Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:22 PM Feb 2016

Sanders is now tied for delegates elected by voters, 51 to 51... So Clintons LOVE Citizen's United!

And wouldn't you know it, even though the disastrous Citizen's United decision by the SCOTUS horrifies Democrats by allowing flow of unlimited cash to super PACs from millionaires, billionaires, and even corporations...... It doesn't horrify the Clinton camp..... T.H.A.T.. MUCH!!!

These super PACs can take in as much money as they want, free from campaign finance limits adhered to by candidates.

Bernie Sander's campaign does not HAVE a super PAC, and we don't WANT one.

The Clinton campaign has several.

When this campaign began, those Clinton super PACs were supposed to stay on the sidelines during the primaries. That is no longer the case.

This is how the oligarchy has them by the short hairs. They're bidding their master well, aren't they?


48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders is now tied for delegates elected by voters, 51 to 51... So Clintons LOVE Citizen's United! (Original Post) MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 OP
Unfortunately..... daleanime Feb 2016 #1
Not a single fact in that argle bargle. giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #2
I think you may be factually mistaken 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #4
Well you might want to fine tune your thinking cap then giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #5
The only bad info I read was the Op neglected to point out two things Dragonfli Feb 2016 #25
I'm sure to have something from you any moment now... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #6
I'm not the one that posted a completely baseless OP as fact. giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #9
That's just it, my dear... there's nothing that IS baseless... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #11
Awww aren't you special. giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #12
Nothing special about the truth... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #14
The truth requires facts. giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #17
No... You need to read for meaning... I stated a fact. MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #18
You stating something doesn't make it factual. giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #20
What makes this not factual, gifted girl? MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #21
Your silly ass OP. giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #22
Here's Real Clear Politics... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #24
Lol, so the rest of your OP is just bullshit. giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #26
There's no bullshit... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #37
Psst... Hillary has found a way to coordinate with her SuperPac and she is running with it. kristopher Feb 2016 #46
Now now RobertEarl Feb 2016 #7
What kills me are the rules under C.N... It's a non-stop corporate stealth bomber! MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #16
It's a gift RobertEarl Feb 2016 #19
and much more, I'm sure. The ways are endless. libdem4life Feb 2016 #35
"You stating something doesn't make it factual." Lordquinton Feb 2016 #28
Nevermore merrily Feb 2016 #3
Weather or not it's VANE! MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #8
It's SO vane merrily Feb 2016 #10
Right ON! MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #15
right kgnu_fan Feb 2016 #13
As far as I understand it she also sadoldgirl Feb 2016 #23
And they have the audacity to question azmom Feb 2016 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author iandhr Feb 2016 #27
Super Pacs are anti-democratic. azmom Feb 2016 #29
So are super-delegates... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #36
I don't like Citizens United but....... Trust Buster Feb 2016 #31
Bad laws never have to have a mirror held up to them, do they? MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #40
I see the billions that Republicans will spend........ Trust Buster Feb 2016 #43
The question everyone must ask is: Can Hillary be trusted to put a justice that will overturn.. AZ Progressive Feb 2016 #32
You're kidding right? jonjon Feb 2016 #38
I think the better question put in a more broad manner is: davidpdx Feb 2016 #45
The Clintons are Republicans who call themselves Democrats. senz Feb 2016 #33
Kicking this statement... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #47
lol! senz Feb 2016 #48
Clintons Love Super Pacs? JGug1 Feb 2016 #34
What horse shit ... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #39
I'm pretty sure Hillary did not support citizens united gwheezie Feb 2016 #41
Until the rule helps you attain financial support... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #44
Fabulous For A Dark Horse libodem Feb 2016 #42

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
25. The only bad info I read was the Op neglected to point out two things
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 09:58 PM
Feb 2016

1) SuperPacs are not legally allowed to coordinate directly with the campaigns themselves and yet David Brock, the slime merchant is doing just that, by using a his typically sleazy tactics to take advantage of a loophole so clearly misused that even the Republicans aren't trying to use it.

2) The OP neglected to mention that the DNC chair not only arbitrarily reversed the ban he put in place on PAC money infusing the DLC, but then directly after doing so cut a huge check from the DLC SuperPac to one of Hillary's SuperPacs.

The info is not so much "bad" as you imply, but rather it is incomplete info.

I give the OP the benefit of the doubt about that as the main goal was not to point out such minutia but rather to put a spotlight on another of Hillary's many lies, this one where she promised to hold back the SupePac money until the GE, a promise broken quite recently and well known enough that even some of the MSM reported on it.

