Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Uncle Joe

(58,389 posts)
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 01:23 PM Feb 2016

Here's How Bernie Sanders Plans to Save Social Security Hint: The rich may not like it.



It's clear that the program needs an intervention. And Vermont Senator and Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has a plan.

Lifting the cap on taxable income
At a time when many are quick to write off Social Security as a lost cause, Sanders is intent on expanding Social Security to ensure that those who rely on benefits can retire in a reasonably comfortable, dignified fashion. To achieve this goal and promote the long-term sustainability of Social Security, Sanders wants to lift the payroll tax cap so that more money filters into the system.

For years, there's been a cap on income that's taxable for Social Security purposes. As of 2016, any earnings above $118,500 are not subject to Social Security taxes, which means that someone making $5 million a year will pay the same amount into Social Security as a person making just $120,000. Sanders is seeking to remove the payroll tax cap on all income above $250,000, including unearned income such as capital gains and dividends. Though this move would only impact the top 1.5% of earners in the country, the additional amounts collected would theoretically be enough to sustain full benefits and keep the Social Security trust fund solvent for the next 50 years.

Expanding benefits for those who need them
Sanders' goal is not only to preserve Social Security, but to expand it so that those receiving benefits see an increase of roughly $65 a month. That may not seem like much, but for retirees on a fixed income, every little bit makes a difference. Sanders also wants to see cost-of-living adjustments rise to better keep pace with inflation and rising expenses for retirees. Though living expenses for seniors have risen approximately 84% over the past 15 years, cost-of-living adjustments have failed to compensate, amounting to just a 41% rise in Social Security payments for beneficiaries. Sanders' plan is focused on ensuring a reasonably strong quality of life for low-income individuals, particularly those for whom Social Security is a primary source of income.

With several (Republican) candidates looking to cut Social Security benefits, Sanders' stance on Social Security may indeed be enough to sway voters his way. Of course, those in the top 1.5% of earners may not be quite as thrilled with his plan, but that's the beauty of democracy: No matter how much or how little you earn, your vote counts equally.

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/02/21/heres-how-bernie-sanders-plans-to-save-social-secu.aspx


6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's How Bernie Sanders Plans to Save Social Security Hint: The rich may not like it. (Original Post) Uncle Joe Feb 2016 OP
Question: Why is there a donut hole between $120k and $250K? TheProgressive Feb 2016 #1
I'm not sure, perhaps because of high cost of living areas combined with the political reality Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #2
P.S. Here's the hole Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #3
Interesting... TheProgressive Feb 2016 #4
I agree with you, TheProgressive Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #5
Recommend. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #6
 

TheProgressive

(1,656 posts)
1. Question: Why is there a donut hole between $120k and $250K?
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:05 PM
Feb 2016

If I read this right, the FICA would be from $0 to $120, then $250 and above.

Why the gap? I never have read an explanation for this...

Uncle Joe

(58,389 posts)
2. I'm not sure, perhaps because of high cost of living areas combined with the political reality
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:20 PM
Feb 2016

of making it easier to pass a future Congress.

Uncle Joe

(58,389 posts)
3. P.S. Here's the hole
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:37 PM
Feb 2016


How much does a us congressman make?

The Average Joe of Congress (there are 529 of them) gets paid $174,000 per year. But not everyone is average; the Speaker of the House gets $223,500 a year, while the majority and minority leaders of both the Senate and the House, along with the President Pro Tempore, get paid $193,400 per year.

What is the salary of a senator?
The annual salary of each senator, as of 2013, is $174,000; the president pro tempore and party leaders receive $193,400. In June 2003, at least 40 of the then-senators were millionaires.

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=congressional+salaries

 

TheProgressive

(1,656 posts)
4. Interesting...
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:48 PM
Feb 2016

Now this is making (non)sense. I did the math and it is an extra ~$8000/year for the $250k'ers.

Still, unless there is a more compelling reason, I would say all income is subject to SS.

Thanks for your insight on this...

Uncle Joe

(58,389 posts)
5. I agree with you, TheProgressive
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 02:58 PM
Feb 2016

on the other hand, having this convenient doughnut hole dramatically increases the chances of it passing a future Congress.

Not that I believe Congress wouldn't vote against their own financial interests,...well actually that's it, I highly doubt they would.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Here's How Bernie Sanders...