2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHonest question for Bernie supporters.
How did Bernie earn a living in his early years, say between the ages of 19-40?
I want know his work ethics. Americans are known as hard working people. I want to know how Bernie identifies with the WORKING poor.
Response to fun n serious (Original post)
Post removed
arcane1
(38,613 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)Proud?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)That's some deep thinkin' there!
bunnies
(15,859 posts)was too obvious.
merrily
(45,251 posts)In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)pacalo
(24,721 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)And anyone who has actually bothered to read it, knows that.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)because I would completely give you a heart.
cali
(114,904 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Funny how we are demanded to provide word-for-word evidence, while they can pull anything from their ass and never answer for it.
cali
(114,904 posts)ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Dunno why, but I do.
azmom
(5,208 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)He worked some as a carpenter, although he was a shitty carpenter, Bloch told me. His carpentry, Morrisseau said, was not going to support him, and didnt.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/07/bernie-sanders-vermont-119927_Page2.html#ixzz411sztvsS
MADem
(135,425 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)That's how it goes, eh. I'm sure he enjoyed it though and imagine he's used his skills throughout his life.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I think he wasn't in the mood to work during that youthful time. I think when he found out that he could "make his own hours" and get a paycheck every week, that appealed to him and that's why he stayed in government service.
He's not the first politician who found that "work" attractive. We don't have so many incumbents in Congress because the job sucks and the hours are brutal.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)I sure do.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Acquiring money is important to the Clintons who have moved from broke in 2000 to having between 100,000,000 and 200,000,000 dollars, putting them in the top 1% of the top 1%. And apparently people envy that and assume we all envy that.
As the rich get richer, we get more and more poverty as collateral damage. How do anyone rationalize supporting the wealthy?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Get out of Congress, get a couple of cushy "public policy consulting" jobs with big corps, make some speeches. He couldn't get $250,000 but even if he could only fetch $5,000 per speech, heck not bad for a night's work
NowSam
(1,252 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)But who the fuck cares.
I am a great musician.
polly7
(20,582 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)up a mountain...
Story goes the thing fell apart after making it just 12 yards LOL
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)(I never thought about it before, but... why exactly did Jesus get out of the carpentry biz? Maybe he was shitty at it too.... Not that Jesus' CV is relevant to anything being discussed here, but it just made me wonder.)
I think Bernie's being a shitty carpenter is kind of funny, actually.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)I know there's the whole running the country stuff to deal with, but I would be pretty pissed off if Bernie moved into the White House and didn't keep up with basic home maintenance.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)snip
Following his resignation from Liberty Union, Sanders worked as a writer and the director of the nonprofit American People's Historical Society (APHS).[47] While with the APHS, he made a 30-minute documentary about American Socialist leader and presidential candidate Eugene V. Debs.[29][48]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders
polly7
(20,582 posts)Good for him .... he probably learned a lot about real, everyday people in each of those jobs. It's good to see he didn't spend all those years in a bubble, like some others.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)The articles I've read point out that Bernie never made much money in any of his occupational pursuits. Now the reason he didn't make much money (they just didn't pay much, because he didn't work hard at them, or because he just wasn't real good at what he was doing) was not addressed in the articles.
polly7
(20,582 posts)I can totally see why anyone would have many jobs - some pay well, some don't. Money isn't everything. He's sure fighting hard for those who have to go without now though, isn't he??? So what's your problem?
cali
(114,904 posts)At least he wasn't union busting like hilly.
TM99
(8,352 posts)you based on the size of your wallet.
So Cajun, how much money did you make in your 20's? Enlighten us.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 23, 2016, 07:41 PM - Edit history (1)
TM99
(8,352 posts)The military with its free healthcare, free education, reduced prices on base, etc. Yeah, that was my experience as well.
more free stuff
TM99
(8,352 posts)I want everyone to have it. I wonder why so many others don't?
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)My first check including all of my allowances was about $400 and I was making about $13,500 a year as a captain when I got out. Given that I was working anywhere from 60 to 75 hours a week, I think I earned my pay and my benifits. And I was damn good at what I did.
TM99
(8,352 posts)are receive socialized medicine.
Why don't you want others to have the same? They will be working hard, paying taxes, the same as any of us.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)I know that he can't make it happen, period. Why do I KNOW that? Because I live in the real world were the Republicans will control the House for at least the next 7 years and probably longer.
Second, if we are going to get any relief in that area, I would put my bets on Hillary Clinton, not Bernie Sanders. At least she has shown she can get things done.
Third, I am through with discussion - we will just have to agree to disagree.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)You sound just like me when it comes to Sanders.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Living off the gov teat, eh...
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)what were you doing in your 20's...playing in a band?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Orchestras do.
But you of course wouldn't have a clue about that.
Somebody has to try to keep the world sane.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)I do know that and orchestra is big band and orchestras are not confined to playing Beethoven and Mahler, and they are not confined to playing just classical music for that matter.
Members of both bands and orchestras are musicians are they not? Who is to say which musicians have more talent?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)"..and orchestra is big band and orchestras are not confined to playing Beethoven and Mahler,..." ?
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)... I like classical music, I have heard several well known orchestras give pop concerts. I can recall one concert that was all Beatles tunes.
What really bothers me, is that you give the impression that just because you play or played in a orchestra, that you automatically think that you are a better musician than those musicians in who play in well known bands, and you should know that isn't necessarily the case.
Bangbangdem
(140 posts)The amount of training and practice that comes with achieving status in a symphony is quite an acheivement. It usually starts as a young child and the education required usually is a master's degree to play for a symphony. Along the way you have to engage in competitions that put you up against other musicians playing the same instrument and the same exact materials. You form a record of your progress and all of these things add up to the resume that gets you the shot then to compete for a spot with a symphony. Then once there you move on to get into better symphonies in bigger towns. Musicians like these are likened to doctors for the amount of work, skill and training the have to engage in. All the while they make less than most professionals that must put this sort of work onto their craft. They make about 70-80000 bucks a year. I trained this way from the time I was six, and, brother, when I looked around and started interviewing for college? I quit and joined a band. Hahaha. Not trying to be snarky. This is just what I know about it as a neutral observer. Cheers, Captain.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)So you took all that talent to a band. Just kidding. Cheers.
See, though we support different candidates doesn't mean we can't have a civil conversation.
Bangbangdem
(140 posts)The world just wasn't ready for us. Hahaha!
Funniest shit I've seen all day! Amazing!
pangaia
(24,324 posts)PS - As you I am sure know, most orchestras play Beatles tunes when they need cash. The players for the most part go to sleep.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)wtf??? don't talk to a Veteran that way that was wrong
pangaia
(24,324 posts)But.. it was not meant against veterans, military or whatever. That is not my feeling.
What was meant was the idea that because he was in the military, he worked harder than I did, which was his accusation and insult toward me... that I was just some little shit 'playing in a band.'
pangaia
(24,324 posts)I mean, do your nails bleeds scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to find shit?
boobooday
(7,869 posts)Scrapping, like many of us must do.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Is that "working poor" in your neighborhood?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)FIRST, he couldn't make a decent living on his own. POOR !!
Now he makes too much RICH !!
