Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:55 AM Feb 2016

Politics ain't beanball say Hillary fans ad fucking nauseam

It's a nifty way of excusing any dirty trick out of the Clinton Brock led slime factories which, of course, take copious amounts of corporate and dark money.

You may not criticize any minority leader elected or not unless they support Bernie

If they support hill than, you are an ugly racist/xenophobe/hater if you offer even the mildest criticism. And that criticism will be twisted.

Politics ain't bean ball, you Bernie supporting tools. Only Bernie is supposed to be honorable and run a positive campaign. He promised and Hillary didn't. Politics ain't fucking bean ball. And dark money is fine, propaganda is fine, having a big chunk of resources directed at lying about Bernie is fine. Shows what a fighter Madame is!

Politics ain't beanball- unless Bernie is criticizing Hillary.




94 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Politics ain't beanball say Hillary fans ad fucking nauseam (Original Post) cali Feb 2016 OP
Dirty Tricks? 72DejaVu Feb 2016 #1
+1 bravenak Feb 2016 #2
Dirty trick like dog shit Brock saying Bernie is a racist cali Feb 2016 #3
You forgot misogynist. Fuddnik Feb 2016 #5
Oh, thanks for the clarification 72DejaVu Feb 2016 #6
No like this image spread around by them in 2008 CBGLuthier Feb 2016 #4
They'll probably distribute cartoon caricatures of Bernie... backscatter712 Feb 2016 #57
There is one, in a movie where he played Rabbi Manny Shevitz nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #63
+1 leftofcool Feb 2016 #11
funny how those activities are not considered dirty tricks by some but strategy and tactics instead DrDan Feb 2016 #15
Don't Forget Swiftboating! Chasstev365 Feb 2016 #24
big difference ellennelle Feb 2016 #30
There is 'dirty tricks' and there is ratfucking. Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #32
All of that has been debunked. Maedhros Feb 2016 #61
Ignoring is not debunking 72DejaVu Feb 2016 #72
Bernie Sanders Apologizes to Hillary Clinton for Stealing Voter Data. stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #7
And then Sanders Suporters started getting Clinton emails MaeScott Feb 2016 #9
I started getting Bernie e-mails months before any of this. Anyone who has been active in progressiv Tanuki Feb 2016 #18
yup, i'm one of those ellennelle Feb 2016 #31
I started getting emails from Maggie Hassan's campaign. frylock Feb 2016 #88
And then Bernie asked for an independent investigation Matt_in_STL Feb 2016 #21
Why didn't the DNC follow through on Clinton's request for an investigation? Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #76
I have a very packed ignore list. Yuugal Feb 2016 #8
Wow, didn't know it had been going on that long. senz Feb 2016 #13
I think DU is missing a potential revenue source here. Buns_of_Fire Feb 2016 #42
The ROFL emjoi was used a great deal in the run up to Iowa CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #60
test! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #14
exactly - the head-in-the-sand approach always wins at the end DrDan Feb 2016 #16
I think it is more like, if you want to respond like a petulant child Matt_in_STL Feb 2016 #22
great idea yourpaljoey Feb 2016 #52
I actually haven't had to Ignore many once primary season began MisterP Feb 2016 #89
that's 'beanbag.' wyldwolf Feb 2016 #10
HRC probably does see it as bean ball. Ken Burch Feb 2016 #29
No, that would be the domain of 'progressives' wyldwolf Feb 2016 #33
So "progressive" is now becoming a dirty word in the Democratic Party? Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #77
"progressive'" always has been (notice the quotes) wyldwolf Feb 2016 #90
Right , the wrong kind of progressive.... TheFarS1de Feb 2016 #94
Thank you. That was bugging the hell out of me. trof Feb 2016 #35
Quote from the late, great Harold Washington AngryAmish Feb 2016 #51
Clinton supporters have demanded Sanders' and his supporters' unilateral disarmament since day one. mhatrw Feb 2016 #12
Just the same, in a civilised society, politicians and their activists shouldn't Joe Chi Minh Feb 2016 #17
Come clean on one thing: Yuugal Feb 2016 #19
LOL Art_from_Ark Feb 2016 #40