Hillary Clinton's superPAC seemed to be essentially sitting out the primary, saving its war chest to fight Republicans in the general election. Now that's changed.

In the 10 days since Bernie Sanders thumped Clinton in the New Hampshire Democratic primary, the pro-Clinton superPAC Priorities USA Action has spent $1.3 million on her behalf.

The money went for radio ads in South Carolina, which holds its Democratic primary on Feb. 27, plus digital ads and direct mail for future Democratic contests in Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana and Tennessee.


http://www.npr.org/2016/02/18/467216044/with-democratic-primary-fight-closer-pro-clinton-superpac-amps-it-up

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
11. That's just it, my dear... there's nothing that IS baseless...
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:35 PM
Feb 2016

Unless you say there is...

Still looking?

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
17. The truth requires facts.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 09:01 PM
Feb 2016

You stated an opinion, which is sorely lacking not only facts but evidence.

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
20. You stating something doesn't make it factual.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 09:06 PM
Feb 2016

Facts are backed up with evidence, not because you said so.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
21. What makes this not factual, gifted girl?
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 09:07 PM
Feb 2016

You obviously see something that won't hunt. Do tell us what it is.

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
22. Your silly ass OP.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 09:09 PM
Feb 2016

But instead of actually provide proof to back up your claims you'd rather be obtuse.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
24. Here's Real Clear Politics...
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 09:31 PM
Feb 2016

for my "silly ass OP"...

State Date Delegates Clinton Sanders Delegate
Allocation Open/
Closed

(2,382 Needed to Win) - 4763 500 70 - -
Delegates Won - 4051 51 51
Superdelegates - (712) 449 19


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/democratic_delegate_count.html

The definition of obtuse is someone who can't understand references to back up facts, even after they're presented.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
46. Psst... Hillary has found a way to coordinate with her SuperPac and she is running with it.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 11:23 PM
Feb 2016


How a super PAC plans to coordinate directly with Hillary Clinton’s campaign
By Matea Gold May 12, 2015



Hillary Clinton’s campaign plans to work in tight conjunction with an independent rapid-response group financed by unlimited donations, another novel form of political outsourcing that has emerged as a dominant practice in the 2016 presidential race.

On Tuesday, Correct the Record, a pro-Clinton rapid-response operation, announced it was splitting off from its parent American Bridge and will work in coordination with the Clinton campaign as a stand-alone super PAC. The group’s move was first reported by the New York Times.

That befuddled many campaign finance experts, who noted that super PACs, by definition, are political committees that solely do independent expenditures, which cannot be coordinated with a candidate or political party. Several said the relationship between the campaign and the super PAC would test the legal limits.

But Correct the Record believes it can avoid the coordination ban by relying on a 2006 Federal Election Commission regulation that declared that content posted online for free, such as blogs, is off limits from regulation. The “Internet exemption” said that such free postings do not constitute campaign expenditures, allowing independent groups to consult with candidates about the content they post on their sites. By adopting the measure, the FEC limited its online jurisdiction to regulating paid political ads.

The rules “totally exempt individuals who engage in political activity on the Internet from the restrictions of the campaign finance laws....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/05/12/how-a-super-pac-plans-to-coordinate-directly-with-hillary-clintons-campaign/


Hillary Clinton plans to coordinate directly with super PAC
By REENA FLORES CBS NEWS May 13, 2015, 10:00 AM

Hillary Clinton's campaign intends to coordinate directly with a newly formed super PAC able to receive unlimited donations, according to a Washington Post report.

The Democratic presidential candidate's campaign will work in conjunction with Correct the Record, an independent rapid-response team, previously a part of super PAC American Bridge, which conducts opposition research on Republican presidential candidates and possible GOP presidential candidates. The New York Times first reported Tuesday that Correct the Record would split from its parent organization to support the Clinton campaign.

Though Federal Election Commission (FEC) rules prohibit direct coordination between super PACs and declared candidates, Correct the Record believes it will be able to coordinate with Clinton without violating campaign finance regulations.

The FEC restricts paid internet political advertisements, making them subject to campaign spending limits and disclosure requirements. However, a 2006 FEC rule exempts "public communications" -- like unpaid posts on websites or blogs -- from such regulations. The rules were initially implemented as a safeguard against regulating the free speech of bloggers and other internet communications...
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-plans-to-coordinate-directly-with-super-pac/
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
7. Now now
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:31 PM
Feb 2016

It points out that even with all that money the H campaign isn't doing what everyone thought it would do.

Even the big money pundits are getting around to acknowledging Bernie, finally, and that after they had crowned H months ago.