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)..They haven't done anything useful in 8 years.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)I think I've seen it all now.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)If you and I were sent out to do a job and all we did was fight with our colleagues and got nothing done, we would be fired regardless of how much we were making.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)to what Hillary makes for one wall street speech, I have to conclude that either she is overpaid by orders of magnitude for her work, or she is providing more services to them than just a speech.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)your work is worth what you are paid and you are paid what your worth. I'm fairly sure that if you were offered thousands of dollars for a speech, you wouldn't turn down the offer.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)for a "speech" because I don't have hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of quid pro quo to offer in return.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)... are they are automatically indebted to those who paid money to to here that speech? Is that how it works? Do we give no credit to anyone for having integrity? Barack Obama took large contributions from Wall Street to his PAC's. Are you also accusing President Obama of being on the side of Wall Street during his Presidency? By your logic he was deeply indebted to those who gave his PAC lots of money.
I know you are not, right? Because there is absolutely no evidence of that President Obama favored Wall Street just as there is no evidence that Wall Street money influenced Hillary Clinton.
So let's be honest with each other for a change and let's call this what it is. It is an opportunity for Bernie Sanders to attack Clinton even though he worked with her for eight years in the Senate and he knows where she stands on these issues. But that's politics.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)The money Hillary received is called investment.
--imm
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Jesus...you are a republican in dem clothing, aren't you?
Is that why women make less than men...cause they aren't worth as much?
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)....then you try to change the subject. Just because I don't subscribe to a socialist ideology doesn't make me any less a progressive, a moderate progressive maybe, yet a progressive never the less. I suggest that you take your allies as they are because there are far to many in this country that view "progressive" as a dirty word.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)That talking point about you are paid what you are worth is a very staunch republican talking point. If you believe that, then own it. It is not a progressive talking point.
I'm not the one who changed the subject. You are the one who brought it up. I never expected to hear that ridiculous idea coming from anyone on this forum, not even the centrists. Progressive? I doubt you are an economic progressive. Not from things I've seen you say here in this thread. You may be socially progressive...I don't know you well enough to know that.
So, are you going to answer my question about why women are paid less than men? Are they worth less? You said "you are worth what you are paid".
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Obviously you do, so this conversation is over.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)You said it, and if you believe it, own it. If it disturbs you to be called on it, maybe you need to think about what you said.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)connected to the back bone...
Now THAT is "humerous."
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)Dear lord in heaven.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I'm thinking about field workers, breaking their backs in the hot sun, just trying to make a living, and many not able to live in their own home because they don't earn enough. I'm thinking of lots of people working more than one minimum wage job to exist, and still can't afford their own health care, and working how many hours a week?
But they are only worth what they are paid.
I cannot believe this whole thread. It was a set up from the beginning and we should have just not touched it. We should have let it wither on the vine.
Actually, it should probably be hidden. I'm not an alerter, but this thread is despicable.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)My father was the son of a share cropper who, with his brothers and sisters, did the back breaking work cutting sugar cane by hand as a boy. He spelled his father with his job as a night watchman in a sugar refinery so his dad could get some sleep so he could work the next day. He studied by the light of an oil lamp because his family couldn't afford electricity. But he was lucky in that as the youngest he was needed as much in the fields as his older brothers, so he was able to continue his school work and then work his way though college instead of having to quit school in the third and fourth grade like his brothers.
By those standard I had a much easier childhood, but Dad didn't earn much teaching and mom, as was normal in those days, stayed home and cared for the kids. Compared to others we didn't have much. Money was always and issue around out house and the only thing ever heard my parents argue about. I remember more than once dad had just cancelled our health insurance to save money only to have mom need operations soon there after.
I had a real job non-stop since I was fourteen and I am now much older than I want to admit. My first job was a bag boy in a grocery store where I worked my butt off for ten cent tips. But before that starting at age 10 I cut grass and worked in neighbors' yards to earn money for extra curricular actives that my parents couldn't afford. I worked my way through college spending 5 hours a day on my job while other kids were studying and having fun.
So don't lecture me about hard work - I'll bet the majority of you have never done manual labor in your entire lives. I worked my butt off for everything I have now, but I know that I was damn lucky. Lucky to have the parents that stressed a strong education even when I was a small child. Lucky to have a stable environment and I had lucky to the personality to accept the challenges I faced. I see that others have not been so fortunate and face much greater challenges and, unlike some who have made it in life, I constantly want to lend a helping hand to other not so fortunate.
Yes, people earn do less because because others are willing to do the same work which requires no education or special skills for the same wages. That's how the world works. The answer is preparing those people with the training which will allow them to earn more because sooner or later someone is going to invent a machine to do the manual work that they are doing now. That has happened throughout history and it is a trend is going to accelerate.
And yes there needs to be a minimum wage such that those who work at such jobs can at least earn enough to afford the essentials of life. And while I haven't a clue how to do it, that minimum wage needs to be graduated by the cost of living in the area where the work is done. What is a living wage in rural and small town America is not a living wage in large cities.
And yes heath care should be a right, not a privilege, but I don't believe in your so called revolution because it isn't going to happen. I live in a real world where we are not suddenly going to put every health insurance company out of business and force every doctor and health care worker to take half the annual income they earn now. That's like shooting for the moon with a rocket that can only lift 10 feet off of the ground. We need doers running our government who can make tangible gains like getting Medicaid extended to those who can't afford to buy insurance. We don't need dreamers who will shoot for the stars and fail miserably.
Like or not you and moderate progressives like me want the same things; where we differ is on how to get there. Like a lot of young people today you want instant gratification so you favor a revolution which is almost certain to fail and take the Democratic party down with it. We favor a realistic approach where victories will come much slower and will be hard earned. But I will take small victories over abject failure every time.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)People are worth what they are paid.
Those words are wrong and you need to think about that.
People are paid what they are desperate enough to work for, because capitalism does not work by itself. Some people will pay people much less than they are worth, because they "can".
And you still have not answered my question. Are women worth less? Because they are paid less...and I know this as a fact, because I am a woman and I was paid less than a man for the exact same job, many times in my life. And I am college educated. So, no...people are not paid what they are worth. Some people are paid a lot more than they are worth and many many people are paid a lot less than they are worth.
Oh, and you do know that the world is working on thinking computers that can perform the job that educated people do now, don't you? like even working the stock exchange?
Hmmm...how does that work with your theory that people should not be paid more because they are just doing unskilled labor?
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)The United State was founded as, and to this day remains a capitalistic society. The vast majority of its citizens would not to change that fact if they could. If we don't accept this, we will try to find solutions to problems starting with a false premise.
You say that "some people are paid a lot more than they are worth and many many people are paid a lot less than they are worth." Well, that's just your prejudiced opinion. I also might think that professional baseball players should be paid a lot less and teachers should be paid more. But that is my prejudiced opinion. Obviously others believe differently. That's how it works in a capitalistic society and that's not going to change in your lifetime. But the US is not alone in that structure.
Even in countries like Denmark what people earn based on the market's demand for their skills. As I see it we need a government that sands down the jagged edges of a capitalist system so people are not hurt by its excesses. That has been done to some extent in this country and to greater extent in countries like Denmark which have the advantage of having much more homogeneous societies.
