Nevada is his State.

He's got a lot of nerve, eh?

that's the problem.

maybe he becomes a Democrat before April 2015...?

to Hillary supporters. She's a real Democrat.

This talking point is weak as hell.

Allowing the casino workers to get off to vote is great though.

Union Strong Arm tactics etc in an engineered chaos environment. yep Hillary won but not without considerable lapses in the rules... as it were by her compatriots! Yeah, harry is a great guy...

Can you be anymore patronizing?

Why don't you show up to a union meeting sometime talking that kind of shit? See what kind of reaction you get.

That so many hear see conspiracies all over the place. As has already been mentioned, making sure employers let their workers off to vote is really a pretty good thing if you ask me.

And yet they still accept their "win" . What a bunch of losers. We need to get dirty and fast. So much dirt out there. Wouldn't be surprised if someone was or is having affairs still. I hate liars and cheaters.

A jury apparently left this 3-4.

Damn you Harry Reid!

Oh yeah, they were the ones doing it. I don't blame Harry for doing what he did other than going against his word but don't act like he was doing it for a fellow Dem. He did it for Clinton.

J'ACCUSE!

n/t

...it can't be because you were out-organized and out-voted, you have to resort to this epic pout. It just adds to your delusion that there's something supremely ordained about your candidate's campaign.

Bad sports.

Lost?
Pout?
Delusion?
Ordained?
Bad sports?

YOU FOLKS?????

...when confronted with your sour grapes.

It's not working.

He gave more people a chance to join the caucus. How is that undemocratic or rigged? Republicans are known for blocking voters. Dems try to get more voters. That's what Harry did.

Do you not understand how voting works?

"Instructed" to vote... No SECRET Ballot... Everybody got to see what you did... Get Outa line you just might lose your job... ya think?

Union bosses making sure the members didn't step out of line. But overall that was just a small portion of the vote rigging. The whole operation was much more fraudulant than the Iowa caucus.

accomplished! Instead he saves it to use on the Party.

told them how they had to vote?

Have you ever been to Nevada?

Washoe Co. 1035 Bernie to 875 Hillary.

70% of Nevadans live in Vegas though, and they usually call the shots for the whole state.

Hey Harry give Area 51 a call!

"Do you think Harry told them how they had to vote?"


Really? You wanna go with that? Did I say that? No, I didn't.

But you go right on asking simple, silly questions with your bad self.

Way To Go Harry!!!

He's an expert at shady deals.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wall Street or the Strip, Just Us.

couldn't you come up with anything but just so much nonsense....Democrats should stick together unlike those on DU.

Democrats should stick together, and real ones do here on DU. Sadly there are some here who are not real Democrats, they only come here to complain, and in some cases to disrupt the boards and divide posters.

For the life of me I can's understand why so many here are going for the "scorched earth" scenario here on DU when it comes to the "other" candidate.

Hillary was a Senator when he was the Senate Leader. I completely support Bernie, but I'm not so naïve that I would expect tge establishment to support each other. Get real!

A lot of the people who "claim" to be part of the revolution are not really Democrats. I could be wrong though, but I don't think so.

I have been a member of this party for a long time, but what does it mean anymore when we take from the same coffers the republicans do? What does it mean when the presumed front runner supported trade deals that are bad for workers? What does it mean when a candidate start negotiating for higher wages nationwide at the point in which things would improve but not get anything more? That is bad judgment, It's not being realistic because if that were the case a realistic negotiator wouldn't lead in with the bottom dollar amount. What does it mean to be a democrat of this standard? I'm sure you all have similar beliefs but why the disconnect? Democrats need to differentiate themselves from republicans, but they rarely do on economic issues. Selling out to the business class and management while already throwing in the towel is a fight I don't think any of us truly want. I do not want to fight to start negotiating at $12 and hour, I consider that fighting from a position of weakness. I do not want to fight in hopes a candidate doesn't return to their original view of TPP after they win. Or keystone. Or private prison lobbies. I did not like being called a tea party member. I am not a person who started a PUMA movement in 2008. I am not a person who has forgot at one time one income was enough to feed your family. If you want to vote for whatever table scraps big business throws us that is your choice, but do not expect me to join ranks of that mission. I will cast votes of approval for democrats in November, but I do not want to start the damn fight with wet powder. Hillary is wet powder. She sets our principles at such a low achievable goal that it is really just lip service. That is the problem.

It is actually the Clinton campaign that opposes solidarity. Was it a move towards solidarity when Bill Clinton called a voting block as large as the Sanders supporters "the tea party of the left"? Was it solidarity when Madeline Albright tried to condemn women to hell? I am going to speak for myself and myself only, but if you do not want the support of Bernie Sanders supporters please just say so. I will gladly step away from the process instead of allowing you to continually insult me. I find a candidate suspicious at best that has been on both sides of nearly every issue. I find a candidate suspicious when they berate republicans for "being in the tank" for taking money from large corporations, wall st. , big pharma, private prisons etc . and suddenly they are miraculously changed. I find it suspicious that you can be for NAFTA, TPP, keystone, private prison lobbies but immediately make a switch as needed. You may think I am stupid, which is fine, but to sit here and say Hillary isn't "in the bag" just like republicans for taking the exact same money is well, naive. If you want to only win the game then continue this strategy of insulting a growing voting block, if you want to win the season, well to be honest I think you already lost that ability. I will canvass, call, and donate to Bernie, if he is not nominated, I will only vote. It will be for democrats. More than likely though, only the ones who haven't used surrogates to insult me. Only the ones who haven't spread lies to tarnish both the character of a long time ally, and the supporters of Bernie Sanders. I am just hoping you haven't already earned your loss in the general, if you can even win the democratic nomination. I will fight for Bernie until then. I am sure he will endorse your favorite. We are a rebellious lot though. Good Luck winning new voters with that exceptionally brilliant strategy.

More effective at hampering the liberal wing of their party than at actual repugs. And you wonder why the party's not uniting.

Polling data the day before the caucus had Bernie winning by 2%, which is why I thought the results are gonna be similar to IW; 7% gap from that data was suspicious.

On Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:44 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Harry Reid Rushed Home to Nevada to Help Rig Caucus Results for Clinton
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511313409

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This piece is full of lies and no wonder. The Observer was purchased a couple years ago by Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law. The CEO is Kushner's brother-in-law, Joseph Meyer, and the Editor is Ken Kurson, a Rudy Giuliania associate. It is not the liberal paper it used to be. Just a Donald Trump mouthpiece.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:48 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

I hate this post! I hate what it insinuates! know, I'll hit the Alert button.

Good Gawd people!

Just like any of us regular Hillary supporters are mindless zombies, corporatists, third wayers etc. how about holding Bernies campaign accountable? Hillary is running a better smarter campaign so far.