I've been thinking about this very issue and wholeheartedly agree with you. I think the other problematic part of this is that it become very difficult to address it because of the chaos being complicated and that makes it difficult to begin unraveling it so you can provide a fix. I think this Nevada caucus, especially, is a primary example and a disgrace of the Democratic party. I am ashamed of what they are doing, though I know the standard reply will be "this is just politics," which is why I so strongly support the Sanders campaign.

That's what Dubya sneered at McCain after "Turdblossom" Rove concocted a lie about an adopted child in the McCain family. What's that tell you about the Clinton campaign's standards for honesty?

Well, nothing at all, of course.

Let's keep it real here.

But if some (apparently anonymous) Clinton supporters have shrugged and said, "hey, it's just politics" in regard to this or that complaint, is that really grounds to equate the Clinton campaign with the Bush/Rove campaign?

Democratic Party is broken internally at the "leadership" level across the board.

I wonder if they had to get back to the casino...

Or another Caucus.

Caucus proceeding without people being registered. Not enough registration forms.All seats filled. People waiting outside the door. Reports of long lines of people outside.

like hell."

They are using an variation of disaster capitalism. Create disorder and use it as a cover to steal.

if you want to make it as time-consuming , frustrating and difficult to vote as possible the caucus is a great way to do it. like Bernie said when voter turnout is high progressives win, when it is low we lose. hence the two party status quo does not want to see high voter turnout and will do everything they can to suppress the vote.

If I may differ.

too early in the morning

lots and lots chaos and lots and lots of money to be made by those with connections. Who cares if many die and many other lives are destroyed......

Would Hillary accept a final tally knowing it was rigged?
Of course she would.

And Remember the Whole World is watching and laughing//

...Just one will do.

2008, Huerta said Obama supporters engaged in intimidation and voter suppression against Latinos in Nevada. 2016, same thing about Sanders supporters in Nevada....
" Nevada, where she got almost 59 percent of the Latino vote, in spite of the oppression and the voter suppression and huge intimidation on the part of the Obama supporters of the Latino casino workers, they voted for Hillary. "
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/1/democratic_presidential_nomination_could_hinge_on

Huge intimidation. Huge. On the part of Obama supporters. Or more accurately, on the part of anyone who is running against Hillary no matter what the facts are.
She also said Obama lacks courage, lacks judgement and refused to associate with Latinos. It's the same scene, slightly rewritten and inserted into this cycle.

It's far too transparent for the internet age.

If we're just spewing random non sequiturs to voice our feelings on current events, I figured I'd get into the game!

Funny, when Sanders won NH, most Clinton supporters just congratulated him and moved on. I may have missed the passive aggressive insinuations of a conspiracy, but I did mostly follow along.

and then rob you blind.

which way do you turn and look? what happens in that moment of confusion?....just about anything...

chaos allows you to hide things in plain sight...

A Libertarian Economic Fantasy School

Look them up. They fall between Chuckle-nuts and Scary in the political spectrum.