She is expecting a position within a Hillary white house but I hope we can show her the door instead.

Geez - who would da thunk it

If these people represent YOU, the YOU are part of the problem.

here in Florida, refuse to support Democrats, and fund-raise for GOP buddies? Her reason - working relationships. Yeah, we sure do get that.

Looks like it is tougher to be a member of DU than it is to chair the DNC, doesn't it?

No respect for the DNC while Debbie is there. Either the DNC should admit it is now a Third Way tool, or get rid of the DINOs.
I am guessing the DNC is now the Third Way's version of a Snap-On truck. At least it is, here in Florida.

Or did she outsmart the Bernie campaign... somehow...?

That was the "Bernie is most electable" meme. It's always somebody else's fault

It's hard to win. Letting people caucus without registering first, and not allowing Orthodox Jews to vote after hours. I'm glad you people feel comfortable winning at ANY cost. Cheating now will surly leave HilLIARy crying come Nov 2016. The more we see how she rolls, the less likely we will roll for her. And the GOP will roll over her. It will be 1984 all over again.

My eyes are now bleeding. Thanks Obama!

Another day another savage attack against fellow democrats.

This meme is getting old Bernsters, can't you find another excuse for the total failure of the Bernie revolutionary army to vote?

So everyone is on edge.

4 states have legalized for recreational use - including a vital swing state- and the public face of the DNC is in the NY Times going on about how they all should be sent to jail.

Some of the lamest "blame placing" I've seen in eons.


If all it takes is "WAAAH!!! DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ is EEEEEEVIL!!!" to stop people from voting, well, maybe they are getting what they deserve. But I don't think that's the case at all.


People who want to participate in the democratic process get off their asses and VOTE. People who like to shit stir on the internet, though, maybe they don't.

This brilliant analysis (the B word is used reservedly) fails to take into consideration that we had a SHITLOAD more CANDIDATES back in 08. A SHITLOAD more, that needed everything from more debates to more vetting to more ginning up excitement in differing camps.

Why, I remember Susan Sarandon vigorously stumping for that Iraq War loving John Edwards, I do! And who else was running? Why, JOE BIDEN--remember him? Chris Dodd!!! Mike Gravel!!! Bill Richardson!!!!!! And don't forget DU favorite, Fox News Analyst DENNIS KUCINICH!!! And there were a lot of others who contemplated, and then passed (many of those had tried in 04).

We're down to two now. Hell, we were down to two, for all intents and purposes, after IA.

Here's another analysis--there are a boatload of people who aren't like the poop flingers on the internet, who are Just Fine with whichever candidate the Democrats finally decide upon. There are--believe it or not--a lot of people out there who don't see much real daylight between Clinton and Sanders, and think that the attempt to starkly contrast them is just electioneering horse shit by partisan factions with special interests and a poor view of the Big Picture (that's on both sides, so none of that "Waaah they're being meeeeeean to BERRRRNIE" shit I keep getting whenever I make a point). They don't care which of the two gets it, because they're going to vote for that person, whosoever they might be. And they don't feel like standing in line or caucusing or whatever the hell--the outcome just DID NOT MATTER to them. They'll vote for the Dem at the end of the day. IN NOVEMBER.

smh.....

her program of support for candidates that didn't fit the Third Way agenda was zero...and her encouragement to run away from Obama was disastrous...

Get a grip. She's in charge of raising money.

The party leader is a man named Obama. Take your whines to him.

In 2014, she directly assisted in losses by refusing to support three Democrats, Miami-Dade Democratic Party chair Joe Garcia, former Hialeah Mayor Raul Martinez and businesswoman Annette Taddeo, who were challenging Republican Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart, Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, because she is 'friends' with her Republican colleagues.

her handling of the debate schedule was a work of art, too...her bullshit 'reasons' were lame enough, and then she talked herself, and her potential benefactor (part II), into a corner...which they managed to triangulate into looking like it was what they actually wanted to do all along...

let me know next time President Obama is actively involved in the operational machinations of the DNC...he is, as Presidents always are, the symbolic head of the Party, and HBO has only shown interest in anything directly going on in the DNC when he was running for re-election in 2012...

our party leader is.

DWS was chosen for that job (that she does part time because she has a full time job in the House) because she is a talented fundraiser. She doesn't need to be a "moral leader." That's OBAMA's job.

You remember him? He lives in the White House and is the leader of the free world.

smh!!


Keep playing that "Evil Debbie Wasserman Schultz" card, though, if you think it works for you....LOL! Beat up on a cancer survivor who kept working two full time jobs through chemo! Ascribe All Things Evil and Wrong to this One Mighty Woman!!!

It sounds a bit like one of those far-right wing crazytalk memes, but you go on with your bad self!

if it's just a part-time 'hobby' gig, let me know...

she sure seems to have a lot to do with the operations of the DNC...just unlocked the corporate donation thingy, didn't she...or did Obama make a call and tell her to do it...

screw 'moral' leader...who the hell claims that...she is supposed to direct traffic for the betterment of the Party...oh wait, I forgot, that is the Clinton/TW/DNC group...

well hell...she is doing great after all...

your responses mimic the best of the 'no need for change' segment of the Party...and you even doubled down with a cancer reference to accomplish what?

you like the way she is operating, fine...a lot of good Dems don't, and we have plenty of reasons, none of which are about her goddam health, lousy hair, eyeliner or any of that crap....

she is the epitome of the establishment of RepublicanLite™ as the direction of the 'new' Democratic Party...

or, maybe better...let her supporters list all of her accomplishments as head of the DNC...

at least you won't have to exhaust yourselves with the endeavor...shouldn't take long...

Oh, it doesn't exist because low voter turn out helps Hillary Clinton.

to get the voters to turn out for her if she makes it to the GE...

the opposition, regardless of their candidate, won't have to do much to energize their base to come out to VOTE AGAINST HER...they really won't have to spend much energy getting the base to vote for their candidate...STOPPING HILLARY will be their mantra...

she needs a plan...and the current HRC/TW/DNC program, which minimizes exposure/platform specifics/turnout, doesn't appear to have the kind of 'plan', nor the kind of operators, who can turn it 180° and actually crank up an electorate to turn out in support...

haven't seen it yet, anyway...

IT would be a train wreck.

about a week before the Iowas caucuses.

Title caught my attention. Too bad you did not provide an answer.

About Hillary and Bernie.

I like Bernie. I like what he says. I like most of his ideas. But he's a tough sell.
And Hillary is another Clinton.
Neither candidate is all that great, imo.

of the DNC and they have failed miserably at it under her leadership. Dems are going to lose in the GE unless enough independents get out to support our candidate. So far the independents are breaking for Sanders. I doubt they will engage, if Clinton is our candidate.

...we're the minority party, standing on the edge of irrelevance, desperately trying to emulate the other party while trying to draw nearly non-existent distinctions. "Vote for us! We're not as bad as they are!" There's a winning theme, custom made to attract a big voter turnout. Gosh, if that doesn't make you want to fight your way through snowdrifts and get to the polls, I don't know what will.

based on this:

http://graphics.wsj.com/elections/2016/polls/?embed=1&chart=chart-democrat-overall

Bernie will be our next President.

...drawing in tens of thousands supporters to his rallies. Why isn't that translating to higher turnouts, like President Obama did before him?