Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wyldwolf

(43,867 posts)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:05 AM Feb 2016

This Is the DATE Bernie Sanders BERNS OUT



Not only will the revolution not be televised—at least in the case of Senator Bernie Sanders—it appears to have an expiration date.

Despite collecting millions in small-dollar donations and packing thousands of people into arenas around the country, the path to victory has narrowed sharply for Sanders. Some would argue that a window of opportunity slammed shut Sunday night in Nevada and that the upcoming race in South Carolina is the proverbial kitty-bar.

Sanders may well have the volunteers and the money to keep going, but after March 15 he’ll have to grapple with a new set of questions.

Undoubtedly, Sanders will lose the South Carolina primary set for Feb. 27. The bad news is—with the exception of possibly Vermont, Massachusetts and Wisconsin—he'll likely keep losing though April. The polls are not kind and, with less than two weeks before Super Tuesday, pulling off wins in states like Georgia, Virginia, North Carolina and Texas seem all but impossible. According to FiveThirtyEight.com, Clinton holds a 50-99 percent likelihood of winning some of the most delegate-rich and highly diverse states on the calendar.

The problem for Sanders is that he has nowhere to grow. Black voters, who will dominate many of the coming primaries, have not responded to his message. Even black millennials, thought to be good prospects, are breaking in favor of Clinton. They are, it appears by the ballots cast in Nevada and polling in upcoming states, voting with their parents and grandparents. It must be said that Clinton won the Nevada black vote by a 3-to-1 margin and that crossed age and income. And despite what entrance polling data said in Nevada, according to analysis published by NBC News, she may have won Hispanics as well.

if the trend holds, there is no path to victory left for Sanders. At this late stage in the campaign, unlike Republicans, there is limited growth potential for either candidate in such a small field.

More critically, one rationale for the Sanders candidacy dries up under scrutiny. Turnout numbers and the anticipated brief nature of the primary mean he has not and will not drive increased voter participation. The wave never arrived and there is no sign of it on the horizon.

One of the more vexing things about this election year is the open hostility to basic election math ...

