Mentioning her speech history is not an attack. Mentioning donors who get favors is not an attack. Mentioning her various positions over the years is not an attack.

As soon as the Kennedy assassination comes up as tied to her, yes, then you'll have an attack.

do you have anything connecting her to assassination? That is besides the times she's linked Obama to assassination.

Poppy was CIA... connect the dots

?

Super Tuesday is only a week away

It's like reading any RW site. Same attacks, different website.




Although, after a while, they become funny because they are so preposterous.

Usually however. .....the majority of the time these so called "attacks" against HRC are based on HRC's own actions.

THE EXPLOSIVE STORY:
A second opinion on the Kennedy crash

This ended the speculation that JFK Jr. might run for the U.S. Senate seat against Hillary Clinton in New York or against Al Gore, Jr. for the Presidency of the United States in the forthcoming Democratic Primary. Rumor had it that he was going to announce on August 1. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the Kennedy killing was murder in the first degree?


http://www.netowne.com/conspiracy/konformist/kennedy.htm

or to quote Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men: [Some people] can't handle the truth!

HRC talks ad nauseum about her record. Well, guess what? It's out there in all its infamous glory on the internet... the lies, the changed positions (with the political wind), the testiness when her entitlement is challenged and the nastiness of her primary campaigns in 2008 and now.

The truth hurts because your candidate is seriously flawed and untrustworthy.

That would be ridiculous, and wrong.

her for a right-wing coup in Honduras last night. HAHAHAHA That was the funniest thing I've seen in a while.

Basically anything good that happened under her watch was someone else's doing, anything bad, well, u get it