2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAs Bernie Gains On Clinton, New Poll Suggests Voters Open To Socialism
Democrats Ready For Socialism? With Bernie Sanders Gaining On Clinton, New Poll Suggests Voters Open To ItBY CLARK MINDOCK @CLARKMINDOCK ON 02/22/16
http://www.ibtimes.com/democrats-ready-socialism-bernie-sanders-gaining-clinton-new-poll-suggests-voters-2317267
A new poll may answer the question that has been on the minds of many pundits since Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders announced his run for the president: Can a self-described socialist really rally enough support to win a United States election?
...Roughly six in 10 Democratic voters say they have favorable views toward socialism, according to the poll, which was conducted by a right-leaning issue advocacy group. The sentiment was shared among Democratic voters regardless of age, gender and race, Politico reports.
American Action Network reportedly took precautions to ensure that the poll wasnt only reflective of the 2016 Democratic primary race, however. Neither Sanders nor former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were mentioned by name when the surveys were conducted. Instead, the group, which is funded by a super PAC that supports House Republicans, asked questions based upon a television interview with Democratic Party chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz in which she was pressed to define the difference between a Democrat and a socialist.
(snip)
Clinton has long held a healthy lead over Sanders in national polls but Sanders has recently been catching up fast. She leads him by just 5.6 percent of the average, 47.6 percent to 52 percent. (And many polls show they are "virtually tied -- NB).
dburner3
(8 posts)Give ME A BREAK.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)People actually like social democracy, even if they don't realize that's what it's called.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)ended by a few more state losses
after a few more ugly incidents and crude appeals to humanity's baser side, after more disgusting revelations, after the FBI indictment, after her sense of inevitability is broken, people are gonna start asking why Sanders is supposedly "behind" in all the states when the trendlines have already crossed nationwide
Yuugal
(2,281 posts)Her appeal is just becoming more selective.....
MisterP
(23,730 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)The problem is, it's overwhelmingly the other way for independents, non party id folks and of course even worse for Republicans.
brooklynite
(94,595 posts)...and since the Primary is State by State, rather than a national vote...
...tell us which States Sanders will win that will get us the delegates he needs?
Roy Ellefson
(279 posts)he has a shot at all the blue states...he can win Mass, CT, WI, MN, NY, Cal etc. etc. the nominee should and can't be decided by states that will never vote for the Democrat...he's still in it.
brooklynite
(94,595 posts)...and CA is too large and too non-white for his campaign model.
And I note you left out huge battleground States like PA, OH, MI, FL, VA.....
WillyT
(72,631 posts)kstewart33
(6,551 posts)The article doesn't provide that.
Paka
(2,760 posts)GO BERNIE!
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)yea
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)anti-trade and generally anti-Democratic sentiments including blistering criticism of Barack and (usually by innuendo) Hillary. Add to that the fact that for all intents and purposes there's nothing particularlarly s/Socialist about him. He's basically an old-school New England Republican which today sorts out to Independent (his actual status) and L/libertarian. In 24 years I've never heard him actually talk about European or US socialism in any informed way..