I'm not saying. However, the Fonz reminded me of my brother, even to the leather jacket. Joe Chi Minh Feb 2016 #46
That's not where you'll get jumped. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #20
Yes. I don't think they are too rational. Joe Chi Minh Feb 2016 #58
Those "dirty tricks" is what's gonna hand the white house to the repugs in '16. PFunk1 Feb 2016 #23
You said it Pfunk! The more I learn about Hillary - her positions on issues & personal behavior - the more disgusted I get. InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2016 #54
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Feb 2016 #25
Even if she wins, Mbrow Feb 2016 #26
"Beanball"...I like it... Ken Burch Feb 2016 #27
I, for one, would like to hear more about how Hillary's ideas will reduce income. Inequality tk2kewl Feb 2016 #28
idealists give me as many chuckles as libertarians do..politics aint bean bags my friend... beachbum bob Feb 2016 #34
Except that Hillary is alienating the very people zalinda Feb 2016 #39
^^^^This. Right here. Times infinity. ^^^^ Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #79
"Madame." mac56 Feb 2016 #36
It works erlewyne Feb 2016 #37
Hillary collects the beans, and we on DU are spilling the beans. YOHABLO Feb 2016 #38
"If they support hill than" -- is there a hill running for president? betsuni Feb 2016 #41
The Clinton campaign and others have been treating Sanders with kids gloves compared to the GOP Gothmog Feb 2016 #43
Yeah but it would be all Clinton's fault! NastyRiffraff Feb 2016 #44
Yes, it is fortunate that the Sanders supporters will not be subject to what the GOP would use Gothmog Feb 2016 #59
Still in the anger stage.... workinclasszero Feb 2016 #45
Well zero, as I've said all along that hilly will be the nominee cali Feb 2016 #48
And if Bernie somehow pulls out the win workinclasszero Feb 2016 #50
I will never gladly vote for Hill, but as I've always said better a corrupt cali Feb 2016 #62
Well we still disagree in candidates... workinclasszero Feb 2016 #64
Sure, I'll take that, even if I don't think you understand fascism cali Feb 2016 #67
Whatever Trump/Cruz/RNC are selling then workinclasszero Feb 2016 #69
it's a really good thing Sanders supporters at DU have NEVER insulted Clinton or her supporters here geek tragedy Feb 2016 #47
Beanbag... SidDithers Feb 2016 #49
Let's recap the unofficial Enemies List the Bernie folks have compiled here at DU: geek tragedy Feb 2016 #53
I find Clinton's "friends" to be far more concerning than Sanders' "enemies". n/t hughee99 Feb 2016 #66
Clinton has a long list of allies, some good some pretty deplorable geek tragedy Feb 2016 #68
My concern is that there are people who will be giving her advice, likely "off the record", and hughee99 Feb 2016 #70
her inner circle will be fairly tight and well known geek tragedy Feb 2016 #71
Given her correnspondence with Blumenthal while at the state department, hughee99 Feb 2016 #73
Blumenthal is one of those we know she is in touch with--they go way back geek tragedy Feb 2016 #74
And that's my concern. Clinton has been around for a long time and goes "way back" with a number hughee99 Feb 2016 #78
it doesn't seem that Blumenthal had much effect on her at State geek tragedy Feb 2016 #80
Without knowing more about what they discussed, and what Clinton discussed with others, hughee99 Feb 2016 #81
we've seen all of his emails to her. nt geek tragedy Feb 2016 #82
Is this the only means by which Blumenthal can communicate with her? n/t hughee99 Feb 2016 #84
probably. she's in meetings etc all day geek tragedy Feb 2016 #85
Obama got to keep his private phone. hughee99 Feb 2016 #86
Perferct sumnmation -- Rough Tough Creampuffs, as my father used to say Armstead Feb 2016 #55
I wonder why . . . pdsimdars Feb 2016 #56
huh. one_voice Feb 2016 #65
Hillary's supporters have a distinctive tone, and it's very ugly. Marr Feb 2016 #75
I slightly disagree nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #83
Well, isn't that cute! nt ladjf Feb 2016 #87
... NuclearDem Feb 2016 #91
Politics ain't beanball. True that cali!!!!!! nt. NCTraveler Feb 2016 #92
Remind them that other Democratic candidates have NOT resorted to dirty tricks Matariki Feb 2016 #93