However, any revolution which attempts to change the US into Denmark over night is doomed to failure - the American people are simply not going to permit it.
Of course I am for equal pay for equal work for women. But the key here the phrase is "for equal work". The situation that men on a whole out still earn women has many causes and not all are based on prestigious against women. One the biggest is the difference in pay is traditional gender based jobs. That will change only slowly over time as both more women and more men enter nontraditional job types.
If you want proof of that you should research the job pay situation in socialist counties like Denmark which adopted legislation which mandated equal pay or equal work in 1976. Even after all of these years men in Denmark still earn on average significantly more than women.
Danish Equal Pay Legislation That's and older article. This much more recent article shows the gender pay gap in Denmark to be about 16%. Gender pay gap
Again people are paid what they are worth even in Denmark. Even when equal pay for equal work is mandated by law, women are on average paid less because they are not doing as much of the work which is in high demand.
Now we have a long way to go in this country. The US is currently 36th in the world in pay equity, but a revolution which seeks to correct the problem over night is doomed to failure.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)You say that Some people are paid a lot more than they are worth and many many people are paid a lot less than they are worth. Well that's just your prejudiced opinion.
With this statement, you've shown your prejudiced opinion.
Of course I am for equal pay for equal work for women. But the key here the phrase is "for equal work". The fact that men on a whole out still earn women has many causes and not all are based on prestigious against women. One the biggest is the difference in pay is traditional gender based jobs. That will change only slowly over time as both more women and more men enter nontraditional job types.
Women are not requesting equal pay for unequal jobs. Talk to Hillary about this if you think I'm wrong. She has always fought for equal pay for women.
If you think the only reason women are complaining about pay equity, you've been ignoring reality.
In low pay jobs, women are usually paid the same, but as they rise into management positions, or college level jobs, they are often paid less, even for the same job. This is a known fact.
Why am I thinking you are a man?
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)What part of "I support equal pay for equal work" don't you understand?
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)And then you went on to qualify why you think it's wrong...that women are not asking for real equal pay for equal work.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)... "equal pay for pay for women, at least for equal work' and what we can realistically achieve. I was pointing out that even Denmark which has had a law for 40 years mandating that women and men be paid equally for equal work still has significant differences between what the average man is paid and what the average woman is paid.
I am also saying that what people earn is based on the "perceived" value of their work and that this is true throughout the world, even in socialist countries. (Notice I didn't say that it is based on the "actual" value of their work.) A professional soccer player in Denmark still make a lot more than a college professor. It is what it is - just accept it.
Now you an accept people like me as allies or you can treat us as as enemies; on such matters you have to do what you think is in your best interests.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)(Notice I didn't say that it is based on the "actual" value of their work.)
You said "People are paid what they are worth".
You need to quit trying to deflect from it, or defend it.
easttexaslefty
(1,554 posts)My husband actually is a carpenter. A damn good carpenter working on million dollar homes. Our real income has done nothing but go down in the last 25 years. Not because of how hard he works or his skill set. It's because wages are stagnant.
Response to CajunBlazer (Reply #216)
TubbersUK This message was self-deleted by its author.
easttexaslefty
(1,554 posts)That's bullshit. Thanks on behalf of us blue collar workers loosing ground pay wise for the last 25 fucking years.
Thanks a whole fucking lot.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Heck, they would probably pay their own expenses just for the opportunity.
But former Secretaries of State are evidently in high demand:
Colin Powell gets $100K to $200K per speech
Condoleezza Rice recently knocked down $150K for a speech at the University of Missouri
I don't think anyone is hiring Powell or Rice to bribe them.
And there are others who are paid big money:
Al Gore's going rate is $150K
Ben Bernanke charges $200K per speech in the US and $400K in Asia
Sarah Palin was getting $100K per speech after she wrapped up her stint as a VP candidate.
I think Hillary is worth at least double that of Shara Palin, don't you think? Yet Bernie Sander said last night that he hasn't been paid for giving speeches. I bet he would jump at the chance, but evidently he hasn't had any offers. What do you think that means?
Fearless
(18,421 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)He's paying good money to talk to them, not the other way around.
And are you sure his campaign isn't busing folks in?
Fearless
(18,421 posts)And four million of them are paying to hear him speak.
It's not 600k, but I have a feeling that an average donation of $27 is a lot more important to them than 600k is to Goldman Sachs.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Just kidding, but you do realize that contributions are totally divorced from Sanders' events except that contributions allow him to continue his campaign? People aren't paying him to speak, right? There is a big difference.
Let's see how much his speeches command after the primaries are over.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Money doesn't matter to some people.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)...and young people flocking to Bernie's rallies. All they want to talk about is their student loans. Most kids are going to college for one main reason, they want to make good money later.
There probably was a time when kids wanted to be doctors and nurses to they wanted to help people and cure their ills. I am sure that there are still some with that motivation. But by the time I graduated from high school that was mostly gone.
There were seven in my graduating class who went on to be medical doctors. It was a class of only 57 and I knew them all very well. The chief motivation for each and every one of them was making money and perhaps being well know in the community. They were and still are fine people and they all became good and some very good doctors, but making money was their first priory. There was one person who went into medicine who didn't feel that way. He loved animals so became a vet.
Talk to young people today and you will see exactly what I mean. They haven't figured out yet that money isn't everything. Hopefully many will figure out that money and position can't buy happiness. Some will learn the the hard way. Some will never learn at all.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)What is true for you isn't true for everyone.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I just worked a rally Sunday in Greenville. The crowd was purely organic - even in a red state.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Well I would hope they weren't inorganic, like little robots.
But I starting thinking - maybe I'm not up on the latest slang and maybe this person is using the word "organic" in way I am unfamiliar. So I looked up "organic" in the Urban Dictionary, but found only one unfamiliar usage: 4) In popular culture, a term applied in line with the most rabid intentions of New Age pseudoscience, ultimately from the mouths of people who would like to have scientists burned at the stake. Is the what you meant?
merrily
(45,251 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)We were discussing the younger generation - college students and young adults who support Sanders.
merrily
(45,251 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Your Question "Which of those people is running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS right now?"
What are you talking about? When you are referring to "those people", which people are you talking about?
boobooday
(7,869 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)I can't be bothered anymore to do anything but mock.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Good night to you!
merrily
(45,251 posts)Rest well.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Good cop bad cop.
I think it was orchestrated.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)These days, young people can't afford to work odd jobs and earn a living. They're chained to a corporate desk working for peanuts to pay off large student loans and so that they can have health insurance.
I see nothing wrong with this past. What's the difference between writing and creating documentaries and today's equivalent of blogging and creating YouTube videos? There are many talented bloggers and YouTubers.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)take a look at his wealth, is there anyone else in the race who isn't a millionaire?
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)...but I look at his net worth and I'm a bit dumbfounded by it. Where did his money go? He has been a member of Congress for 25 years. Should have a higher net worth than $500,000 unless he's giving a ton of it away to charity in which case I would say that is very commendable on his part. I am by no means a 1 percenter in salary or life savings, but I have a net worth over $400,000 and I've only been out of college for 8 years.
