2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forummainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)Hillyes
senz
(11,945 posts)Gotta look good!
JI7
(89,261 posts)JI7
(89,261 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)making assumptions to fill time.
Just more stuff people made up to cause drama...
She is on her way to Texas now, but was going to b in Nevada to speak.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)They, and Hill supporters.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Surprised that is something you dont understand.
senz
(11,945 posts)Plenty of Republicans and other airheads in this country.
Reassuring, eh?
DCBob
(24,689 posts)PonyUp
(1,680 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Q: How can you tell when Dr. Secretary Senator Clinton is lying?
A: She opens her mouth.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)On Sat Feb 20, 2016, 06:32 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Not that game...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1287723
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Over the top. Can we stop with these blatant RW talking points?
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Feb 20, 2016, 06:40 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is just snark, don't come to GDP if you can't stand it.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Her lips are moving.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I've been called to a lot of juries in GDP, and nearly all of them have been nasty, content-free snark about one candidate or another. Up till now, I've voted to leave, on the idea that it's OK to be critical of D leaders, but I've kinda hit my wall on that. DU (and GDP) is about discussion, and from now on I'm voting hide on attack/insult posts that add nothing of actual discussion value.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Voted to hide although I'm not exactly feeling warm and fuzzy towards Clinton or her supporters right now.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Winning elections is important so how can a member of DU justify bashing a Democratic candidate on a Democratic board.
senz
(11,945 posts)Wall Street: Hillary's against it!
Yeh yeh that's right!
Nedsdag
(2,437 posts)Here we go, people!
Deadshot
(384 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)ugh
senz
(11,945 posts)Not by a long shot, brother.
(Note to verbally aggressive Hill supporters: "brother" does not mean "bro."
Armstead
(47,803 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)like a row of toy soldiers. It's kinda cute.
Ooo, DWS is on MSNBC talking to Rachel....
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,998 posts)And she looks so glowingly hale and healthy. I just can't imagine how grueling the primary process is.
senz
(11,945 posts)Appearances matter!
ismnotwasm
(41,998 posts)Which is why I'm very pleased to support Hillary.
I pay a lot of attention.
senz
(11,945 posts)If so, that's great. Or, at least, it's a start.
ismnotwasm
(41,998 posts)For a quite a little while now
senz
(11,945 posts)We would loved to have had you there, ismnotwasm. You would have added to the discussion.
Please join us in the future.
TNProfessor
(83 posts)She sounded great.
still_one
(92,366 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)On Hill's donor list, they're called "pharmaceuticals."
still_one
(92,366 posts)Not even a little bit.
Response to still_one (Reply #34)
Kittycat This message was self-deleted by its author.
ismnotwasm
(41,998 posts)still_one
(92,366 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Bet you wish you could say that.