72DejaVu

(1,545 posts)
1. Dirty Tricks?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:09 AM
Feb 2016

Like breaching an opponent's data?
Faking newspaper endorsements?
Impersonating union officials?
Staffers voting from phony addresses?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
3. Dirty trick like dog shit Brock saying Bernie is a racist
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:14 AM
Feb 2016

Like Hill lying about him over and over. Like orchestrating surrogates to attack him as anti-immigrant, like falsely accusing him of soliciting wall street money. Camp Clinton is the same disgusting entity it was in 2008.




Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
5. You forgot misogynist.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:25 AM
Feb 2016

And communist, and suggester of a primary for Obama. And all the other horse shit the other respondent threw at you.

72DejaVu

(1,545 posts)
6. Oh, thanks for the clarification
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:28 AM
Feb 2016

That's the kind of stuff we used to call " taking an opposing position".

I'm an old fart and not used to this revolutionary language. Thanks!

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
4. No like this image spread around by them in 2008
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:24 AM
Feb 2016


I am sure her operatives are scouring the internet for a picture of Bernie in a yarmulke and wearing a prayer shawl before the Southern vote.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
57. They'll probably distribute cartoon caricatures of Bernie...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:10 PM
Feb 2016

...smirking evilly, rubbing his hands together, with a great big hooked nose...

Hillary's been so vile I wouldn't put antisemitic dog whistling beneath her.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
15. funny how those activities are not considered dirty tricks by some but strategy and tactics instead
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:14 AM
Feb 2016

Chasstev365

(5,191 posts)
24. Don't Forget Swiftboating!
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:07 AM
Feb 2016

The photo isn't really Bernie, he's a Jew not loyal to Isreal, & he's a commie, eh I mean Socailist.

ellennelle

(614 posts)
30. big difference
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:18 AM
Feb 2016

between random followers getting over-zealous,

and the campaign employing slash and burn strategies as a matter of policy.

i don't want the latter in the WH, thank you very much.

MaeScott

(878 posts)
9. And then Sanders Suporters started getting Clinton emails
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:42 AM
Feb 2016

But Clinton 's group didn't see and seize Bernie's data. And pay no mind to that man behind the curtain pulling levers, too. The Clinton camp got caught spying with the fake firewall kerfuffle and then pointed fingers at the sanders camp when they called it out and documented it. Sanders being the gentleman he is ,took the high road then, but he's wiser now and pushes back.

Tanuki

(14,918 posts)
18. I started getting Bernie e-mails months before any of this. Anyone who has been active in progressiv
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:39 AM
Feb 2016

politics or social causes gets tons of this type of thing because they all sell or exchange mailing lists. I can't believe people are trying to get mileage out of this. Some are naive but others know exactly how dishonest they are being when they put this out there. There is no truth at all to your statement that "the Clinton camp got caught spying..." Repeating a false statement doesn't make it true. Ironic that this whole thread is about things that are said ad nauseum. This meme is one of them.

ellennelle

(614 posts)
31. yup, i'm one of those
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:20 AM
Feb 2016

and i noticed it right away, was suspicious right away, and this was a couple days before i read anything about it online.

sheez, you HRCbots win one race outright and instead of winning graciously and moving on, this is what you got.

puke.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
21. And then Bernie asked for an independent investigation
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:59 AM
Feb 2016

And the DNC suddenly panicked, gave him access back, and refused to have that investigation conducted. But hey, nothing to see here.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
76. Why didn't the DNC follow through on Clinton's request for an investigation?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:04 PM
Feb 2016

Oh, wait, that's right. Sanders wanted that. What ever happened?