Maybe he has given away a bunch of his income to good causes. If he hasn't, then I am pretty surprised to see such a low net worth for someone who has had a very good salary for at least the last 25 years. If he's not giving it to charity, what did he spend the money on?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Clinton's numbers must be looking pretty dismal to bring up THAT lame-ass smear again
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)I support him and have said a lot of very hard truths about the Clintons on this website. They are the very definition of corruption in our political system and I believe Bernie is a lot closer to honest when it comes to his positions over time and his lack of funding from mega corporations. So please, quit accusing me of smearing him. I haven't read any of these attacks that you're referring to. I just saw that his net worth was $500k and thought it was strange for someone in Congress 25 years to have that low of a net worth.
Maybe he is giving a ton of it to charity or using it to fund his re-election campaigns (whereas the Clintons would beg Wall Street for campaign money). If that is what he's been doing, then that just solidifies him as the real deal even more in my book. It's an honest question as a Millenial who ain't rich but is on track to have a lot more than $500,000 by age 74.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)The "he's not rich enough" thing was all over DU as the smear-of-the-day awhile back. It made no sense then or now.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)Congressional Reps and Senators make a good living. That is the salary we pay them with our tax dollars. There are a bunch of them who go way above and beyond that into a corrupt form of existence. This includes insider stock trading by members of both parties.
But still, 25 years and a net worth of $500k? Something doesn't add up there given the type of salary he was earning during that time. Like I said, maybe he is spending a bunch of it on charity or re-election campaigns since he doesn't beg the corporations for money to prop up his campaigns. He is unique in that regard and it would explain why his net worth is much, much lower than others who have been in Congress the same amount of time. They keep going back to Wall Street for campaign money while he doesn't.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)My net worth is about fifty bucks.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)I figure if you make $100,000 per year over 25 years, you should be well over $1 million in net worth. Granted, maybe he had a lot of debt before he got into Congress. Since 1991, a Congressional Rep makes at least $100,000 per year. I would think he made a lot more than that as Senator in recent years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salaries_of_members_of_the_United_States_Congress
I will also say that part of my net worth was $64,000 inheritance from my grandmother. God bless her. That money came from a class action lawsuit against Exxon for asbestos when my grandfather worked in one of their refineries. He ended up dying of lung cancer and the doctors believed that the asbestos played at least some part in it. The money from the lawsuit helped take care of her for many years after he passed away.
The inheritance helped pay off my sister's student loan debt (Masters degree) and paid off the $12,000 remaining on my car loan at the time. I have been extremely lucky. Parents paid for school (undergrad only). That's the biggest gift any parent can give a child these days. School is just way too expensive! Very grateful for the opportunities I've had. Boss has been very generous to me with raises and so forth too.
cali
(114,904 posts)TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)Why bother posting if it was not worth responding to? Anyway, I agreed with your other post about Bernie's cost of living in DC. Bound to be a lot more expensive than my experience in Texas.
merrily
(45,251 posts)What is your point, anyway? That Sanders may not be cheap enough to be President?
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)As a US Senator Bernie makes now $174,000 a year plus expenses. When he was first elected to congress he made $101,000 a year ($174 in equivalent 2016 money) plus expenses. If during those 25 years he was in congress Bernie saved only $500,000 that doesn't say much for his money managing skills. I am younger, make far less, and have saved up a lot more for retirement.
Conservatively he can use about 4% a year of that $500,000 of that for retirement, maybe 7% if he pushes it. At 7% he could use $35K a year + Social Security checks if he qualifies. That not very much for someone who is now knocking $174K a year.
I don't think he is going to be retiring anytime soon.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Where the fuck is all of Bernie's money ???
Something smells really dirty and fishy to me.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)which could be as high as 80% of his salary and then he'd have SS on top of it. (too lazy to do the actual math for his years of service, sorry).
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Do Congressmen pay into SS as well?
noamnety
(20,234 posts)and I used to be. We have the same pension system, same health care as congress. He pays into SS, as did I. So I'm going to hazard a guess and say yes.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)is set for retirement after 25 years in Congress. So he probably doesn't need any more than $500K in savings.
Still he has been paid the $2016 equivalent of $174K a year for 25 years. In today's money that is the equivalent of $4.35 Million. One has to have a bit of an extravagant life style to blow through that much money and have only $500K to show for it and one wouldn't figure Bernie for having and extravagant life style.
With a decent interest rate of 7% one would just have to average putting away an average of only $7,000 a year for 25 years to have a stash of $500K. Where did all of the money go?
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)His private life is private. But he has a large family, counting grandkids, and he's big on family, so he probably helps them out a lot.
And if you find my post about his assets, you will find his assets are currently 750K, not 500K and that does not include his two dwellings.
Pangaia was right...you really must have bloody fingers by now...scratching that bottom of the barrel so hard and long.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Bernie's finances became every body's business, just the same as Hillary's finances (which have been attacked repeatedly) became everybody's business.
Has Bernie ever talked about Hillary's finances - yes, repeatedly. Has Hillary ever talked about Bernie's finances - no.
So if you continue cling to the notion a politician's finances are "nobody's business", why does how Hillary and Bill made money belong in the public sphere.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Not her assets. And if you want to know his assets, it's pretty much on-line, but not necessarily provided all in one place.
But, what I meant about it being none of your business, is how he spends what he earns. As long as he's not doing anything illegal with it, it's no-ones business.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)How much money does it take to travel to work when you don't work in the state you live in and to maintain two residences. And possible give money to charity also.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)DC is an expensive place to live for sure.
merrily
(45,251 posts)The other poster is correct: the not rich enough meme has been debunked here more than once. And it never made sense to begin with.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)I worked like a dog for 50 years and barely have 2 or 3 percent of that wealth, your $400,000 that is. By my light that means Bernie more likely to understand me then you are and both of you probably know my life better then someone who's earned $153 million in under 15 years.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)I certainly believe he is way more in touch with the regular people of this country than the Clintons or other politicians who are entrenched in helping the corporations screw over everyone else.
cali
(114,904 posts)He has to maintain a home in Washington. He has kids.
Just ridiculous.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)I live in Texas. Cost of living here is pretty cheap. DC is probably very expensive. Even for me (I am a cheapskate big time) I'd probably have a tough time saving anywhere near the rate I do in Texas.
shawn703
(2,702 posts)But having a $400,000 net worth eight years out of college puts you at about the top 5% for your age group. Your financial experiences are not ordinary. Also, he has to maintain two households on something like $175,000 a year. I'm not sure what the cost to maintain a household in Vermont area is, but it's pretty expensive just maintaining one in the DC area.
TTUBatfan2008
(3,623 posts)...for starters, my parents paid for my degree. We were not rich by any means when I was a kid and I really don't know how they paid for it. They mentioned to me that they had some life insurance policies that they cashed in which helped pay for both my sister's undergrad and my undergrad degrees. My sister ended up getting her Masters with student loans and it has been a much bigger struggle for her.
