Still, he'd spend a heck of a lot less on it.

We would spend a lot less money and people on foreign affairs. That is a better policy already.

that's strong on foreign policy. American's are so disconnected from reality that that is impossible.

Recommended

Like I care what he thinks. What an ego. He can STFU.

So you'll accept David Brock's punditry but ignore someone who has seen firsthand what Clinton is capable of because "ego". You probably wholeheartedly believe Snowden was a traitor, too.

SMDH.

I know I sure don't. Fuck Assange.

How has Julian seen first hand anything? No the left does not monolithically accept the actions of Julian and Eddie. They keep trying to make themselves relevant rather than facing the charges against them.

He has been privy to so much of the foreign policy fuckups and coverups.

I'm not going to take advice from him. If he wants to talk about other people's weaknesses, he needs to take responsibility for his own and go stand trial for the multiple rapes he's committed.

...the presumption of innocence shifts a bit.

It was a charge made up by the police at the behest of the US so the US could get him where they could capture or assasinate him.

But it's not surprising to see Team Hillary spreading the lie. That's what Hillary does best.

at least one of his victims would appear to disagree with you.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/julian-assange-rape-victim-criticises-un-decision-over-detention-a6857796.html

The corporatocracy will stop at nothing to silence -- or murder -- assange.

that is why I believe her. Is that really an unreasonable standard?

say he's 'weak on foreign policy', they mean 100% the opposite of what people who don't support him mean.

We mean he's too prone still to the temptation of supporting foreign adventurism, while they feel he's too much a dove.

Good observation.

Which is why we've got to nominate Bernie.

Because if it comes down to 'disastrous vs disastrous', there's no winning with either.

Who do you suppose Bernie will support?

But I don't vote based on 'endorsements' and I support policy, not personality. Bernie has the policy, Hillary doesn't.

It's always gratifying (and somewhat validating) when someone you admire supports your candidate. But I would never, ever support a candidate based on a recommendation or -- even worse -- a skillfully crafted, heartstrings-tugging political ad. I prefer to look at the facts and think for myself. That's what my brain is for.

Trump would be a disaster for our planet.

by reading the exact same information Bernie did and yet decided to vote with Bush/Cheney to attack Iraq! How can she sleep at night knowing her bad decision cost so many American lives, as a veteran myself, I find that unforgivable. And the enormous cost in dollars is mind-boggling. Some people have said, "Well, she apologized for that mistake" really? How many opportunities will Clinton have as a president to make more mistakes, do you want to chance it, do you? Besides being a veteran I'm also a mother and grandmother and I want to feel I've made the best choice for this honorable position of Madam President and it's not Hillary Clinton. There are so many other women worth considering, let's not be in a rush.

And the cornerstone of neoconservatism is empire.

Compared to Hillary on foreign policy, Bernie would be a much saner leader.

Why would anyone give a damn what Assange thinks about the US election?