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/22/this-is-the-date-bernie-sanders-berns-out.html
95 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This Is the DATE Bernie Sanders BERNS OUT (Original Post) wyldwolf Feb 2016 OP
Whistling past the grave yard.... haikugal Feb 2016 #1
Exactly. 51-51. peacebird Feb 2016 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Feb 2016 #69
K&R! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #2
the date Hillary evolves back to the right Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #3
Yup. Karma13612 Feb 2016 #6
they see it because they want it roguevalley Feb 2016 #95
Exactly mdbl Feb 2016 #13
not likely getagrip_already Feb 2016 #63
Also vexing I suppose - those who consistently believe Bernie is the Progressive candidate. highprincipleswork Feb 2016 #4
Ahem shawn703 Feb 2016 #8
are you saying he isn't??? Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #25
Whatever. I'm with the revolutionary. Nice pic by the way. Eom Karma13612 Feb 2016 #5
Disagree. mylye2222 Feb 2016 #7
this one paragraph should worry HRC as much as Bernie: islandmkl Feb 2016 #9
In the long run, increasing turnout may be a bigger problem for Hillary than Bernie... Kalidurga Feb 2016 #11
by 'in the long run' I'm referring to the situation where she is the nominee... islandmkl Feb 2016 #14
me too Kalidurga Feb 2016 #19
it's a primary where many will be happy with either one so coming out to vote in this particular saturnsring Feb 2016 #21
A couple of points Cosmocat Feb 2016 #34
"Feels" worse loyalsister Feb 2016 #60
making my point Cosmocat Feb 2016 #67
they definitely dont have the disdain for Sanders like they do Hillary 7962 Feb 2016 #45
An entire darkroom of negatives! jonjon Feb 2016 #84
The Republican circus and reality TV show got more viewers CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #66
If not for Bernie, I'd still be registered Independent, and odds are good, wouldn't bother. eom VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #70
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Feb 2016 #72
Why would you want him to Bern out? Ken Burch Feb 2016 #10
excellent question. Hiraeth Feb 2016 #37
WEll, the article is really about WANTING him to burn out per se.... Adrahil Feb 2016 #49
He is causing her to make progressive statements. raouldukelives Feb 2016 #52
Except the even slight possibility that he might win. Volaris Feb 2016 #54
The article was about facts. No one's *wants* were being discussed. Bucky Feb 2016 #59
One person's analysis does not equal "facts". Ken Burch Feb 2016 #62
You apparently don't understand the concept of analysis. Bucky Feb 2016 #65
Analysis is simply interpretation and theory. Ken Burch Feb 2016 #71
So we will have Hillary for the next 8 years.. too bad we could not have REAL change. secondwind Feb 2016 #12
I guess cannabis_flower Feb 2016 #15
What's the date? Poorly written article gives no "date." morningfog Feb 2016 #16
March 15... It's right there in the article. Agschmid Feb 2016 #29
The article says only that that date presents a new set of questions. morningfog Feb 2016 #40
You're calling the ballgame in the 3rd inning! Chasstev365 Feb 2016 #17
There are only a couple of things in which Obama and Sanders are alike. Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #31
Why would anyone be happy that jomin41 Feb 2016 #18
All citizens are We the people, there is not a separate group. Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #32
+1 deutsey Feb 2016 #50
I vote in the Pennsylvania primary Red Knight Feb 2016 #20
"One of the more vexing things about this election year is the open hostility to basic election djean111 Feb 2016 #22
yep, we might as well just give up now! Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #27
Nostradamus you are NOT. hobbit709 Feb 2016 #23
Who's throwing this shade on Bernie? Goldie Taylor? Who the hell is she? YOHABLO Feb 2016 #24
THE MOST vexing thing about this election year is... ellennelle Feb 2016 #26
Let's find out the Truth! Depaysement Feb 2016 #28
How sweet it is. nt William769 Feb 2016 #30
I call total bullshit on this "fact" Elmer S. E. Dump Feb 2016 #33
Bullshit! n/t RoccoR5955 Feb 2016 #35
4 out of 50 contests so far FreedomRain Feb 2016 #36
sorry, nate.not gonna happen restorefreedom Feb 2016 #38
Here are the 2008 Primary results and I dont recall INdemo Feb 2016 #39
As close as two or three days before Super Tuesday, Hillary said, "it will all be over Tuesday". ieoeja Feb 2016 #85
She is kinda like that now ..she is not well organized INdemo Feb 2016 #94
Just keep burning those bridges n/t gregcrawford Feb 2016 #41
So what is the going rate for a used soul these days? /nt demwing Feb 2016 #42
So the corrupt figures that dominate the party hope. cali Feb 2016 #43
Worst thingy Cryptoad Feb 2016 #44
That thought crossed my mind too. NurseJackie Feb 2016 #47
"we"? A bit disingenuous. eggplant Feb 2016 #53
precisely. He's the only one talking about the cause and Ilsa Feb 2016 #61
I agree workinclasszero Feb 2016 #76
or how about... rtracey Feb 2016 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author CobaltBlue Feb 2016 #82
wrong rtracey Feb 2016 #87
This message was self-deleted by its author CobaltBlue Feb 2016 #88
you are speaking in semantics rtracey Feb 2016 #89
This message was self-deleted by its author CobaltBlue Feb 2016 #90
yup rtracey Feb 2016 #92
This message was self-deleted by its author CobaltBlue Feb 2016 #93
Regardless of who you're for, there is one thing that is true..... markj757 Feb 2016 #51
Very true workinclasszero Feb 2016 #80
Then that will also be the day that Hillary and her supporters really have to go to work. vi5 Feb 2016 #55
I remember 3 words President Obama used in his 2008 campaign... dchill Feb 2016 #56
Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #64
You sound like a Republican. dchill Feb 2016 #68
Bernie's revolution will not expire. merrily Feb 2016 #57
The idea of Sanders being the nominee offically aaaaaa5a Feb 2016 #58
Sanders hasn't moved Hillary left. He's moved Hillary right John Poet Feb 2016 #78
Totally agree workinclasszero Feb 2016 #79
"At this late stage in the campaign" -- really? thesquanderer Feb 2016 #73
The date that millions of people check out of the system. frylock Feb 2016 #74
They have a foolproof solution for that whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #77
Scapegoating is always easier than self-reflection. frylock Feb 2016 #83
Woo!!!! workinclasszero Feb 2016 #75
Maybe the moon will fall out of the sky jonjon Feb 2016 #81
Thanks for the wonderful photo of Bernie. democrank Feb 2016 #86
I agree markj757 Feb 2016 #91