 

Yuugal

(2,281 posts)
8. I have a very packed ignore list.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:36 AM
Feb 2016

My plan is too block every last one I come into contact with here and silence them on my end. I just don't see any point in even listening to people who don't do "issues". I feel like every moment I waste on them could have been spent better. After 12 years here, I've seen enough thoughtful, well-written posts be responded to with a rofl smiley and zero content to know who they are, where they are from, and what they want.

Keep up the good fight Cali. I'm in it with you till the very end.

Edited to add: I only see posts 7 and 8. I'll fix that right now. If everyone would block these same few people they would be left talking to themselves and their threads would die quickly.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
13. Wow, didn't know it had been going on that long.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:06 AM
Feb 2016
After 12 years here, I've seen enough thoughtful, well-written posts be responded to with a rofl smiley and zero content


I've seen it and experienced it. Some just say, "Okay," with no further content.

If there are any people on this planet who deserve to be looked down upon and scorned, it is they.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,181 posts)
42. I think DU is missing a potential revenue source here.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:17 AM
Feb 2016

Start charging a nickel every time that damned ROFL emoji is used as the entire text of a response.

After 10+ years of never "ignoring" anyone, I finally broke down and put nine of the most foaming-at-the-mouth types on my list. That's all it took to make the place much more readable (thank you, Admins!).

Although I must say, there's a potential #10 out there who's rapidly circling the drain.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
60. The ROFL emjoi was used a great deal in the run up to Iowa
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:20 PM
Feb 2016

People who would express enthusiasm or positivity for Bernie would be met with mocking and with that ROFL emoji repeatedly.

If you've ever watched the BP Facebook page after the oil spill--you'll find that this tactic was used often. A PR agency took over BP's Facebook page and their schtick was to drive out people who tried to draw attention to the horrific reality of that oil spill.

Anyone who DARED to point out the oil-soaked birds or poisoned dolphins was mocked, laughed at and descended upon by a vicious gaggle of posters. They would scoff at anyone concerned about the Gulf, then accuse them of harming tourism in the Gulf--and then they'd collectively guffaw at these posters. It was like a hive of hateful sorority girls who would descend until the poster gave up and left.

This tactic is often used when someone is trying to demoralize you and bully you.

It's used by big PR agencies for big corporations who are fighting the American public, and unfortunately, some individuals use this tactic.

It's a form of bullying. It's a device used to make you feel like shit. Don't let it. Anyone who spends their time this way, is someone who isn't worthy of a second thought.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
16. exactly - the head-in-the-sand approach always wins at the end
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:17 AM
Feb 2016

if you can't beat 'em, put 'em on ignore . . .

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
22. I think it is more like, if you want to respond like a petulant child
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:01 AM
Feb 2016

People will ignore you like a petulant child.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
89. I actually haven't had to Ignore many once primary season began
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:23 PM
Feb 2016

because I've had them all on Ignore since DU3!

wyldwolf

(43,867 posts)
33. No, that would be the domain of 'progressives'
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:34 AM
Feb 2016

Who aren't clear on political history and processes.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
77. So "progressive" is now becoming a dirty word in the Democratic Party?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:06 PM
Feb 2016

Well, fuck me, then, I guess.

Does Clinton even want the support of progressives if she wins the nomination? If we're so shitty and stupid and ignorant, I can't see why she'd want us voting for her.

TheFarS1de

(1,017 posts)
94. Right , the wrong kind of progressive....
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:26 PM
Feb 2016

only central branch approved progressives are allowed to have an opinion . Got it .

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
12. Clinton supporters have demanded Sanders' and his supporters' unilateral disarmament since day one.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:03 AM
Feb 2016

What else is new? They will keep on demanding unilateral disarmament until a Republican takes over for Obama in the White House.

Joe Chi Minh

(15,229 posts)
17. Just the same, in a civilised society, politicians and their activists shouldn't
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:18 AM
Feb 2016

behave like animals. Standards are always applicable in human affairs, particularly in a sphere of a contentious nature.

