Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumUpdate: Quid pro Quo: State Dept. Investigators--Subpoenas to Clintons
Last edited Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:46 PM - Edit history (1)
The State Dept is investigating some of Hillary's quid pro quo:Clinton Foundation received subpoena from State Department investigators
Investigators with the State Department issued a subpoena to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation last fall seeking documents about the charitys projects that may have required approval from the federal government during Hillary Clintons term as secretary of state, according to people familiar with the subpoena and written correspondence about it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-foundation-received-subpoena-from-state-department-investigators/2016/02/11/ca5125b2-cce4-11e5-88ff-e2d1b4289c2f_story.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 943 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (22)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Update: Quid pro Quo: State Dept. Investigators--Subpoenas to Clintons (Original Post)
amborin
Feb 2016
OP
I don't think so. There are many known facts that can be used to inform the public.
Skwmom
Feb 2016
#7
Sorry, but who would trust anything from the State Dept? Unless they are a true independent
Skwmom
Feb 2016
#6
grasswire
(50,130 posts)1. too flawed to represent the Democratic Party.
Can't Democrats see that???
kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)2. interesting....
Matariki
(18,775 posts)3. No wonder she so desperately wants to be President
she's gonna need to pardon herself and her whole family.
amborin
(16,631 posts)4. wondering about the status of this investigation
Bernie or a surrogate should bring this issue to the public's attention
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)7. I don't think so. There are many known facts that can be used to inform the public.
This could be a trap (especially since it involves the State Dept.).
amborin
(16,631 posts)5. more here:
In 2011, the State Department cleared an enormous arms deal: Led by Boeing, a consortium of American defense contractors would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to Saudi Arabia, despite concerns over the kingdom's troublesome human rights record. In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, Saudi Arabia had contributed $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, and just two months before the jet deal was finalized, Boeing donated $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to an International Business Times investigation released Tuesday.
The Saudi transaction is just one example of nations and companies that had donated to the Clinton Foundation seeing an increase in arms deals while Hillary Clinton oversaw the State Department.
IBT found that between October 2010 and September 2012, State approved $165 billion in commercial arms sales to 20 nations that had donated to the foundation, plus another $151 billion worth of Pentagon-brokered arms deals to 16 of those countriesa 143 percent increase over the same time frame under the Bush Administration.
The sales boosted the military power of authoritarian regimes such as Qatar, Algeria, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, and Oman, which, like Saudi Arabia, had been criticized by the department for human rights abuses......
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/05/hillary-clinton-foundation-state-arms-deals
The Saudi transaction is just one example of nations and companies that had donated to the Clinton Foundation seeing an increase in arms deals while Hillary Clinton oversaw the State Department.
IBT found that between October 2010 and September 2012, State approved $165 billion in commercial arms sales to 20 nations that had donated to the foundation, plus another $151 billion worth of Pentagon-brokered arms deals to 16 of those countriesa 143 percent increase over the same time frame under the Bush Administration.
The sales boosted the military power of authoritarian regimes such as Qatar, Algeria, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, and Oman, which, like Saudi Arabia, had been criticized by the department for human rights abuses......
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/05/hillary-clinton-foundation-state-arms-deals
eta: Saudi Arabia (Sunni/Wahhabi) is using some of those fighter jets to bomb Houthis (Shiites) in Yemen, with massive civilian casualties; YET---the Houthis have been constantly FIGHTING AGAINST AL QUEDA in Yemen!
more here:
David Sirota and Andrew Perez have previously reported for the International Business Times that Clintons State Department was heavily involved in approving weapons sales to Saudi Arabia. As weapons transfers were being approved, both the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Boeing made donations to the Clinton Foundation. The Washington Post revealed that a Boeing lobbyist helped with fundraising in the early stages of Hillary Clintons current presidential campaign.
https://theintercept.com/2016/02/22/saudi-christmas-present/
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)6. Sorry, but who would trust anything from the State Dept? Unless they are a true independent
body made up of individuals that can not be coerced, I think it's more likely part of an orchestrated whitewash.
dsc
(52,166 posts)8. so Obama is just a corrupt pol
and Kerry too. why are you hear again?
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)9. If it's not truly an independent investigation it's a waste of time except for political stagecraft.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)10. Oh that really proves something.