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
1. Whistling past the grave yard....
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:14 AM
Feb 2016

Despite all the blackouts and phoney accusations they are tied and we're only three states in. Not good enough Hillary.

Response to haikugal (Reply #1)

mdbl

(4,973 posts)
13. Exactly
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:40 AM
Feb 2016

We will all start to hear the "we all can work together" crap that hasn't worked for the 99% in 35 years.

getagrip_already

(14,764 posts)
63. not likely
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:23 AM
Feb 2016

she still wants your burned nuts to support her. She is smart enough to know she will NEVER get a repug vote, except maybe the delusional anti-trump types (but those will be few by election day). So she will tend the base like tomatoes in a garden.

You can't have it both ways. Most f you have dinged her for being calculating. If she is, she won't abandon the positions she has taken. That doesn't mean she won't sound sane and reasonable to indies. Of course, against trump/rubio/cruz, that isn't very hard.

The republicans will fall in line once they have a nom. The red indies will fall in line once they have a candidate.

Trumps path to the wh runs through the bubba patches of the swing states. If he can pick up FL, NC, OH, and PA, he has the prize. Nobody is going to tell me that isn't bubba country.

To win, either H or B needs to counter that. Staying in the corner isn't going to work. Even B would need to come to the center on some issues. And even he knows that.

Politics ain't pretty. Losing will suck, either in the primary or general. Both candidates know that. Both will keep the base and grow to the center. Both will work to get new voters out and keep existing voters voting.

Be passionate, support whoever you want, and vote for the nominee in the fall.

 

mylye2222

(2,992 posts)
7. Disagree.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:26 AM
Feb 2016

Bernie WILL be IN until Convention.
And he will win.
Sorry your dreams of a phony "primary" with a unique candidate vanished....

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
9. this one paragraph should worry HRC as much as Bernie:
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:29 AM
Feb 2016
"More critically, one rationale for the Sanders candidacy dries up under scrutiny. Turnout numbers and the anticipated brief nature of the primary mean he has not and will not drive increased voter participation. The wave never arrived and there is no sign of it on the horizon."

It doesn't look like the Clinton machine is getting out any voters, either...and, should she become the candidate, it also doesn't appear that there is any effort from her campaign to court new voters...or if there is, it isn't apparently working any better than the supposed failure of the Sander's campaign...

what if, without Bernie, the Democratic turnout was even lower?

The Repubs are having huge turnouts, maybe because of all the candidates, and it appears that they have energized their base...and we all know who a great deal of that base hate...

In the long run, increasing turnout may be a bigger problem for Hillary than Bernie...

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
11. In the long run, increasing turnout may be a bigger problem for Hillary than Bernie...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:35 AM
Feb 2016

It's probably a bigger problem for us.

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
14. by 'in the long run' I'm referring to the situation where she is the nominee...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:40 AM
Feb 2016

I'm having trouble seeing her motivating a large turnout beyond what we are seeing now...

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
19. me too
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:01 AM
Feb 2016

turn out for the primaries being down not a huge deal yet. It's only a problem for Democrats if the pattern continues into the GE.

 

saturnsring

(1,832 posts)
21. it's a primary where many will be happy with either one so coming out to vote in this particular
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:05 AM
Feb 2016

primary is seen as less important . imo

Cosmocat

(14,566 posts)
34. A couple of points
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:45 AM
Feb 2016

First, people want to look harder to find the turnout issue than is necessary.

