Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:38 PM Feb 2016

So Warren won't make an endorsement before the convention and Hillary supporters cheer...

But what did Elizabeth Warren say?

"A new presidential election is upon us... Anyone who shrugs and claims that change is just too hard has crawled into bed with the billionaires who want to run this country like some private club." -- Elizabeth Warren

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/liam-miller/elizabeth-warren-sinks-clintons-hopes_b_9058526.html

And why do you suppose she won't endorse now?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511245564

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ebayfool

(3,411 posts)
1. That had to sting!
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:43 PM
Feb 2016

snip/

Warren is eloquent, moving, and on topic as always. Right at the end, however, she changes gears. I almost missed it; what she had said up to that point was so compelling that my mind was ringing. It was only on the second listen that I caught them: three sentences that leapt from the specific (campaign finance reform) to the general (Progressivism itself):

A new presidential election is upon us. The first votes will be cast in Iowa in just eleven days. Anyone who shrugs and claims that change is just too hard has crawled into bed with the billionaires who want to run this country like some private club.

It would be hard to overstate the controlled vehemence and contempt with which Warren delivers her last statement, just as there is no question who that "anyone" refers to. Clinton, unable to win over Progressives (both MoveOn.org and Democracy for America have endorsed Sanders), has attempted to reel in moderates by casting herself as the more pragmatic choice, and has painted Sanders with the broad brush of unrealistic idealism. Warren's message, so aligned with Sanders's as it has always been, is covered by those same strokes. Never one to shrink from a challenge, Warren comes out swinging.

Her riposte could not be more direct, as she reminds us of what true Progressives sound like and stand up for: broadly popular ideas, which are still somehow considered politically impractical. At the same time, she reminds us that 'politically impractical' is just code for 'wealthy donors don't like it.' The money Clinton has received from Wall Street, so much a topic of last Sunday's debate, illustrates Warren's indictment all too well.
 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
2. Warren doesn't have to: we know where she stands. Well some of us do.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:49 PM
Feb 2016

Fans of Warren have followed her for quite sometime. DU'ers have seen the clips (Bill Moyers) etc. If Hillary gets (notice I said gets, not wins) Warren will endorse her, with fingers crossed behind her back.

thesquanderer

(11,989 posts)
16. as far as I can tell, there is no such news there.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:59 PM
Feb 2016

Only DUer seaotter's opinion that "she will wait until the people have made their decision." There is nothing to that effect in the linked article.

BreakfastClub

(765 posts)
4. I think it will be a very painful day for Bernie supporters when Warren endorses
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:50 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary. A very painful day indeed...

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
9. It won't happen unless she gets the nomination
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:54 PM
Feb 2016

And that will indeed be a painful day for liberals and progressives

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
8. I'm not cheering that she isn't endorsing.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:53 PM
Feb 2016

I simply see it as being in her best interest. Pretty simple.

Renew Deal

(81,861 posts)
11. Sanders desperately needs the endorsement. Hillary doesn't need it at all.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:55 PM
Feb 2016

So no endorsement is just as much of a win for Hillary as a Warren endorsement.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
17. It's a little premature to expect an endorsement
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:30 PM
Feb 2016

This who have endorsed are clearly behind their candidate. Warren has her reasons for waiting. I'm not happy or sad, she apparently is waiting. I don't see the big deal. Lots of people haven't endorsed yet.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»So Warren won't make an e...