They sure are in a tizzy... like the H campaign is.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
16. What kills me are the rules under C.N... It's a non-stop corporate stealth bomber!
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:57 PM
Feb 2016

Money/money/money/Money/money/money/Money/money/money/Money/money/money/Money/money/money/Money/money/money/Money/money/money/vMoney/money/money/Money/money/money/Money/money/

Lordquinton

(7,886 posts)
28. "You stating something doesn't make it factual."
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 10:21 PM
Feb 2016

"Facts are backed up with evidence, not because you said so."

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
8. Weather or not it's VANE!
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:33 PM
Feb 2016

It's the SAME of shitty weathervane!

Spin... Dodge.... LIE..... spin.... lather.... rinse.... repeat!

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
23. As far as I understand it she also
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 09:18 PM
Feb 2016

gets money from the DNC, which was mostly
meant for lower office holders.

Response to MrMickeysMom (Original post)

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
31. I don't like Citizens United but.......
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 10:36 PM
Feb 2016

It's the current rules of the road, like it or not. The Republicans have planned to spend billions on their eventual nominee. Now that Justice Scalia has passed, the money flowing in from the Right will be obscene. They realize that, due to the rapidly changing demographics in this country, they will only be able to ram their Fascist agenda down our throats by way of the Judiciary Branch. That's the whole ballgame to them. For us, the only chance to get rid of Citizens United is for a Democrat to reshape the Supreme Court. This is the absolute worst time to get sanctimonious about money and place our nominee in handcuffs while the Republicans shovel us under a pile of dirt.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
43. I see the billions that Republicans will spend........
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 11:11 PM
Feb 2016

For the right to reshape the Supreme Court in their vision as a great big Forrest fire. At first glance, it might sound counterintuitive to set a fire yourself in order to create a fire line to starve the fire of fuel. But fireman out west do that all the time. If a Republican gets to reshape the Supreme Court, Citizens United will be with us for a generation.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
32. The question everyone must ask is: Can Hillary be trusted to put a justice that will overturn..
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 10:38 PM
Feb 2016

Citizens United?

 

jonjon

(68 posts)
38. You're kidding right?
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 10:53 PM
Feb 2016


Of course not. That would be biting the hand that feeds her!


"The Snake was quickly revived by the warmth, and resuming its

natural instincts, bit its benefactor, inflicting on him a mortal wound.

"Oh," cried the Farmer, "Why did you bite me after I saved you?"

"You knew I was a snake when you picked me up," answered the Snake. "

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
45. I think the better question put in a more broad manner is:
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 11:22 PM
Feb 2016

Will Hillary Clinton do all she can to push for the overturning of Citizen's United?

That includes SC justices, laws, and support of a constitutional amendment.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
33. The Clintons are Republicans who call themselves Democrats.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 10:40 PM
Feb 2016

They are in, of, and for the 1%, the oligarchy. This is whom they identify with and whom they serve.

They are in the Democratic Party to siphon off votes from real Democrats/democrats. If they snooker the people into trusting them and win, they will assume the reins of government for the oligarchy and only for the oligarchy.

The people be damned.

JGug1

(320 posts)
34. Clintons Love Super Pacs?
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 10:41 PM
Feb 2016

No, the Clintons don't "love" super pacs. They are playing the game as it is being played today. I'm getting bored with these STUPID posts dissing Hillary Clinton. She is the most qualified, the most experienced candidate running. I love Bernie but I expect and hope that Hillary will win the nomination. If you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen. Super pacs are legal. Good lord willing, they won't be sometime after the next election and with Scalia gone. For now, if you don't play by the present rules, you lose.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
39. What horse shit ...
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 10:57 PM
Feb 2016

That type of logic is the reason that lobbying was successful enough to control what was once understood as "we are a nation of laws"...

The laws that enable a free society to decide by what means it's leadership is elected have been bastardized. And, you're trying to convince yourself that anyone who doesn't get in line with how this has been bastardized "can't take then HEAT".

How lost can you be? 25 posts since 2007, and you come out with this horse shit, "Good lord willing"?

You're going to need more than that. Here... Here's a pillow before your return to your Soma Holiday.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
44. Until the rule helps you attain financial support...
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 11:22 PM
Feb 2016

Then, she supported it by allowing herself funds made available BY it.
Of course, she wasn't for it before she was... but didn't have to take advantage of that. Yet, she's taken the money available BECAUSE of this bad law.

The interesting thing is that Bernie Sanders had the same choice. But he has seen all these years what that portends... That is at the base of where this nation's legislators and executives have landed. So, why should either Democrat take advantage of what IS made available to BOTH of them?

It's neck and neck IN SPITE of Bernie's never giving IN to Citizen's United!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders is now tied for d...