Before any fellow DUers jump down my throat, I apologise to animals, and also to pre-industrial societies, whose hunter-gatherer ethic relating to governance seems pretty special.

 

Yuugal

(2,281 posts)
19. Come clean on one thing:
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:48 AM
Feb 2016

Did Joe Chi Minh really love Cha Chi Minh in real life or was it just for the tv show?

Joe Chi Minh

(15,229 posts)
46. I'm not saying. However, the Fonz reminded me of my brother, even to the leather jacket.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:40 PM
Feb 2016

Last edited Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:13 PM - Edit history (2)

we (my schoolmates and I) looked upon him and his Teddy Boy pals as very much larger than life - which they were. At leat the more namby-pamby kind of life that suited us better.

He wasn't academic, went to a very rough school and was perfectly suited to it. Quiet but a fearless fighter. Ended up in his early fifties with most of his teeth knocked out, when he went to help a pal who'd got into a 'contretemps' with some cane-cutters in Queensland, Australia.

I prefer not to risk having to eat my meals through a straw - which he could have ended up doing, had he not been killed in a car accident around Christmas by a drunken driver. I had my school-mates in stitches telling them about the antics he and his pals got up to ; one pal in particular, they would see in the upstairs of a large, local cafeteria called the ABC- they don't exist here any more - sporting a pork-pie hat and leaning in his chair against the wall, with his feet on the table. But he wore that hat properly, like Tuco's nemesis, the County Killer ; not Easter bonnet-style, like the Beastie Boys.

The trains from Enfield to Liverpool St never seemed to go more than 15 to 20 miles an hour, and just to generate a bit of excitement, he'd jump off a train while it was going, to run across the abutting back gardens of houses lining parts of the route, and out into the street in the front of the houses ! Oh, and Soho was Chinatown !

Albie had a pal, Sam, who, if anything, my brother reckoned was madder still, though in a different way. And being serious, not playing around. They had some fun at his expense occasionally, rocking his Austin 7 from side to side, as they sat in the back, while he was driving it.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
20. That's not where you'll get jumped.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:50 AM
Feb 2016

They always go to the 'you're DEHUMANIZING her and her supporters' line, and then ramble on about how that's the first step to genocide. Because obviously, using an insult that compares someone to a non-human thing is so much more likely to lead to genocide than one that's equally insulting, but based on human traits.

Sanders wins, next step FEMA camps for all Hillary supporters is how it goes in that line of reasoning, I think.

PFunk1

(185 posts)
23. Those "dirty tricks" is what's gonna hand the white house to the repugs in '16.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:07 AM
Feb 2016

And probably the house and senate too as they are driving base dems, most indies and others not only away from her. But from the party and voting all together. And no, I don't think "the lesser of two evils" thing will work this time as many now see the dems the same as the repugs only more "slicker".

Which is why this black man is glad of how Bernie is handling this. IMO he's acting more like a real dem than Hillary is.

(Oh, and I also go a growing ignore list now)

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,122 posts)
54. You said it Pfunk! The more I learn about Hillary - her positions on issues & personal behavior - the more disgusted I get.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:04 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
25. Kicked and recommended!
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:10 AM
Feb 2016

Don't get me started. I'll judge Hillary based on her ethics or obvious lack there of.

"Who are they going to vote for, Trump?"

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
27. "Beanball"...I like it...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:15 AM
Feb 2016

Chris Matthews could use it as the name of the coffee shop he'll run in retirement.

Johnny Cueto could be his business partner.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
28. I, for one, would like to hear more about how Hillary's ideas will reduce income. Inequality
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:15 AM
Feb 2016

And reverse our head long rush towards climate and ecological catastrophe

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
34. idealists give me as many chuckles as libertarians do..politics aint bean bags my friend...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:35 AM
Feb 2016

bernie is no match for onslaught that will be unleashed on him by conservative/dark money machine....compared to what hillary as dished out at bernie and supporters....if they can;t take this....they have no chance at all against the Koch brothers...which will portray Sanders as the the second coming of Lenin, Marx, and Neville Chamberlain all wrapped into one.....

zalinda

(5,621 posts)
39. Except that Hillary is alienating the very people
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:03 AM
Feb 2016

she will need to vote for her in the GE if she wins the nomination.

