Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:03 PM Feb 2016

I'm neither naive, nor unrealistic

And on both sides of this Primary equation we have some great supporters and intelligent minds.

It's a fair statement to say that the primaries weren't over before Nevada. It's also a fair statement to say Bernie was not supposed to and not expected to win Nevada.

So why then did this one loss suddenly mean the end of the campaign? Can we agree that no matter which website you get your news from that this is the narrative they are pushing hard? Do you ever ask yourself why that is?

We have the big contests coming up and three weeks until the 3/15 contests. What was Bernie three weeks out of Iowa, NH and Nevada? He improved on all in the remaining time.

Again, I'm not naive. Team Clinton is in the driver's seat. But how about we let these next few weeks play out before talking about people dropping out. 2/27 and 3/1 are going to serve Hillary well. I like our chances in the states beyond that.

Let's let it play out before we bury any candidate.

Just my morning musings. Flame or talk away.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm neither naive, nor unrealistic (Original Post) SheenaR Feb 2016 OP
Yeah Its About to Get Worse-Much Worse for Sanders in your time frame Stallion Feb 2016 #1
Furthermore, no matter who one supports, let's be polite. longship Feb 2016 #2
"Childish tantrum" is your way of "being polite"... . JudyM Feb 2016 #3
Yes, there are many here who exhibit that very thing. longship Feb 2016 #6
I'm a Sanders supporter and I don't think that is okay. Punkingal Feb 2016 #5
Are you always so passive aggressive in your call for politeness? Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #7
I stand by my post. longship Feb 2016 #8
And calling people children helps no one tkmorris Feb 2016 #9
Well, acting like children doesn't either. longship Feb 2016 #10
And you are just the scoldee to do it tkmorris Feb 2016 #12
Well one would not scold if folks would only act like adults. longship Feb 2016 #13
That is the second time you've said "by definition" about this tkmorris Feb 2016 #14
This is not a good place to be for a Bernie voter Cosmocat Feb 2016 #15
Well, I just do not like the idea of a GOP White House. longship Feb 2016 #16
Right Cosmocat Feb 2016 #18
Or just not let the crazies obtain power. longship Feb 2016 #20
I was just mulling a similarly pointed OP. Why the post-mortem for a campaign over performing every morningfog Feb 2016 #4
Going into NV, the odds were against Sanders but it was a real chance to change those odds. geek tragedy Feb 2016 #11
It all goes back to the Telecommunications act of 1996. basselope Feb 2016 #17
It's SO simple demwing Feb 2016 #19

Stallion

(6,476 posts)
1. Yeah Its About to Get Worse-Much Worse for Sanders in your time frame
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:24 PM
Feb 2016

Clinton is going to take Sanders to the woodshed in the next 3 weeks. Most pundits see what is ahead

longship

(40,416 posts)
2. Furthermore, no matter who one supports, let's be polite.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:49 PM
Feb 2016

I support Bernie Sanders in the primary, but it is a badge of honor that I have been banned from the Bernie Sanders group and remain a Hillary Clinton group member, whatever that means other than that I refuse to cut off one arm to promote the other.

Thank you Hillary group. I hope you all consider tactics in the event that Bernie wins the nomination. Unfortunately, many of my fellow Bernie supporters are not thinking about what happens if. Many seem to want to burn down the house if they don't get their way, a childish tantrum. I don't see how that works.

I certainly won't be part of that. I cannot think of anything worse than a GOP presidency in 2017.

Apparently many of my fellow Bernie Sanders supporters think that that is okay. I do not.

And to the Hillary supporters, tone down the rhetoric as well.

longship

(40,416 posts)
6. Yes, there are many here who exhibit that very thing.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:14 PM
Feb 2016

Which I in no way support. One can promote ones candidate without degrading a fellow Democratic candidate.

And the fucking ridiculous "I cannot vote for the Democratic nominee if it isn't my choice" is by definition a childish tantrum. From either the Bernie or Hillary perspective!

I cannot and will not abide by any such argument. If you do support such a thing, you do not belong here. And good luck with that GOP presidency in 2017 if your argument catches hold.

Many of us who support Bernie Sanders will gladly vote for the nominee no matter who it is. The alternative is too horrendous to consider. Only children would see it otherwise.

I stand by my post.

My best to you.

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
5. I'm a Sanders supporter and I don't think that is okay.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:13 PM
Feb 2016

But I think a Hillary nomination ensures it.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
7. Are you always so passive aggressive in your call for politeness?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:16 PM
Feb 2016

I was banned from the Hillary group and not the Sanders group. "Whatever that means."

Tossing in your last sentence doesn't make the rest of your post any less passive aggressive BS.

longship

(40,416 posts)
8. I stand by my post.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:21 PM
Feb 2016

I will support the Democratic nominee. That is what is important here.

I confess to being passive aggressive on this topic. "United we stand; divided we fall."

And the childish tactics here help nobody.

