Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Why Syzygy

(18,928 posts)
Tue Oct 9, 2012, 04:49 PM Oct 2012

Doesn't the electoral college diminish the supposed benefits of polling?

Honest question. DU'ers know more than most.

A nation wide poll isn't going to tell much of the story. Is it?
The electoral college set up is going to split things up on election night.

So how can polling tell us anything at all?

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Doesn't the electoral college diminish the supposed benefits of polling? (Original Post) Why Syzygy Oct 2012 OP
State by state polls are used. Ptah Oct 2012 #1
National Polling Gives Us A Very Rough Approximation Of The State Of The Race DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #2
It depends... Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 #3
Yes, that's helpful Why Syzygy Oct 2012 #6
National polling tends to reflect the overall picture Savannahmann Oct 2012 #4
You have to poll each state and add the electoral votes to get the picture. LisaL Oct 2012 #5
Both national and state are useful TexasCPA Oct 2012 #7
 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
3. It depends...
Tue Oct 9, 2012, 04:58 PM
Oct 2012

There is always a correlation between strong nation-wide numbers and winning the electoral college. If a candidate leads nationally by ten, it's improbable he'll lose the electoral college. It's just mathematically very unlikely. Now, in terms of close races, yes, the national polls become less predictive.

Still, we assume most states don't act in a vacuum. Because of this, support all around indicates the direction of a race. If Obama loses the popular vote, it's unlikely he wins Ohio and the necessary swing states to win the electoral college. You see what I'm saying? State polls matter the most ... but the margins are directly impacted by the overall popular vote.

To give you an example ... look at 2000. Gore won the popular vote by .5%. That's less than a percentage point nationally - or an overall total of 543,895 votes. If Gore had doubled that, and won one million votes, while his lead in the popular vote only marginally increases, it would've been significant enough to probably shift New Hampshire, which he lost by 7,211 votes. With New Hampshire's electoral votes, Gore wins the presidency.

So, national polls don't decide the presidency, but the overall margin gives you an idea of who is likely to win the electoral college. Gore lost the electoral college because his popular vote margin was razor thin. Had he won the popular vote by a full percentage point, he carries New Hampshire and Florida ... winning the electoral vote 296 to 242 at the worst.

 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
4. National polling tends to reflect the overall picture
Tue Oct 9, 2012, 05:03 PM
Oct 2012

But the state by state, the electoral college is also looking threatening for us. Right now, according to Real Clear Politics, the count is President Obama 251 and Robmeblind 180. They need 270 to win. So obviously President Obama needs only 19 to win. But of the states left, the battlegrounds, he is losing traction to the lying SOB. So what does that mean for us? Well it means if we don't get serious, we're going to lose this election. Mittens has momentum right now, and from a strategic standpoint, Momentum is a mother to stop. If Ryan whips Biden as badly this week, then the topic for the news for two weeks straight is Romney winning everything in sight.

People are making up their minds which way to vote. Romney is putting out issue ads about how he is going to change things. We're putting out ads about Big Bird. We have to turn this around, or we will find ourselves sitting around astounded, surprised, and out of office on election night.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
5. You have to poll each state and add the electoral votes to get the picture.
Tue Oct 9, 2012, 05:05 PM
Oct 2012

National polls are pretty much useless.

TexasCPA

(527 posts)
7. Both national and state are useful
Tue Oct 9, 2012, 05:16 PM
Oct 2012

State polling lags behind the national polls; therefore the national can show you where the state polls are about to head.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Doesn't the electoral col...