I lost my job 6 months after graduating due to the 2008 financial crisis. I then managed to find another job only a few weeks later that has turned out much, much better than I ever hoped. Boss has been very generous with raises and so forth. My grandmother passed away in 2010 and left $64,000 each to me, my sister, and our first cousin. It paid off my sister's student loans and it paid off my car loan at the time. Our cousin is still in high school. Hoping that the money will help him a lot with his college expenses when the time comes.
I realize how lucky I am. So many others in my age group are struggling very much just to get by. Our generation has been screwed over pretty bad with the insane rising costs of college and the insistence of our parents' generation that all of us had to go to college. I feel like many boomers don't understand how difficult it is for younger adults in this country right now. I'm damn lucky in my age group, but I am very aware of how everything has been going in recent years for Millenials. We are basically being handed a $20 Trillion credit card bill by our parents and meanwhile many of us are drowning in student loan debt.
It sucks big time. We need very serious changes in this country and I would gladly pay more taxes to help fix some of the mess that has been handed to my generation, especially the vast majority of my generation who are not doing as well as me.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Bernie Sanders on Thursday reported less than $750,000 in assets all of it in his wifes name according to his presidential personal financial disclosure form.Sanders $174,000 salary as a member of the Senate was not listed on the form. The couples real estate assets are not disclosed, either. According to campaign spokesman Michael Briggs, the senator owns at least two homes, one in Vermont and one on Capitol Hill.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/bernie-sanders-wife-accounts-for-reported-assets-120261
Plus, he's a family man with lots of kids and grandkids and probably spends a lot on them. And yes, he does give to charities.
His proceeds from his book and his appearance on the Bill Maher show went to charity, and I suspect there is a lot more that we haven't heard of. He's pretty quiet about his private life.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)(obviously it's just a gut feeling) that he and his wife do give a lot of money away. He truly cares about people - it's very evident to me.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders
peace13
(11,076 posts)I realize he's Jewish but teacher, carpenter and healer are about as close as one can get!
elleng
(131,040 posts)After graduating from college, Sanders initially worked in New York City in a variety of jobs, including Head Start teacher, psychiatric aide, and carpenter.[26] In 1968 Sanders moved to Vermont because he had been "captivated by rural life." After his arrival there he worked as a carpenter, filmmaker, and writer[40] who created and sold "radical film strips" and other educational materials to schools.[41]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Such an honest question
Since you're too lazy answer this "honest" question yourself, here you go:
Private careers
After graduating from college, Sanders initially worked in New York City in a variety of jobs, including Head Start teacher, psychiatric aide, and carpenter.[26] In 1968 Sanders moved to Vermont because he had been "captivated by rural life." After his arrival there he worked as a carpenter, filmmaker, and writer[40] who created and sold "radical film strips" and other educational materials to schools.[41]
Liberty Union campaigns
Sanders began his electoral political career in 1971 as a member of the Liberty Union Party, which originated in the anti-war movement and the People's Party. He ran as the Liberty Union candidate for governor of Vermont in 1972 and 1976 and as a candidate for U.S. senator in 1972 and 1974.[42] In the 1974 Senatorial race, Sanders finished third (5,901 votes; 4.1%) behind the victor, 33-year-old Chittenden County State's Attorney Patrick Leahy (D, VI; 70,629 votes; 49.4%), and two-term incumbent U.S. Representative Dick Mallary (R; 66,223 votes; 46.3%).[43][44]
The 1976 campaign proved to be the zenith of Liberty Union's influence, with Sanders collecting 11,000 votes for Governor and the party forcing the races for Lieutenant Governor and Secretary of State to be decided by the state legislature when its vote total prevented either the Republican or Democratic candidates for those offices from garnering a majority of votes.[45] The campaign drained the finances and energy of the Liberty Union, however, and in October 1977 less than a year after the conclusion of the 1976 campaign Sanders and the Liberty Union candidate for Attorney General, Nancy Kaufman, announced their retirement from the party.[46]
Following his resignation from Liberty Union, Sanders worked as a writer and the director of the nonprofit American People's Historical Society (APHS).[47] While with the APHS, he made a 30-minute documentary about American Socialist leader and presidential candidate Eugene V. Debs.[29][48]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders#Private_careers
cali
(114,904 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Must be a new memo out there: Lazy Jew Didn't Want to Work Until Taxpayers Paid Him
Response to arcane1 (Reply #8)
Post removed
cali
(114,904 posts)Or it's clear that you made that up.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)Can you imagine the outrage if that was flipped? If the Bernie supports were accusing Hillary of being a kept woman while she was first lady the freaking internet would explode.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Try again.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,628 posts)Got caught in a lie and won't own up to it? How surprising!
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Yeah, that's a winning strategy!
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Do you know what his longest held job was and how long was it? Again, I'm looking at early working years like when he was in college thru late 30's. It matters to me. I worked through college, went back to work when my babies were weeks old, juggled a family, a career and sometimes worked two full times jobs. How does Bernie identify with me?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)He identifies with you because he was doing the same thing as you.
How does Hillary identify with you?
cali
(114,904 posts)Hey, at least he wasn't a union busting Wal-Mart board member. And he wasn't involved in skeezy cattle future crap. And sorry, that is no right wing smear.
polly7
(20,582 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)He is applying for a pretty important job. When I met you I was pregnant with my son who is now 12. I went back to work when he was 2 weeks old to keep our lights on and a roof over our head.
polly7
(20,582 posts)how hard it is. He wasn't raised rich - he worked, at many things, it seems. I can't even remember all the places I've worked. I had my power cut off a few times. That has absolutely no bearing on the many, many years he's spent in politics FIGHTING for ordinary people and I'm sure his early experiences helped a lot with realizing the things ordinary people need.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I always will.
polly7
(20,582 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)What you say you did has zip to do with... anything.
I loath "hippie bashing".
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Since she is applying for the same job.
While First Lady of Arkansas from 1979 to 1981, and 1983 to 1992, she led a task force that reformed Arkansas' public school system, and served on the board of directors of Wal-Mart among other corporations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton
This is how Hillary started, with a law degree from college...then when she could not pass the bar in DC, where she worked as a congressional legal council, she went back to Arkansas, where she married Bill, and passed the bar there and worked as an attorny, and became a governor's wife, and then a Senator, and then a FLOTUS.
How does that relate to your life experiences? And how does it reflect on his work ethic? It seems that Bernie's early days of employment (like many young people right out of college) was more like yours than Hillary's was.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I think FLOTUS came before senator but anyway... Right now I am so worried about Trump and the repuke voter turn out vs ours! I don' want to argue with you! I'm too worried about OUR country.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)If you don't want to argue, why did you start a thread that you knew would get people arguing and bring out posts like a few of the posts here that are amazingly ugly and making shit up about Bernie and his work ethic. I suspect that may have been the whole purpose of this thread.
Oh, yeah, and of course that whole thing about his first child was brought into this too. I knew it would end up going there.
Yeah...peace...whatever that means in this context.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)But your side brings about all kinds of stuff like that about the Clinton's. I have never been foul about Bernie's family.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)You knew what you were doing when you started this thread.
I hope you are happy.
MADem
(135,425 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)What do YOU do, for all that matters?
polly7
(20,582 posts)- you have. What's your worth?