My best to you, my friend.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
9. And calling people children helps no one
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:46 PM
Feb 2016

I too am sometimes taken aback by the vitriol some posters exhibit when lobbying for their preferred candidate. I also think that the hypocrisy some posters show when calling for civility in others while not displaying it themselves is worse. Pseudo-polite taglines do not help in that regard.

longship

(40,416 posts)
10. Well, acting like children doesn't either.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:05 PM
Feb 2016

I prefer to be reasonable, but my patience is being severely tried. I think a scolding is in order. And I am not the only DUer expressing such sentiments, some who are far more prominent than me.

Not to trot out a silly quote but "Divide and conquer!" That is what is happening to us. Those who cannot see that are missing the whole deal.

I stand by posts here. The extent that we do not unite is the extent to which we lose. It is really that simple.

Best regards.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
12. And you are just the scoldee to do it
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:40 PM
Feb 2016

We see a lot of that sort of attitude around here. I am glad you stand by it; the least a poster can do is to own their own words, although a fair few try hard not to. It is difficult to see how you jibe calling posters children while simultaneously bemoaning how we are becoming divided. The answer seems blatantly obvious, and yet you don't recognize it. Such is life at DU I suppose.

Warmest Apathy.

longship

(40,416 posts)
13. Well one would not scold if folks would only act like adults.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:07 PM
Feb 2016

My argument is simple. If one wants to make a difference I would recommend not tearing things apart by stating that they will not vote for the nominee if they don't get their way.

That is, by definition, a two year old's tantrum.

YMMV. So be it.

I will vote for Bernie Sanders in the MI primary, as will many of my friends. Whoever gains the nomination will gain my support and vote in November. The children who disagree, and the rest of the world, may have to equally suffer for their childish tantrums.

I stand by my post.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
14. That is the second time you've said "by definition" about this
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:23 PM
Feb 2016

That term does not mean what you think it means.

Here's the way this works. YOU don't get to decide when it is appropriate to call people names and when it is not, except for yourself. If you call people names, while calling for them to be civil, you are a hypocrite. YM may NOT vary, that is just the way the world works.

Stand wherever you like.

Cosmocat

(14,566 posts)
15. This is not a good place to be for a Bernie voter
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:31 PM
Feb 2016

who has not gone full conservative hill hating derangement syndrome ...

What I read here is verbatim what the rush limbaugh addled twits I have to painfully listen to at the gym spew.

It is NOTHING like 08, BHO people were so much more self confident and positive focused.

longship

(40,416 posts)
16. Well, I just do not like the idea of a GOP White House.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:42 PM
Feb 2016

And I will support any candidate who opposes that. I will start with Bernie. But will support anybody who will be on that side.

With the GOP having a majority in both houses of Congress, the state houses, the governorships, and SCOTUS on the edge, the stakes are just too important.

But idiots here can play their games and not vote for the nominee if they don't get their way, just like two year old pitching a tantrum. Myself, I will look at the bigger picture and acknowledge that in this election it is really, really important that the Democratic Party retains the Oval Office.

Really fucking important!

Cosmocat

(14,566 posts)
18. Right
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:52 PM
Feb 2016

I get it, Hillary is warmed over, and I like Bernie enough to flip to him like I flipped to BHO from Hillary 8 years ago.

Your point aside, I got fed up with republicans piling on her in the fricken 90s, have no tolerance with it from Dems.

But, to your point ...

YEAH ... Whatever "third way" elements she would bring to the table, she would 1,000,000 times better than Trump's crazy ivan shit, Cruz and wft his game game is, or Rubio being the pretty face to complete republican control of this country.

This all or nothing shit is out of hand.

longship

(40,416 posts)
20. Or just not let the crazies obtain power.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:05 PM
Feb 2016

I would gladly support anybody who would prevent that from happening. The alternative to the most odious of Democratic presidential candidates is something so terrible that those opposing said Democrat will be on their knees begging forgiveness if the GOP wins.

That is why I will support the Democratic Party nominee no matter who it is.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
4. I was just mulling a similarly pointed OP. Why the post-mortem for a campaign over performing every
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:11 PM
Feb 2016

poll?

The answer is clear. Bernie is still rising, he was strong in NV after being back 30-40 points. He has brought the national numbers to a tie. He is tied in the delegate count.

Yet, the narrative is that his campaign is over. Because those pushing it want that to be true.

And come his expected loss in SC< no matter the margin, they will scream: SEE I TOLD YOU ITS OVER1!1!1!

It's transparent and disconcerting.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
11. Going into NV, the odds were against Sanders but it was a real chance to change those odds.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:06 PM
Feb 2016

So, it was a missed opportunity. He doesn't have too many of those left.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
17. It all goes back to the Telecommunications act of 1996.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:46 PM
Feb 2016

There are now 6 sources of news because of the consolidation allowed under.. who was President in 1996 again? Oh yeah, Bill Clinton.

You want truth and objectivity in media.. you need to go back in time.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
19. It's SO simple
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:54 PM
Feb 2016

The PTB don't want Bernie's reforms, because those reforms would mean less money in their pockets, and less control in their hands.

Of course they want Bernie to go away, and they will lie and cheat to see that this goal is achieved before the convention.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I'm neither naive, nor un...