Martha Raddatz’s Approach Should Be The Standard For Future Debate Moderators

Jim Lehrer tried to defend his performance moderating last week’s presidential debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney by saying he wanted to “facilitate direct, extended exchanges between the candidates about issues of substance” and he wanted to make sure he was “stay[ing] out of the way of the flow.” But what tonight’s debate definitively proved is that a good exchange of ideas does not require the moderator to stay above the fray. Martha Raddatz not only asked better questions of the two candidates, but she asserted enough control so that the candidates did not go too far over their allotted time.

Raddatz used her first question to grill Biden on whether the administration’s response to Libya was a “massive intelligence failure.” A number of times she told the candidates to be “specific.” Remember Lehrer asking them innumerable variations of the same “what’s the difference between you on this issue” question? Raddatz not only told the candidates to be specific, but she asked specific questions, like the following:

To Joe Biden: “What were you first told about the attack? Why — why were people talking about protests? When people in the consulate first saw armed men attacking with guns, there were no protesters. Why did that go on?”

To Paul Ryan: “What is your specific plan for seniors who really can’t afford to make up the difference in the value of what you call a premium support plan and others call a voucher?”

-snip-

Full article here: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/martha-raddatzs-approach-should-be-the-standard-for-future-debate-moderators/