It is a repeat of 99. The country is coming of a democratic president who has done a pretty good job, but because republicans have thrown an 8 year hissy fit throwing shit like deranged lunatics, the country "feels" things are worse than they are, not saying they great. But, what the republicans do is intentional. They know they can wear this country down with this shit, and that they frame it was "they are all the same!"

So, the sitting POTUS, even though he has done a good job and in this case has taken more shit than any person in human history, is seen as the problem as much if not more than republican ass hatery.

SO ... this country, in all its wonderful obliviousness, is willing to hand POTUS to republicans just to shut them the fuck up IF they run a candidate who spouts some happy happy bullshit like Reagen (morning in america) and Bush II (compasionate conservatism). See, Marco Rubio with his Reagen rip off house on the hill bullshit.

This is the general historical trend, the party in power in the white house ALWAYS suffers in turn out vs the out of party power for the most part. It isn't some random event that the largest democratic turnout in the last quarter century were when dipshit was POTUS (06 & 08).

2) yes, turnout will be a bigger issue for Hillary.

3) But, there is this thing that lies between now and the general election called a primary, and for all the puffy bravado about the general with Bernie, he still is an underdog to get the nomination.

4) Unfortunately, Bernie supports are burning every boat and bridge they possibly can. Hill had issues as a general election candidate, but the Bernistas have ginned themselves up into the republican Hillary is Satan mindset enough it is going to be hard for them to come behind her if she wins the nomination.

5) As the same time, their hillary derangement is so full on tea party hate filled, they talk down and attack Hillary supporters so much they are basically telling them to screw off in the general.

6) It is starting to get to the point that it will be Sanders or bust.



loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
60. "Feels" worse
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:13 AM
Feb 2016

We have 3% unemployment and 19% poverty. People are working two jobs and still can't afford to buy health insurance. People are legitimately hurting and Obamacare has added pressure. Meanwhile they keep hearing how great things are. The want things to be just a little easier and they want to feel like their kids have a fighting chance. They see none with the candidate who not only has no interest in trying, she dismisses their experience by saying it is a pipe dream for them to want more.
No, they are not going to vote for more of the same when they are told not to bother to imagine their kids have a shot at something better.

Cosmocat

(14,566 posts)
67. making my point
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:41 AM
Feb 2016

Things are better today than they were the day BHO took over, by a far sight.

I agree on your larger economic points, but this is how "feel" trumps reason.

I am voting Bernie, but sorry, it won't change all that much, if at all with him as POTUS, either.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
45. they definitely dont have the disdain for Sanders like they do Hillary
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:24 AM
Feb 2016

They'll call bernie "Socialist", but theres not a lot of other negatives to say. Hillary has a notebook full of negatives

Response to islandmkl (Reply #9)

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
49. WEll, the article is really about WANTING him to burn out per se....
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:44 AM
Feb 2016

It's about an analysis of what is likely to happen. Bernie was (and for sake of argument, let's say IS) close to breaking out. But in order to do so, he needs to do well on Super Tuesday. The simply fact is that if he can't do well on Super Tuesday, then his path to the nomination does not look very credible. As the article says, it's just election math. If Sanders had won Nevada (even by a squeaker), it could be argued that he had sufficiently eaten into Clinton's base to over-perform on Super Tuesday.... acquiring enough delegates, if not necessarily winning, to challenge Clinton once the race turns to more Bernie-friendly states. There are a number of models showing how well Bernie need to do, delegate-wise, to be on-track for the nomination. Some of these models consider super-delegates, some don't. But even the models NOT considering super-delegates are showing Bernie behind the power curve. Through super-delegates into the mix and the picture is even worse.

TL,DR : If SC and Super Tuesday go as currently expected, what exactly is Bernie's path to the nomination? I mean short of a hand-wavy "And here a miracle happens" kind of event, how does it work?

