2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton's message is now so tightly scripted that her supporters can't articulate it
She is playing populist right now but she can't say anything that will alienate her biggest donors. If she wants their checks she has to do their bidding. With Sanders framing the issue of big money influence, the spotlight is on.
To try and level the playing field, Team Clinton came up with the meme that "Sanders is a one issue candidate." This is in part because they don't want to answer to all of the issues and differences Sanders has raised. They can't without sounding less populist but even the one Sanders issue that they do acknowledge, big money in politics, cuts strongly against Clinton.
They are stuck playing defense and believe that 'the best defense is a good offense.' Since her supporters can't make a coherent case for why any of us who aren't comfortable insiders should vote for Hillary, they spend their time trying to tear down Bernie. It all becomes very muddled in a hurry as Team Clinton takes two contradictory positions on almost everything. For example, they admit big money in politics is a corrupting influence but say 'everybody does it so they have to do it too.' On issue after issue, they plead guilty and then claim everyone does it. Called out on this, they are desperate to find some one time that Sanders also sold out (and how's that going btw?)
It may blunt the momentum but defense doesn't win. You need to stand for something that most people want, like shoring up Social Security. Mitt Romney lost with a similar strategy -- claiming that taxpayers want "free stuff". After all the mud slinging, we are voters not firewalls.
merrily
(45,251 posts)GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)so don't get your hopes up.'
merrily
(45,251 posts)Didn't Bernie made some joke about copyright infringement.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)so some of it is "Bernie-Lite". Her highest scoring ad is the one that seems the most like a Sanders ad:
Sanders says Expand Social Security and Medicare -- Clinton says "how about just daycare?" I guess that is Bernie-extra-Lite.
merrily
(45,251 posts)GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)...
We look at our country and see so much that isn't working the way it should. We see grandparents forced to choose between paying rent and buying medicine because a prescription drug company has increased prices 5,000% overnight. We see African American families denied mortgages are nearly three times the rate of white families.
...
In the campaign, we've heard a lot about Washington and Wall Street. We all want to get secret unaccountable money out of politics. That starts with appointing a new Justice to the Supreme Court.
She slips in the qualifier "secret, unaccountable" in front of money and then says that it won't be starting with her.
Goes on from there:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/02/20/transcript-hillary-clintons-nevada-cacuses-victory-speech/
merrily
(45,251 posts)Here's one--trying to imply she has a lot of small donors. Bernie has had about 4 million donations, averaging under $30 each. She claims 750,000 donors with the vast majority giving under $100 each. Doesn't seem to add up. But, then, she's counting only what comes through hillary.com. Not the PAC and the checks she picks up personally.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Made my morning.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)vi5
(13,305 posts)Then god help us all.
As I just said in another thread, I really wonder if Hillary and her court plan on actually campaigning on any goals or hopes or if their entire platform is just going to consist of shouting "President Trump" or "President Rubio" over and over again?
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)but that's why she is having trouble with Sanders.
The Clintons do best when they are under attack from the Right. It makes them seem center-left. But attacks from the Left have the opposite effect.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Their entire campaign is now two things:
1. She's ahead of Sanders in the polls (true)
2. She can get elected in the ge, Sanders can't (lie)
And a few of them admit that they like corporatist rule, a few that if HRC was an ax murderer they would still vote for her because "we've had enough white men presidents".
Broward
(1,976 posts)Some wittingly, some not.
panader0
(25,816 posts)but I don't really know what they are. I know what she is though. Her negatives are through the roof.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)"I promise to echo Sanders' concerns as long as you all understand that I will not actually do anything about them!"
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)them done.