Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluedigger

(17,087 posts)
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:10 PM Feb 2016

Nate Silver: Bernie Sanders’s Path To The Nomination - Here are the states he needs to win.

How much trouble will Hillary Clinton be in if she loses in Nevada, where Democrats will caucus on Saturday? How close does Bernie Sanders need to come in South Carolina, which votes a week later? And which states are really “must-wins” for Sanders in March, April and beyond?

We can try to answer all of those questions with the help of the gigantic chart you’ll see below. On the left-hand side of the chart, you’ll find a projection for how each state might go if recent national polls are right, with Clinton ahead of Sanders by about 12 percentage points nationally. The right-hand side is more crucial: It shows how the states might line up if the vote were split 50-50 nationally. Since the Democrats’ delegate allocation is highly proportional to the vote in each state, that means Sanders will be on track to win the nomination if he consistently beats these 50-50 benchmarks. Conversely, Clinton will very probably win the nomination if Sanders fails to do so, especially since superdelegates would likely tip a nearly tied race toward Clinton.

The starting point for these estimates is state-by-state polling from Morning Consult, a non-partisan polling and media firm that has surveyed about 8,000 Democrats online since Jan. 1. That’s a lot of responses, although not enough to provide an adequate sample size for all 50 states; while there are about 800 respondents from California in the sample, for instance, there are only a dozen or so from Montana.

The solution is to blend the polling results with other data. In particular, I used exit polls to determine the nonwhite share of the Democratic electorate in each state and how each state lines up on a liberal-conservative scale (Sanders does better in white and liberal states). I also included the amount of money raised by Clinton and Sanders in each state in individual, itemized contributions, and their ratio of Facebook likes. In states like California where there’s an adequate sample size from the Morning Consult polling, the polling gets a fair amount of weight, but in the smaller states the other factors predominante. (For a more technical explanation of how this is accomplished, check out the footnotes.1)

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/bernie-sanderss-path-to-the-nomination/
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nate Silver: Bernie Sanders’s Path To The Nomination - Here are the states he needs to win. (Original Post) bluedigger Feb 2016 OP
A good analysis dana_b Feb 2016 #1
I guess I am not clear MuseRider Feb 2016 #2
It is listed as 3/5 Godhumor Feb 2016 #8
Thanks MuseRider Feb 2016 #9
Here's the chart from the article. Bernie's really gonna take it on the chin March 1st. Bucky Feb 2016 #3
Bernie is currently ahead in ma polling restorefreedom Feb 2016 #5
The trends show Sanders making up ground pretty much everywhere. kenn3d Feb 2016 #6
very nice looking graphics! nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #7
That's really interesting Blue_In_AK Feb 2016 #4
Nate's numbers vs. latest poll numbers: Chichiri Feb 2016 #10
Hasn't Morning Consult constantly been wrong in Hillary's favor? Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #11

MuseRider

(34,120 posts)
2. I guess I am not clear
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:39 PM
Feb 2016

about the list, not a surprise but...

His dates are wrong? Kansas has our caucus on March 5th not the 1st, not that many care about Kansas but I don't understand how it is set up. I sort of understand the rest of it, hopeless though I am.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
8. It is listed as 3/5
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:17 PM
Feb 2016

Look for the little gray line separating dates all the way to the left. Not the easiest thing to read (I would have put the date on the first state for the dates, not centered.).

MuseRider

(34,120 posts)
9. Thanks
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:18 PM
Feb 2016

bad day on top of charts that really confuse me! *sigh* sometimes I think I shoulda stayed in bed.

Bucky

(54,068 posts)
3. Here's the chart from the article. Bernie's really gonna take it on the chin March 1st.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:47 PM
Feb 2016

This does not look good. Clinton clean-sweeping Super Tuesday will give her a chance to try nudging him out of the race.



Sanders needs to flip Tennessee or Virginia or both (Tennessee is a better chance). If Clinton takes Colorado a/o Massachusetts, Sanders will be in hot water. Quite sobering.

kenn3d

(486 posts)
6. The trends show Sanders making up ground pretty much everywhere.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 09:47 PM
Feb 2016

Not an OP but I posted this in another thread today:


I would also note that Sanders did significantly BETTER than Nate's left-side chart in both IOWA and NH, and very likely will do better than expected in NV and SC also.

The Huff Pollster now has the National spread at +7.7 Clinton btw which is a new all-time low. Here's the current chart:

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
4. That's really interesting
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:47 PM
Feb 2016

and confirms what I've been sensing about the relative popularity of the two candidates in Alaska, if I'm reading this correctly.

Alaska's caucus is March 26.

Chichiri

(4,667 posts)
10. Nate's numbers vs. latest poll numbers:
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:27 PM
Feb 2016

The margin Bernie needs, versus the margin he currently has.

Nevada: Needs -3, has -1.
SC: Needs -11, has -21.
Vermont: Needs +49, has +76.
Mass.: Needs +11, has +7.
Oklahoma: Needs +2, has +2.
Tennessee: Needs -4, has -26.
Virginia: Needs -9, has -22.
Arkansas: Needs -20, has -25.
Texas: Needs -20, has -23.
Georgia: Needs -24, has -34.
Alabama: Needs -27, has -28.
Louisiana: Needs -22, has -31.

So except for Vermont and maybe Nevada, it's not looking very good for the Bernster.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
11. Hasn't Morning Consult constantly been wrong in Hillary's favor?
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 10:58 PM
Feb 2016

This entire analysis is based on them?



I'm not buying it.




Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Nate Silver: Bernie Sande...