not without possible reason, is her foreign policy adviser.
Hillary is making a mess of her campaign. It's just all over the place. The odor of desperation is in the air when it comes to Hillary.
And she is unable to deal with the real problems that are hurting American voters -- the deteriorating environment including poor quality water, a teetering economy, lack of good jobs, trade agreements that hurt our economy, low wages, low Social Security benefits, high student loan and other debt and constant war just to name a few.
Anyway, we already know that Bernie has partied with the rich in order to get donations for the Democratic Party. That doesn't make Hillary's selling herself to the rich and powerful any more endearing. This absurd attempt at negative campaigning against Bernie is not going to win any votes or even any good will for Hillary.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)your links are only relevant if they demonstrate that Sanders is SOOOO in bed with Wall St they have a pet name for their, er, pet...
MADem
(135,425 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)Surely such an insider as Bernie Sanders has his own nick. Damn, according to you he's sucking at the Wall St trough, implication just like Goldman Handcuffs. So yeah, burden on you
MADem
(135,425 posts)You want more? Go get it!
Arazi
(6,829 posts)As though it means Bernie Sanders has a nick like Golden Handcuffs aka Hillary Clinton's pet name on Wall St
So yeah, onus on you. Put up or shut up that Sanders has such a relationship he's been given a pet name on Wall St
MADem
(135,425 posts)who pigs out on the Double Stuffed, is what people like to do here.
I'm injecting a little reality into the mix.
You don't like it? You can solve that problem with a click.
And that last sentence of yours is called a strawman, and it's a rather clumsy and sad little one, too.
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)Bernie was asked to fundraise for the Dems and he did so. He received some of those fungible funds for his campaign. All those Brock false equivalency memes were debuked days and weeks ago. But I strongly suspect you already knew that and were merely trying to throw a smoke grenade for your bought-and-paid-for candidate.
Let me ask you a simple question: would a candidate with integrity hire David Brock? Yes or no?
MADem
(135,425 posts)What's reality is what is in those articles.
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Sanders is/has engaged in the same (albeit, no doubt less) conduct the he, and many here condemn?
It is you that is "implying" (no, really, saying) that HRC is a Wall Street crony ... because of her conduct(?); while, withholding that label from Sander ... despite his conduct.
Logical
(22,457 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)dlwickham
(3,316 posts)Bro
senz
(11,945 posts)raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)BRILLIANT!
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
Perogie
(687 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Anyone who isn't bothered by this has something wrong with them.
840high
(17,196 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)They have given her over $600,000 and think they own her and they don't care who knows it. This is the corrupt culture that we are fighting and some Conservative Democrats are supporting.
We have the highest infant mortality rate of all modern countries. We see 6 infants under a year old die for every 1,000 live births. This should be a disgrace. This is immoral because some put Goldman-Sachs and their profits above these children's lives.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)of yesteryear?
eridani
(51,907 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)redruddyred
(1,615 posts)dana_b
(11,546 posts)(where have I heard that before?? )
Elizabeth Warren