Z

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
79. ^^^^This. Right here. Times infinity. ^^^^
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:08 PM
Feb 2016

Progressives suck until she wants their votes. Then we HAVE to vote for here. Doesn't she/they realize how hard it is going to be to support her after all this shit.

betsuni

(25,537 posts)
41. "If they support hill than" -- is there a hill running for president?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:39 AM
Feb 2016

Hiller than what? Beanball. Bean ball. Which is it? What is it. Oh wait, I'm so silly thinking there's a point to this.

Gothmog

(145,313 posts)
43. The Clinton campaign and others have been treating Sanders with kids gloves compared to the GOP
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:20 AM
Feb 2016

The concept that the Clinton campaign has been very negative on Sanders is simply false when you look at what Sanders would be subject to if he was the Democratic nominee. VOX had a good article on the potential lines of attack that Sanders would be exposed to if Sanders was the nominee. http://www.vox.com/2016/2/3/10903404/gop-campaign-against-sanders One of the more interesting observations in the VOX analysis is the fact that Sanders have been treated with kids gloves compared to what Sanders would face if he was the Democratic nominee. I strongly agree with the VOX's position that the so-called negative attacks against Sander have been mild. Form the article:

I have no interest in litigating any of these attacks here. Like any Democrat elected president in 2016, Sanders wouldn't be able to get much done, but he would block attempts to roll back Obama's accomplishments and have a chance to fill a few Supreme Court vacancies.

When Sanders supporters discuss these attacks, though, they do so in tones of barely contained outrage, as though it is simply disgusting what they have to put up with. Questioning the practical achievability of single-payer health care. Impugning the broad electoral appeal of socialism. Is nothing sacred?

But c'mon. This stuff is patty-cakes compared with the brutalization he would face at the hands of the right in a general election.

His supporters would need to recalibrate their umbrage-o-meters in a serious way.

The attacks that would be levied against Sanders by the Kochs, the RNC candidate and others in a general election contest would make the so-called attacks against Sanders look like patty-cakes. The GOP and Kochs are not known for being nice or honest and as the article notes there are a ton of good topics available for attack. Raising taxes is never a good campaign platform (Just ask President Mondale). The GOP would also raise the socialism and age issues if Sanders was the nominee.

Again, I agree with the VOX position that so far, Sanders has not been subject to negative attacks close to what the GOP would use against Sanders and the attacks against Sanders if he was the nominee would be brutal. I urge Sanders supporters to read the VOX article to start to get a feel for what real negative attacks would look like.

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
44. Yeah but it would be all Clinton's fault!
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:06 PM
Feb 2016

She would be feeding the Republicans with the talking points! (Like they'd need it!)

You're right, Gothmog. If Bernie's supporters can't tolerate even mild criticism of their candidate now, there will be much, much worse coming at him should he win the nomination. Happily for them, it's unlikely that they'll find that out.

Gothmog

(145,313 posts)
59. Yes, it is fortunate that the Sanders supporters will not be subject to what the GOP would use
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:18 PM
Feb 2016

The "so-called attacks" and "scorched earth" tactics used by Clinton would pale in comparison to what the GOP, Rove and the Kochs would unleash on Sanders

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
48. Well zero, as I've said all along that hilly will be the nominee
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:45 PM
Feb 2016

I'm hardly newly grief stricken. I've had nothing but contempt for the tacky corrupt Clintons for close to twenty years.

And yes, it will be good to see them shuffling off the political stage. The one silver lining in hill losing white house.

They've disgusted me for a very long time.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
50. And if Bernie somehow pulls out the win
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:49 PM
Feb 2016

I will...gladly...pull the lever for him at my polling place vs any and all scumbag nazi republicans, I PROMISE you that cali!