I wouldn't rule him out yet. Bernie did much better than I thought he would, so I am out of the prediction game for this primary. I thought Bernie would top out at 30% nationally, and I was clearly wrong there!

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
52. He is causing her to make progressive statements.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:49 AM
Feb 2016

The harder she tries to make herself sound like a liberal, the more backtracking she will have to do later. The sooner that ends for them, the better.

Bucky

(54,027 posts)
59. The article was about facts. No one's *wants* were being discussed.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:11 AM
Feb 2016

I hate it when people shoot the messenger. Looking down the road for potholes is not treason.

Bucky

(54,027 posts)
65. You apparently don't understand the concept of analysis.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:32 AM
Feb 2016

No, an analysis is not about opinion. It's about having a deeper understanding of facts.

Seriously, quit shooting the messengers.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
40. The article says only that that date presents a new set of questions.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:14 AM
Feb 2016

Which is different than a "bern out" date or an "expiration date."

Chasstev365

(5,191 posts)
17. You're calling the ballgame in the 3rd inning!
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:52 AM
Feb 2016

Hillary has all the money and backing of the DC establishment. Funny, wasn't that the case in 2008?

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
31. There are only a couple of things in which Obama and Sanders are alike.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:31 AM
Feb 2016

Both have served as Senators and both have run against Hillary. Obama gave a great key note speech at the 2004 DNC Convention, he got the attention of many Americans. Obama presented an agenda which was reasonable, be has been a good president.

Red Knight

(704 posts)
20. I vote in the Pennsylvania primary
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:04 AM
Feb 2016

which isn't until late April.

I really wanted Bernie to stick around no matter what because I would love to vote FOR someone rather than against someone else.

Bernie is the first politician in my lifetime who matches my voice. He is my voice. Even if it's hopeless I would love to have the opportunity to push that button with his name on it and be heard.

Hang in there Bernie--it matters to a lot of us.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
22. "One of the more vexing things about this election year is the open hostility to basic election
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:05 AM
Feb 2016

math" - oh my, we are not all following orders, y'all!

Yeah, we should not care about issues like war, fracking, Third Way evisceration of social programs, increased H-1B visas or stuff like that, right?

Those things are things that Hillary is in favor of. Things I believe she will do to us. Not getting on that bandwagon. Fuck that.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
24. Who's throwing this shade on Bernie? Goldie Taylor? Who the hell is she?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:13 AM
Feb 2016

And who really cares. Hillary does not have this in the bag. This whole article is full of B.S.
I got news for this chick Goldie .............you are dead wrong. Just another puff piece bought and paid for by the Clinton Machine.

ellennelle

(614 posts)
26. THE MOST vexing thing about this election year is...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:16 AM
Feb 2016

the open hostility to the fact that people have had it up to their eyeballs with the system that operates with such convoluted math!

MAKE THE SYSTEM DEMOCRATIC ALREADY!!!

everyone votes, each vote is counted.

simple system, simple math.

why is this so hard?

oh yeah; THE SYSTEM IS BROKEN!!

 

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)
33. I call total bullshit on this "fact"
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:42 AM
Feb 2016
Black voters, who will dominate many of the coming primaries, have not responded to his message. Even black millennials, thought to be good prospects, are breaking in favor of Clinton.

FreedomRain

(413 posts)
36. 4 out of 50 contests so far
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:51 AM
Feb 2016

most vote totals within 5%

way too early to talk about either candidate leaving. Maybe after Super Tuesday, but probably not even then.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
38. sorry, nate.not gonna happen
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:11 AM
Feb 2016

he is in till philly, and if you think they are going to drive him out so they can plug in an establishement stooge when hillary has to step down, you can

BITE ME!!

(comment directed to nate not the op)


carry on....


