Of course that can change, no one is disputing that, but as it stands now, Clinton is way ahead. Not everything is a lie just because it's subject to interpretation.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Birds are territorial creatures.
The lyrics to the songbird's melodious trill go something like this:
"Stay out of my territory or I'll PECK YOUR GODDAMNED EYES OUT!"[/center][/font][hr]

he is obfuscating endorsements with delegstes, and i do believe it is intentional.

It's one thing to yearn for a different outcome than the current data suggests, or even pine for a more favorable possibility, but when the circumstances fails to match your objective expectations, that does not translate into a "lie". Until the numbers actually support your assertions, we are left with nothing to mull over beyond your own untenable assumptions.

Nothing is gained by omitting the rest of the data, or by pushing the unsupported assumption those numbers will have any monumental shift, especially not at this early stage of the process.

so pushing the idea that one is ahead of the other is disengenuous and inaccurate.

Best of luck with the new math, though.

But it's not honest to assert they shouldn't be considered, either.

that right now, they are basically endorsements. if hillary wants to shout it out that so and so endorsed her, i have no problem with that. but the supers have a history of supporting the people's decision, and this year for some reason, the msm "forgets" to mention that. if we are lucky, they might mention that they can change their mind, but many don't mention that important tidbit.

i have no problem with discussing the supers. i DO have a problem with the msm pushing the falsehood that they are locked up votes and that she will win no matter what because of them.

If you count the super delegates, she's had that lead since before the first caucus.
If you don't count the super delegates, then they're tied.

So *if* that's exactly what he said, then either way, it's a lie.

is it possible he said "hillary HAS opened up a huge lead......" its possible, but of course that would be a lie, too.

which most "everyday americans"couldn't give a hoot about. they want to know their vote will matter.

when clinton supporters say fox wants bernie to win.

That isn't saying much considering the company he keeps.

He has always had his orders and he follows them well.

2044 Armacost Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90025
Fox News, Address

very thoughtful addition to the thread. NOT sarcasm


i did not know it was an LA address, interesting