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
62. I will never gladly vote for Hill, but as I've always said better a corrupt
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:24 PM
Feb 2016

dishonest dem than a corrupt, racist, sexist, batshit crazy republican.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
64. Well we still disagree in candidates...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:28 PM
Feb 2016

But I am grateful to you as a fellow democrat that we present a united front against the fascist republican party!

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
47. it's a really good thing Sanders supporters at DU have NEVER insulted Clinton or her supporters here
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:43 PM
Feb 2016

Thank goodness they have always been so respectful and inclusive, such that such complaints about Clinton supporters aren't thin-skinned hypocrisy.

It's so true that NO ONE has noticed Sanders supporters acting like assholes anywhere on the Internet. Totally never happened.

All of the mean people support Clinton.

Obviously,

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
53. Let's recap the unofficial Enemies List the Bernie folks have compiled here at DU:
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:04 PM
Feb 2016

Last edited Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:24 PM - Edit history (1)

1. Hillary Clinton
2. Bill Clinton
3. Dolores Huerta
4. John Lewis
5. Paul Krugman
6. Jared Bernstein
7. Rachel Maddow
8. Unions in Nevada
9. Barack Obama--good collection of quotes here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280101628
10. Black Lives Matter
11. Ta-Nehisi Coates
12. James Clyburn
13. Democratic voters in South Carolina (pending)
14. The Onion

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
68. Clinton has a long list of allies, some good some pretty deplorable
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:34 PM
Feb 2016

But, the notion that everyone who's an ally of Clinton is an enemy of all that is virtuous and good is pretty psychotic

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
70. My concern is that there are people who will be giving her advice, likely "off the record", and
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:45 PM
Feb 2016

they are exactly the sort of people I don't want giving any president advice on anything.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
71. her inner circle will be fairly tight and well known
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:49 PM
Feb 2016

will big donors and players try to get access etc, of course.

that's why people have to hold presidents accountable

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
73. Given her correnspondence with Blumenthal while at the state department,
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:58 PM
Feb 2016

I'm not sure her inner circle will be as tight as you think it will be. Clinton knows a lot of people, and when issues arise, I'm sure she'll talk with whoever she trusts, and the problem is that she and I don't trust the same people.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
74. Blumenthal is one of those we know she is in touch with--they go way back
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:59 PM
Feb 2016

He's a full-spectrum slimeball

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
78. And that's my concern. Clinton has been around for a long time and goes "way back" with a number
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:08 PM
Feb 2016

of full-spectrum slimeballs who will no doubt offer her advice. There's no way to tell how much influence they'll have (if any).

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
80. it doesn't seem that Blumenthal had much effect on her at State
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:11 PM
Feb 2016

the Clintons have a lot of old friends, and some of them are very good people (e.g. John Lewis and Dolores Huerta) and some of them are sleaze. We have to make sure the good voices get backed up with an external choir.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
81. Without knowing more about what they discussed, and what Clinton discussed with others,
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:14 PM
Feb 2016

I don't think there's any way to tell how much influence Blumenthal had.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
85. probably. she's in meetings etc all day
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:23 PM
Feb 2016

if she's Preznit, she won't be carrying around a private phone.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
56. I wonder why . . .
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:07 PM
Feb 2016

Then I wonder why they keep whining every time someone criticizes a policy or historic fact about Hillary. All I hear is that everyone is picking on poor little Hillary. The media is against her and one guy tweeting one tweet was turned into "Bernie Bros". . . .everyone is out to get poor little miss Hillary.
I wonder if anyone has ever won the Presidency by being a horribly misunderstood victim . . boo hoo hoo.
 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
75. Hillary's supporters have a distinctive tone, and it's very ugly.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:01 PM
Feb 2016

It was ugly when she ran against Obama, and it's just as ugly now.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
93. Remind them that other Democratic candidates have NOT resorted to dirty tricks
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:01 PM
Feb 2016

Obama, Kerry, Gore, Carter. It's not 'hardball' or 'baseball'. It's just slime.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Politics ain't beanball s...