INdemo

(6,994 posts)
39. Here are the 2008 Primary results and I dont recall
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:13 AM
Feb 2016

Hillary supporters declaring a victory and the end for Obama then in February.....My god Hillary has won one primary with questionable results...and practices in various Precincts..She tied Sanders in Iowa and DWS refused an audit of the rest of the 1680 Precincts because she feared what the official results might show and she got got trounced in NH..
(Scroll down the page and winning candidate is highlighted in Blue)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
85. As close as two or three days before Super Tuesday, Hillary said, "it will all be over Tuesday".
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:55 PM
Feb 2016

It was a very common claim by Hillary supporters in 2008. Everyone pretty much agrees that one of the reasons Hillary suffered a string of primary defeats following Super Tuesday is that she had zero plans for even running in the primary after that date. The Clintons themselves appear to believe that was the sole reason for her loss ignoring the fact that rural people really hate her.


INdemo

(6,994 posts)
94. She is kinda like that now ..she is not well organized
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:16 PM
Feb 2016

in many of the Super Tuesday states because she expected this to be over by now and she is not well funded for all of them
So it will be interesting

Even The Democrats in Congress (The Republicrats) are wondering how she will handle the Super Tuesday States and after.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
44. Worst thingy
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:24 AM
Feb 2016

Bern has set back the Progressive cause 50 years. We picked the wrong person to carry our banner!

eggplant

(3,911 posts)
53. "we"? A bit disingenuous.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:50 AM
Feb 2016

And no, he hasn't set any cause back. If he wasn't running, there would be no "cause" to set back.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
61. precisely. He's the only one talking about the cause and
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:15 AM
Feb 2016

"walking the cause", vs being duplicitous.

I'm sick to death of the damage inflicted by the right and 3rd-way "Dems".

 

rtracey

(2,062 posts)
46. or how about...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:26 AM
Feb 2016

This is the date that the democrats lose to a narcissistic, arrogant POS republican who because at the end of the primary season one campaign did not win, and the followers refuse to put party first. This allows this new GOP president to select the new supreme court justice, or 2, or 3 and this allows the ACA to go under and this allows immigration to fail, and this allows the legal marriage of gays to be reversed, and this allows the seniors and the poor to stay poor and not have a chance. etc, etc, etc.

Party must come first. We as democrats must do everything e=we can to elect a democratic president and democratically controlled congress. DU...this must be your goal...to spread this message that party MUST come 1st.

Response to rtracey (Reply #46)

 

rtracey

(2,062 posts)
87. wrong
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:29 PM
Feb 2016

Everything I wrote is accurate, and will happen if we do not vote in a democrat as president and senate. Mark my work CobaltBlue. You are speaking like a republican.

1. The congress has attempted to vote ACA out over 50 times. The veto pen of a democrat as president has saved it. A republican president will not.
2. If a democratic controlled senate is not in the cards this election, and McConnell has his way, and a GOP is president, the progressive candidate for the court is not in the scene. The court will again and continue to be conservative.... and 2-3 justices in the next 4 years may be in doubt for health reasons....
3. The middle class will suffer again as we did under Bush. The rich will get breaks, and S.S. may go private.
etc.....

say what you wish.....mark my words, it happened in 2000..... it can happen in 2016

Response to rtracey (Reply #87)

 

rtracey

(2,062 posts)
89. you are speaking in semantics
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:13 PM
Feb 2016

Anyone can vote anyway they wish. I would never tell anyone HOW to vote. I can and will tell them WHO to vote for. They have their own minds and hearts. I can not change what they feel.

facts are fact, truth is truth....

what I have stated are facts..... tell me what I wrote is not a fact

that the GOP has voted to repeal over and over. The fact is Obama saved by veto. ALL GOP candidates have said they will appeal Obamacare the first thing. WITH A GOP CONTROLLED HOUSE AND SENATE.... they will succeed.

The Senate has control over the supreme court nomination. All the candidates have stated they should replace Scalia with a conservative justice. Even though there is a 60 vote to overide a filibuster, the "atomic" option is available, with a 51 vote majority. GOP controlled Senate has 54 senators.... this depends on McConnell's arrogance or not. There are some justices that are not in good health. This is NOT a fact, but the possibility of other justices needing replacement is very high....

I know candidates lie, most all of them do. Reality is reality.