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Most jobs are not 24/7 like being POTUS is.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)I've worked with several campaigns for various local or state offices over the last decade or so. It's actually hard work to run for office - which is why so few people actually do it.
cali
(114,904 posts)in the Kingdom. He made educational films.
Why not do your own homework? It's really not difficult.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)just like another well known Jewish Socialist...... I think they still talk about that guy in some circles to this day
Funny thing Conservatives aren't the only ones who seem to hate the guy.......
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Jewish carpenters must have a lot of time to think.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)They end up in more philosophical pursuits.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Feed the poor... Something else he shared with that other "Jewish socialist"!
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/07/bernie-sanders-vermont-119927
By comparison, look at what our current Speaker of the House had as one of his only non-government jobs!
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)more I hate him
noamnety
(20,234 posts)Think about it - where are all his finished pieces?
We all know Noah's ark. You'd think the son of God could have hammered together something memorable.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Jesus wouldn't be alive for about 3,000 more years after Noah built the Ark, if we're going by Biblical timelines.
TheLogicalSong
(44 posts)And spent much of those days you question as part of the working poor.
And as part of the working poor, he's the only candidate with which I identify.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Rodham attended Wellesley College, where she was active in student politics and elected senior class president before graduating in 1969. She then attended Yale Law School, where she met Bill Clinton. Graduating with honors in 1973, she went on to enroll at Yale Child Study Center, where she took courses on children and medicine and completed one post-graduate year of study.
Hillary worked at various jobs during her summers as a college student. In 1971, she first came to Washington, D.C. to work on U.S. Senator Walter Mondale's sub-committee on migrant workers. In the summer of 1972, she worked in the western states for the campaign of Democratic presidential nominee George McGovern.
In the spring of 1974, Rodham became a member of the presidential impeachment inquiry staff, advising the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives during the Watergate Scandal.
(Chief Counsel Jerry Zeifman would later contend that he fired Clinton from the committee for what he deemed as unethical professional behavior connected to Nixon's due process. These allegations have been contradicted by other media sources that deny Zeifman's authority over the young attorney at this time, with no comment from Clinton herself.)
After President Richard M. Nixon resigned in August, she became a faculty member of the University of Arkansas Law School in Fayetteville, where her Yale Law School classmate and boyfriend Bill Clinton was teaching as well.
http://www.biography.com/people/hillary-clinton-9251306#early-years
Armstead
(47,803 posts)THere are a number of good articles about his early days online, that have already been posted here (I posted a couple.)
But I don't think I'll waste my time trying to dig therm out again.
MADem
(135,425 posts)became mayor.
I know from assorted articles that he was a lousy carpenter, really lousy, that he wrote articles that were paid by the word, and that he stole electricity from the apt. basement with a long extension cord, and was late on the rent alot --and that is according to his FRIENDS.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/07/bernie-sanders-vermont-119927
By 1968, he was living in Vermont full time. On March 17, 1969, according to records, Sanders bought another property, in out-of-the-way Stannard, with a population of fewer than 200 people, in the rural area of Vermont called the Northeast Kingdom. Four days later, Levi Noah Sanders was born, at Brightlook Hospital in St. Johnsbury, Vermont; according to his birth certificate, his mother was a woman named Susan Campbell Mott.....He shared custody of his son in an informal arrangement with Mott, according to people who knew them. She was around a lot, Nancy Barnett, a friend who lived nearby, told me. Barnett called Mott a pretty quiet, private person. Sanders rented a small brick duplex at 295 1/2 Maple Street that was filled with not much furniture and not much food in the fridge but stacks of checked-out library books and scribbled-on legal pads. His son, who called his father Bernard, had an upstairs bedroom.
Pretty sparse, Gene Bergman, an old friend, said about the apartment.
Stark and dark, said Darcy Troville, a fellow Liberty Unionite who lived around the corner and shared with Sanders homemade jellies and jams.
The electricity was turned off a lot, Barnett said. I remember him running an extension cord down to the basement. He couldnt pay his bills.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/07/bernie-sanders-vermont-119927#ixzz411eCWkBM
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I worked quite a few job jobs over the years before I found what I was good at.
Is that suddenly a Bad Thing now?
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)some people use the phrases like "regular jobs" "regular people" I know I am an "irregular person" but I just say people and jobs
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Don't be surprised if it happens!
Arazi
(6,829 posts)That sounds an awful lot like working poor to me even right down to the extension cord for electricity
MADem
(135,425 posts)impacted his earning power more than any "Woe is me" poverty of the "working poor."
I mean, really, he had a SWELL college education by this point in time, he'd traveled abroad to Israel, he had experience doing a lot of things, that should have looked just dandy on a resume--isn't that supposed to be the panacea?
Of course, if you don't WANT to go to work every morning and do that daily grind thing, that can be a problem when it comes to getting a regular paycheck.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)please proceed governor
MADem
(135,425 posts)Here, you can have this back--LOL!
cali
(114,904 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)You may have noticed, he's been doing that daily grind thing for several decades now.
Your lame-ass attempt at character assassination is making a fool out of you.
MADem
(135,425 posts)He was able to FIND jobs--he just didn't seem to LIKE them. That's his problem.
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him work nine to five and get a paycheck at the end of the week.
He had choices, his poverty had more to do with his dislike of the daily routine than any "poor me" poverty.
You have to actually WORK to be considered "working poor."
And if you think what he has been doing is a DAILY GRIND, you need to grab a clue--do some homework and check out how many days legislators actually work.
They call it RECESS quite aptly.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Thanks!
MADem
(135,425 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)You really are something. How low will they go, we wondered. Now we know.
Hope I didn't get your gender wrong...I always think of your user name as Ma Dem.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Disppointing.
MADem
(135,425 posts)forward as "the" solution to full employment--is "right wingy?"
Well Sanders is "right wingy" then. He's telling all these young kids that free college will solve their problems, that they'll get that education and have no trouble finding a job. He's not setting a very good example, is he?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)You're embarrassing yourself.
MuseRider
(34,112 posts)I should add to my list but sometimes I need something to keep my blood flowing.
I bet there are many 30 year olds who would tire from what he is doing right now but he apparently is thriving. He has found where his heart is and what he loves and it is for the country. If it took him years of floating around doing smaller jobs to learn all of this, and that is what it takes unless you are just going to be poll tested and develop policies around who you are talking to, then I am very fine with it.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)He's not telling anyone "free college will solve their problems" or that "they'll have no trouble finding a job" - he's saying that everyone who wants a college education should be able to get one. What any adult chooses to do with their life is up to that person.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)The veil has been lifted.
Finally.
easttexaslefty
(1,554 posts)Response to cyberswede (Reply #85)
Post removed
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Can you point to a source that shows Sanders is telling people that college will "solve their problems?"
A college education is one tool in the toolkit for people who want to use it. There are plenty of people for whom a college education is out of reach, and many more who will be in debt for years and years after attending college. Providing an opportunity for those folks isn't saying that college is the end-all solution for everything.
Your implication that he was a lazy ne'er do well because he didn't hold down jobs approved by you is...well...right wingy.
on edit: aw dang...it took me too long to reply - I didn't realize this was hidden. Never mind, obviously.
