I'm told I should be going for a purchased third way conservative neoliberal because she has similar body parts as me.

That makes zero sense.

Just kiddin' ya'
I am told because I am not white I too was supposed to be going for the moderate Republican, or as the kids say "third Way"

I guess we live to surprise, or maybe being multiracial, my Korean, Black, and Latino parts were wrestled to the ground by my outnumbered white part in a display of internal white supremacy LOL.

Dragonfli, I'm glad the whole of you is here in your multiracial, sharp, liberal, leftie glorious self.

Just ask Killer Mike.

Last edited Tue Feb 23, 2016, 01:35 PM - Edit history (1)

or rather the lack of non-white males in it.

Edited to reflect a comment in the 0-7 failed attempt to hide:

I'm busted. But I'll post it anyways, because I honestly think Bernie is in all of our best interests.

You literally posted it after the call-out.

You might want to find a better picture to prove your point. Look at the faces, I see maybe five POC in a sea of White faces. That is other than Mr. Jealous and Mr. Glover.

Present company included.

Spot on.

Like his SC rally the other day.

SMH....they just don't get it.

Last edited Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:59 PM - Edit history (1)

It's been obvious from day one this is how you like it and want to keep it. Why waste so much time flogging the issue?

Do you deny it? Your posting history shows a clear pattern. You feign concern, but offer no solutions. Most of your posts are obsessive affirmations of Sanders' inability (unworthiness) to capture the AA vote. It's your thing.

have offered as a solution ... because there is nothing in it for you in disconnecting racial/social justice from economic justice.

So, Yes ... I deny it ... check my post history. I have never (rarely) posted "affirmations of Sanders' inability (unworthiness) to capture the AA vote", without stating WHY he stumbles among the Black electorate.

To be sure ... not wanting to hear/accept an answer is not the same thing as having no answer provided.

"deleterious coupling of social and economic justice"? The campaign meme ready to roll the day Sanders announced? I forget, remind me again what your solutions were. I know Bernie has stated repeatedly that fighting racism can not be accomplished only on the economic front. I know he has proposed addressing the systemic issues in the justice system, including the Clinton's industrial prison matrix. I know he has repeatedly reached out to the community... yet... Please remind me of your specific suggested fix. I'm all ears.

But I have no doubt you will want to claim otherwise ... which will, AGAIN, prove my point, that answers have been given; but, you just don't want to hear them.

Last edited Tue Feb 23, 2016, 04:51 PM - Edit history (1)

I must have missed them. Put up or prove my point.

If you wish to feign ignorance and pretend that you have never seen the months of posts that drove Bravenak out of Camp Bernie, or my economic primacy critiques of the Bernie campaign ... that is completely on you.

just a lot of complaining, shifting rationales, and moving goal posts. Mostly vague stuff like "he's just not connecting" and "he better figure it out"... without explaining why or how. Lots of "whatever it is it must be true because polls". Little actually offered other than simplistic and lazy blanket statements like "Bernie's too much about economics". You have an easy opportunity right now to not only shut me up, but garner an apology. Post a link that proves you are more about substance than noise.

as you have demonstrated here.

you got nothin.

And umm... can anybody get in on that action?

All it takes is being home from work with a bad cold ... and a couple brandy laced hot toddies!

I'm posting the jury results from your alerted post:

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Tue Feb 23, 2016, 09:05 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

It just looks like it because of all the white males in it ...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1317343

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

lie.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Feb 23, 2016, 09:13 AM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Unbelievable. This has got to STOP.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It IS incorrect, and an honest assessment would be: "lack of a strong Black presence". Argue that point and if he is an intellectually honenst SBM, then he'll surely fix it. In any case, it's not rude etc. but it is disappointing as he was a lawyer.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerting a post because someone disagrees with an opinion is NOT grounds for a hide.

Leave It Alone
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I really dislike the race card campaign that Clinton's surrogates and supporters have engaged in for months, but I support freedom of speech. I vote to leave this alone as a result.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Thin skin
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alert stalking 1SBM, pure and simple. The alerter should be ashamed.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

At least this person was shut down for 24 hours.

who voted to leave it even though they, too, hate Hillary's racist, sexist campaign.

Oh, honestly.

That claim's not quite an indictment of the whole party.

Living in gated communities, applies even more truthfully, yet tho truer, is also a false stereotype of the Hilary movement.

Words that will result in less incredibly uninformed and embarrassing posts like the one I'm responding to right now.

So there is that.

To be sure, but reading the whole thing would ruin a perfectly good misrepresentation/lie about my post, such honorable tactics you guys use, tell me, are they David Brock copywrited tactics or can any hack sling obvious crap like that?

Seems to be the tactic so often used around here now.

The Campaign sets the tone and the tactics used and both are mirrored by the supporters and financial donor/honorary campaign members. You may not believe this but really, it was not personal, I was talking about David Brock's tactics that of course you will use just like any other support material the campaign provides it's supporters as supporters will.

I get it and I don't take it personal that it was used against me, but the guy is slime IMO and a merchant of slime AIMO, but unless you personally hired him we got no beef.

And then I got personally insulted when I pointed it out, what else is new?

I cut and pasted from you ... leaving out the "But Hillary ..." deflection that is irrelevant to what Bernie's movement is about.

Oh ... Never mind ... I suspect your response will be equally incoherent.

... n-word-izzed associated with Sanders campaing

as entrance and exit polls and photos and video of his supporters at the NV caucus show.

The largest racial group of his supporters, just like Clinton's, are majority white, as is the largest racial group in our country at this point.

Sanders does seem to consistently capture the white male vote, and specifically the young white male vote. This phenomenon is largely due to AGE--his overwhelming support by the youth vote, just like Obama's was in the 2008 GE:

Not any more than any other campaign

It looked towards Warren but she said no. Bernie took up the mantle.

Just askin

Who is next, the Osmonds or Michael J. Fox? (Sorry, couldn't resist.)

I'll bet you do it all the time in real life.

to divide people. To LIE about Bernie Sanders who doesn't have a racist bone in his body.

But Hill -- we know she's racist.

but enjoy your self-righteous rant.

Can't hide behind that O'M anymore; you're out in the open, baby!

We see you.

However, the hyperbolic nonsense from some who claim* to be his supporters is quite funny. It entertains me.

* = Not talking about you here, btw


Sorry, your search didn't turn up anything.

Here's one you should read:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1273691

Hi Bobbie.

How do you think Bernie is going to do there?

And actually the entire Clinton campaign seems rather fixated on which group people belong to (or are assigned to by them).

I'm getting more and more concerned about this divide and conquer strategy of the Hillary campaign.

It is terribly destructive and most illiberal.

It's dirty, it's low, and it's Hillary's M.O.

...tia

I don't fit the demographic narrative, but here I am.

Sid

And I say this as a female with female friends who see through Hillary and much prefer Bernie.

I voted for a woman for president in 2012. But it was based on her policies not her gender.