Response to rtracey (Reply #89)

 

rtracey

(2,062 posts)
92. yup
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:36 PM
Feb 2016

I never said they couldn't. I did say party MUST come first. I believe both Sanders and Clinton would agree. If anyone on this forum wishes to vote GOP, then they need be asked to leave and go the a right wing forum.

Response to rtracey (Reply #92)

 

markj757

(194 posts)
51. Regardless of who you're for, there is one thing that is true.....
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:48 AM
Feb 2016

Last edited Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:27 PM - Edit history (1)

After Hillary's win in Nevada, the momentum has shifted from Hillary needing to stop Bernie, to Bernie needing to stop Hillary.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
55. Then that will also be the day that Hillary and her supporters really have to go to work.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:55 AM
Feb 2016

To convince everyone why they should support hillary in the GE.

Do any of them actually plan on doing that, or will they be content to just shout "President Trump!" or "President Rubio!" over and over again?


dchill

(38,505 posts)
56. I remember 3 words President Obama used in his 2008 campaign...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:56 AM
Feb 2016

Hoodwinked.
Bamboozled.
Okey-doke.

Who was he talking about?

Hint: It wasn't Bernie Sanders.

You were warned 8 years ago.

Response to dchill (Reply #56)

dchill

(38,505 posts)
68. You sound like a Republican.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:46 AM
Feb 2016

I blame the failures on the institutionalized racism of the Republican Congress. And yes, the ACA is the "achievement" of the congress - no government option, high cost and all.

aaaaaa5a

(4,667 posts)
58. The idea of Sanders being the nominee offically
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:07 AM
Feb 2016

ended this weekend. He did not expand the electorate the way he needed. Turnout has actually been down across the board compared to 2008. This proves the ridiculous notion that Sanders was like Obama in 2008 to be false.

The Sanders campaign has not done well with AA voters. And their strength with Hispanic voters is debatable. Inspiring young people in college towns is not enough to get to the White House. It's not even enough to get the nomination. Sanders coalition is not big enough. And his supporters are NOT flocking to the polls in great numbers.

A new poll out of Massachusetts shows Bernie is tied with Clinton in the state. Yes, even in a state loaded with White Liberals and the home of Elizabeth Warren is not enough to guarantee a Sanders victory.

Sanders has run a great campaign. He got further than almost anyone thought he would. He has moved Clinton and the party left. And that is a good thing. But by the end of March, he will be a protest candidate. Hillary Clinton will be the nominee.

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
78. Sanders hasn't moved Hillary left. He's moved Hillary right
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:40 PM
Feb 2016

into bed with Kissinger.





Wait, my mistake. She was there already.

thesquanderer

(11,990 posts)
73. "At this late stage in the campaign" -- really?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:04 PM
Feb 2016

It's February. We're 3 contests in, the two of them are tied in delegates (and Bernie appears to be ahead in popular vote). I agree that the math still favors Hillary, but I'd hardly call this late in the campaign, and she's certainly not blowing him out. Basically she's got a virtual tie, a decisive loss, and a win that was much narrower than had been expected a month earlier. All the articles that are saying it's late, it's decided, come off merely as attempts to create a self-fulfilling prophecy.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
77. They have a foolproof solution for that
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:40 PM
Feb 2016

They'll just insult Bernie supporter's racist, commie, libertarian, unicorn fart huffing asses into line. At least that's been the winning strategy so far.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
75. Woo!!!!
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:36 PM
Feb 2016

Now that's a cold ass shot of reality for Bernie fans!

YEAH buddy!

Nevada changed everything about these primaries and SC and Super Tuesday is going to seal the deal for Hillary!

Bernie fans have until March 1st to try to stop the inevitable primary victory of Hillary Clinton!

Yall better get busy!

 

markj757

(194 posts)
91. I agree
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:34 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie is one of the most decent men to for run president in my lifetime, and that's saying something, because before Bernie ran, if you were to ask me that question, Obama would be first to come to mind.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This Is the DATE Bernie S...