Beowulf
(761 posts)I have to give you some credit. You guys are really good at the politics of personal destruction. Unfortunately, our side is really good at taking the bait. Of course the whole point of this tactic is to distract voters away from discussing issues. That must mean you are ok with the status quo.
polly7
(20,582 posts)them get jobs??
MuseRider
(34,112 posts)he is just a lazy old man, it seems that is what you are implying. WTF? You do remember the times right? The 60's? Even if you were not alive then I was and I can tell you many, many of us did that because it was possible to do those things then and be poor but not dying from poverty. Nothing better than to have done lots of things, it widens your viewpoint and fills your brain with knowledge. People need those things so what is wrong with doing them?
So where do you get your information that he did not want the daily grind thing? Is it because it is apparent now that he flits through his life without a care of concern the lazy bum? Why does it matter what he did back when he was young?
My god that is nasty made up crap.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Even when you think they won't go any lower, there they go.
The Clinton camp must be terrified.
I welcome their terror!
MuseRider
(34,112 posts)and I am getting really tired of the made up stories. At least they are easy to beat down but damn it is old.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Congratulations, I guess.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)There is a whole mountain of republican talking points to employ against Bernie.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)And no one believe them except for the Fan Club. Not even the Republicans.
MADem
(135,425 posts)you've got. Congratulations back at you, for trying and failing to play the "Feel Guilty For Poor Bernie" card.
Nothing wrong with noticing that a guy with a college degree, in a time when loads of jobs WERE available, wasn't...errrrr...."living up to his potential."
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Barf.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I think I'll follow your example. I can only handle so much stupid, and I can go to FR if I want that.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Last edited Wed Feb 24, 2016, 02:58 AM - Edit history (1)
eom
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I think more than a fair question. Interesting about his electric service being shut off. If he can not keep he power on for his son how can I expect him to help me with mine?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Are you sure you're a liberal?
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)To insinuate otherwise is ridiculous - and frankly embarrassing for you.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Tirelessly must be a matter of opinion.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)You? Not so much.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I'm sorry, but you just totally gave yourself (and your motives with this thread) away.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I don't think we should under-estimate Trump. BTW. Hello fellow Oregonian!
polly7
(20,582 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I actually think he is a good man. I just want to know if he is REALLY going to work when he becomes president.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)And fake.
polly7
(20,582 posts)He argues for what he believes like it's life and death .... scared me a bit at first he was so passionate. There's one I watched re health-care - he completely eviscerated the woman who was lying about it. Have you seen how hard he's working with his campaign? I couldn't keep up with him, I don't know how he does it. I think he's a very, very good man and I wish he could be cloned.
(I wasn't saying you thought he was a horrible man - it was the poster I replied to).
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I couldn't keep up with Hillary either. I like his ideas. I just do not think they're practical for the US TODAY. I honestly do not think he can get anything he believes in passed.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)There's a better solution to carry out those goals!
Join the Republican Party!
Sorry, but I want someone committed to working for us! He might not get it to happen over night (Rome wasn't built in a day), but incrementally we will then ultimately get what we want. Getting Republican agenda things "done" will only hurt us more than help us.
He will run a justice department that just doesn't cut deals with Wall Street that lets them just get away with relatively small fines that they right off as a cost of doing business and continue with their CRIMINAL acts by their leaders that go unpunished and continue to happen now. Bernie will have an AG that actually prosecutes wrongdoing, and starts sending the message out that if you break the law to screw average Americans, you WILL pay for it in all ways!
Yes, it will help if he has a Democratic congress with less corporatized Democrats in it as a majority, but the message that the changes everyone wants can happen if these people get replaced and there will be a lot of movement in the midterms to help him do that if he's able to do many things as the executive that shows he's committed to change, in a fashion that we haven't seen in this party since LBJ LIBERALLY kicked some people's butts or threatened to do so to get things like medicare passed in his day.
stage left
(2,965 posts)He quite clearly gives a damn.There was a poster on and on about how Bernie had "abandoned" South Carolina. Yeah, he left or will be leaving. He had at least 12 other places to be. I don't know how he does it either.
polly7
(20,582 posts)in retirement and resting with his family because he cares so much about his country and the people in it. That's what's so sad about seeing some of the horrible things said against him - some can't even bring themselves to imagine the heart and courage it takes to do what he is - and it's all for them.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)It's a lot harder to make his ideas reality. A lot of people say, " why not try?" Well, IMO we would just end up turning power over to the repukes and in another BUSH situation. We can not afford the risk RIGHT NOW.. That is my stance.
polly7
(20,582 posts)a man of honesty and integrity, I believe that will help him when it comes to convincing others, no matter what side of the aisle they're on. I understand why you're afraid - I really have no skin in this game and I'm afraid - I want the best for you, I want an end to the wars and violence and suffering all over the world - Clinton scares the living * out of me with that. It's hard, I know.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)There is almost no convincing a repuke senate. We fist have to take control of the house and the senate. Liberal voter turn out is too low for that to happen. Hillary is better than all the others. She doesn't scare me. I am grateful for Bernie moving our peeps more to the left but I don't have confidence in him PRODUCING change.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)But I've read so many other articles here that have said the complete opposite, and I just believe that he's an honest man who will fight for what he knows is right. He's also very, very smart and has many experts who agree with him on his health-care and college plans, on the need for prison reform, increasing minimum wage, money in politics, Wall St. deregulation, war, etc. His visions all make sense, will help millions of people live lives with dignity, and are doable - Clinton, on the other hand believes in not even trying - she's fine with the status quo. Doing very well with it, actually.
cali
(114,904 posts)couldn't be more transparent. Do try for a little subtlety with your next attack.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)As do a few of the other responses on this thread. It's a nasty stereotype and I'm pretty loathe to go there but the OP has now confessed she's voting for HRC anyway. Her answers were easily discovered with a simple google search.
Why go here with this?
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Being Jewish as nothing to do with anything and I do NOT discriminate against anyone EVER! Shame on you!!
Arazi
(6,829 posts)these questions were easily answered via a simple Google search
It's a thinly veiled smear and you're rightly getting called on it
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)If I didn't prefer to let people expose themselves in public, I'd alert your post myself.
As for Bernie, so he took a few decades to "find" himself. That is just another kind of diversity.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)He's calling a poster out on a faux question (OP probably knew Bernie's history before starting this thread) and faux outrage.
This thread is what should have been alerted on.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)spend a couple hours eating bonbons, then run around the White House lawn flying a kite all afternoon. Maybe in the evening chill with the kardashians on tv. Finish off the night alternating between using a hula hoop and jumping on a pogo stick.
(What the hell. Is this really a concern? Is this even a conversation we're really having on DU?)
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)gotten involved in issues most people won't waste their time on, like civil rights, which is far more important to him than making money.
But we need to impugn him because he was young once and not working a high paying job like a good republican would do? Well he actually did take on the responsibility of helping to raise his son, which irresponsible young fathers don't...they tend to abdicate care to the mother.
And there is another President, whom most Hillary supporters highly praise now, although they all didn't when he was running against Hill in 2008...and guess what? He was young once too, and he did drugs and didn't pay attention to his education.
