Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jkbRN

(850 posts)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:07 PM Feb 2016

Emails show HRC Aides Celebrating F-15 Sales as "Good News"

The planes, made by Boeing, have been implicated in the bombing of three Doctors Without Borders (Médicins Sans Frontieres, or MSF) facilities. The U.N. Secretary General has decried “intense airstrikes in residential areas and on civilian buildings in Sana’a, including the Chamber of Commerce, a wedding hall and a centre for the blind,” and has warned that reports of cluster bombs being used in populated areas “may amount to a war crime due to their indiscriminate nature.”

Bombs dropped by fighter jets are pulverizing Yemen’s architectural history, possibly in violation of international humanitarian law.

A few years earlier, as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton made weapons transfer to the Saudi government a “top priority,” according to her closest military aide.

And now, newly released emails show that her aides kept her well-informed of the approval process for a 2011 sale worth $29.4 billion to Boeing of up to 84 advanced F-15SA fighters, along with upgrades to the Saudi’s pre-existing fleet of 70 F-15 aircraft, and munitions, spare parts, training, maintenance, and logistics.

The deal was finalized on Christmas Eve 2011. Afterwards, Jake Sullivan, then Clinton’s deputy chief of staff and now a senior policy adviser on her presidential campaign, sent her a celebratory e-mail string topped with the chipper message: “FYI – good news.”


Source: https://theintercept.com/2016/02/22/saudi-christmas-present/
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Response to jkbRN (Original post)

Response to VulgarPoet (Reply #2)

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
16. Actually, there was three things.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:51 PM
Feb 2016

The first, being the F35. I'm Air Force, and it's honestly galling that so many of our leaders support a failed swiss-army-knife of a project, especially when the A-10 is easily the best CAS frame we have.

The second is PoC outreach; which admittedly I'm not sure how to solve. While I support the man, at some point, raving and frothing about his civil rights record from 50 years ago gets old; what's he been doing in the meantime.

The third is the nuclear mess he got into in Vermont; but I still need to do more research on that before I come to a hard and fast decision on it.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
3. Did he sell any of them to foreign countries so they could bomb the hell out of people?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:18 PM
Feb 2016

That's right. The answer is no.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
5. Better yet...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:21 PM
Feb 2016

He didn't reward any of these unsavory characters with arms for donating to his foundation, either.

Response to notadmblnd (Reply #3)

Response to notadmblnd (Reply #3)

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
13. From reading this article Sanders did us a favor by voting for it.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:44 PM
Feb 2016

If they don't fly, it can't be sold to a foreign country and used to bomb the hell out of people.

Response to notadmblnd (Reply #13)

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
15. Well, are you tired of your tax payer $$s going for worthless defense equipment yet?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:50 PM
Feb 2016

Just think what that money could do for our infrastructure and the jobs rebuilding that infrastructure would provide.

I guess it's better to enrich the military industrial complex than to make this country and it's people truly great.

Response to notadmblnd (Reply #15)

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
18. Lockheed Martin in Vermont: Senator Bernie Sanders’ Corporate Conundrum
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:09 PM
Feb 2016
By 2011, Sanders was also supporting the Pentagon’s proposal to base Lockheed-built F-35 fight jets at the Burlington International Airport. Despite his past criticisms of the corporation’s serial misconduct and excess, he joined with Vermont’s most enthusiastic booster, Senator Patrick Leahy, signing on to a joint statement of support. If the fighter jet, widely considered a massive military boondoggle, was going to be built and deployed anyway, Sanders argued that some of the work ought to done by Vermonters, while Vermont National Guard jobs should certainly be protected. Noise impacts and neighborhood dislocation were minimized, while criticism of corporate exploitation had given way to pork barrel politics and a justification based on protecting military jobs.

Still, his position hadn’t changed that much. Sandia’s nuclear associations were never a major obstacle; Sanders had once been pro-nuclear power, and his criticisms were restrained. His stalwart alliance with labor had always outweighed his skepticism about military spending. And his corporate criticism, which focused on fairness and inequality, rarely prevented him from making an alliance that furthered “bold” initiatives or burnished his record of leadership.


http://www.globalresearch.ca/lockheed-martin-in-vermont-senator-bernie-sanders-corporate-conundrum/5452106

hack89

(39,171 posts)
12. The F-35 is a multi-national program that includes Israel and Turkey
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:41 PM
Feb 2016

what are the odds that those planes will be used to "bomb the hell out of people"?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
8. How many F-35s did he sell to Saudi Arabia?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:32 PM
Feb 2016

Zero.

How many F-35s are bombing MSF hospitals in Yemen?

Zero.

Hrm...wonder if there's a difference.....

Response to jeff47 (Reply #8)

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
9. Do you know what being a SOS entails?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:38 PM
Feb 2016

Part of the job is to promote American businesses abroad. If Boeing hadn't sold them these planes someone else would have and a U.S. company would have lost the deal.

A SOS implements the policies of the president. Take it up with him.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Emails show HRC Aides Cel...