"Barack fooled around in high school," the first lady said on the BET talk-show "The Real" during a session focused on higher education.
"He didn't take school seriously in high school. He barely got his work done. He was a bum! And it took him a second. He had to grow up a little bit," she said.
Michelle Obama said her husband didn't become serious about his education until he transferred to Columbia University during his second year of college.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/26/politics/first-lady-michelle-obama-barack-bum/
But he has turned out to be a pretty phenomenal President, even if he's more moderate than what I was hoping for.
So please stop with this orchestrated smear on Bernie for being young once. It has nothing at all to do with his qualifications for POTUS now.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Posts in this thread are hidden merely for saying things about Bernie that are mild compared to some of the same posters' accusation of Hillary.
This is where the Republicans would find some really good material (as they see it) were it possible Bernie got the nomination.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)She has survived 20 years of right wing crap. People are yawning now when they see "emails" but Bernie's stuff would be new and different.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Yawn.. like we haven't been through that issue a thousand times.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)I wonder if this deficiency in self educational abilities might account for the vast lag Clinton and her supporters have demonstrated toward marriage equality and other areas of social progress? Unable to figure out simple things, they depend on gossip and rumor to patch together a worldview?
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Believe it or not Trump has a lot of LGBT support. Though I have no idea why.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)apparently don't know how to use Google or crack a book to get the information you want indicates that such inadequacies may have prevented you and your cohort from learning the facts about LGBT people and our rights. Confused, misinformed people working from assumptions and rumors and stuff they heard on the streets instead of educating themselves as others do when others wish to know a simple fact.
I'm sorry but the inability to seek out information is going to cause persons to cling to bigotry, bias, superstition and myth out of fear.
Trump does not have a lot of LGBT support, this thread is not about Trump and not about who LGBT support. My comment is about you, your candidate, her cohort and this 'We can't find the basic facts about things' routine you all pull when not claiming to speak for God Almighty on the rights of other people.
Your question, not honest at all, disingenuous bait because you could look up the facts. So your candidate is not well trusted, this tactic is not going to help. Claiming it is an honest question when you could have just looked it up using the same device you used to claim ignorance is not honest.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I wish we never would have had to have this conversation. I wish gay couples could have lived their lives with the same rights as anyone else always. It wasn't the case and it took far too long to get where we are and we're still not where I would like us to be. IN THOSE times 99% of politicians were against marriage equality. The Clinton's were the first to receive pressure on this issue before that it was a dormant issue. Clinton signed DOMA reluctantly there was a VETO proof majority. Obama was the 1st president to make significant progress for LGBT couples.
MuseRider
(34,112 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)It has bios on lots of famous people. Including Bernie.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Oh no, Sorry. I was thinking of someone else.
My Bad
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)And, yes, was among the "working poor" and found that even more overrated.
And, I was frequently, "dead broke" as in "hungry, no food" broke. Unlike a certain candidate who brags about being "dead broke".
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)Anyway, whatever Bernie did, Hillary still stands for war and fracking and sending little kids back to get killed, or saying no to signing an agreement to not use cluster bombs, knowing kids pick them up - and then there is the TPP and Wall Street.
Nothing Bernie did or did not do overrides those things she stands for - which I hate. I could not, because I have a conscience, support Hillary.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)At times I was ashamed to be American. I am a realist and I just do not believe Bernie will get any of his ideas passed. He may even turn power over to repukes in his first term and they are worse than Hillary.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)What kind of fucked-up fantasy is that?
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I meant to say.. He very well could be a 1 term president resulting in repukes taking over. Not all Americans are ready for a socialist.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)and you wonder why people don't take these seriously anymore
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)as do more than a few of the other responses from HRC supporters
arcane1
(38,613 posts)It's crazy.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)so why go here with this line of attack?
I can only see one answer and it's not pretty
arcane1
(38,613 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)You don't know me.
dr60omg
(283 posts)You do not seem to understand the Clintons cannot get their ideas passed because they are despised a lot of the dysfunction started with them. Having said that ... Sanders never said I he said we (which is Clinton's newest appropriation and is kind of funny). He has gotten a lot done. Have you ever read about the history of Burlington Vermont and the transformation of the city? Did you realize the huge margin he won his senate seat by? Do you also know he was named the most trusted member of the Senate?
Barring all of that he has said WE must work and apply citizen pressure to our representatives and apply pressure and his call for a political revolution has to do with if they will not respond then we run people against those who are not responsive ... There are already down ballot Sanders people running for office ... and there will be more ...
It is a lesson in trying to revitalize a representative democracy over an oligarchy ... of course you recognize and we all recognize that the Congress cannot be taken back until 2020 when there is a new census
eridani
(51,907 posts)She is not brining in any new voters to the party. Sanders is, and there is a good chance he can motivate them to stay involved after the election.
raging moderate
(4,307 posts)It wasn't really a good time for people born into poverty. It didn't matter if you had a work ethic or were willing to work long irregular hours. I knew many people who struggled to find decent work. People tried many different things even though they had college degrees. If they weren't good at it, they kept hoping they would get good at it eventually if they kept trying. Employers could fire you for almost any reason, and sometimes they did so because they had a relative they wanted to employ. It wasn't all that different from how it is today, unless your family already had some way to help you find a job. Certain kids with good clothes and even features were labeled "clean-cut" and given preferential treatment. Some of us became hippies because those were the only people who weren't jeering at us.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)and inflating my ignore list.
cali
(114,904 posts)Contemptible
togetherforever
(71 posts)Some of the posters in this thread are truly nasty people.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)The google can be a stubborn creature, refusing to yield up its treasure trove of answers.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Before moving to Vermont full-time in 1968, Bernie worked as an aide at a psychiatric hospital in New York, taught low-income preschoolers through Head Start, and helped register people for nutrition assistance programs.
http://feelthebern.org/who-is-bernie-sanders/
valerief
(53,235 posts)JI7
(89,260 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)VEEE JUST KNOW IT!
kath
(10,565 posts)cascadiance
(19,537 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and it is not a nice whiff...
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)it's called a FUCKING JOKE
Bucky
(54,041 posts)You wanna talk work ethic?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I think it's the lobster.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)and he made educational videos for schools if I recall correctly.
merrily
(45,251 posts)"Honest question for Bernie supporters," I start laughing.
You just know it's going to be anything but.
Ok. We know Bernie survived, so he had food and probably shelter. He must have either stolen until he was elected Mayor or begged, perhaps with an element of miming or juggling. .
Oh and, got google?
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)works sake is good.
Response to fun n serious (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Orsino
(37,428 posts)By all means, let's compare and contrast our candidates on this subject.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)What kind of work ethic is that?
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Oh, wait...
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)I'm going to be bookmarking these threads for future enjoyment. It's the gift that keeps giving (no, not socialism ) !
dchill
(38,515 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)monicaangela
(1,508 posts)After finishing college in 1964 with a degree in political science, Sanders lived on a kibbutz in Israel for several months before settling in Vermont. He worked a number of jobs, including filmmaker and freelance writer, psychiatric aide, and teaching low-income children through Head Start, while his interest in politics grew.