answer for speeches they made on Wall Street or were accused of some kind of wrong doing because they were paid to speak.
I guess this is a new standard reserved for Hillary Clinton or is it just women.

Fortunately there's only one of them that's running.

anyone else. Neither one of them belonged to the Socialist Labor Party.

the USSR.

SO so scary. It's sorta like the new, I, proved Terra, Terra! TERRA!

The greater issue is her taking so much money for so many years and then claiming to be completely uninfluenced by it. We know what she said to us, what did she say to them?
Just full disclosure.

Her exploitation of the cash strapped higher educational system is a question for later.

Taking six figure sums from any organization for one speech is just another form of legal bribery IMHO. Especially when you're a "public servant" with political ambitions ahead.

Yeah, she's a privileged powerful politician, and she used that to her own advantage to the max, which shows me where her priorities lie.

The reason the Wall St. speeches get more play is that they have a ton of control on Capitol Hill and in our economy compared to any other legal bribes Clinton took.

Hillary really is in the pocket of the status quo, and her policies and actions prove it.

Because they're not in the position to destroy the economy again unless they are sufficiently regulated?

Student loan debt is how much now?

There is this tho


http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/10/elizabeth-warren-on-how-clinton-backed-student-loan-and-mortgage-debt-slavery-with-bankruptcy-reform.html

$200million for the Clintons, cashing in on their public service. I consider it to be sleazy, greedy, and corrupt.

I miss Harry Truman, and his post-presidency ethics.

Truman lived in an ordinary house in Missouri after his presidency, and wouldn't take any money from corporate interests because he knew they didn't want him, but were trying to buy the power of the presidency. Truman wouldn't sell it. The Clintons were happy to be bought.

This is why my Dad, a lifelong moderate Republican who is disgusted by Trump, won't vote for Clinton. If it's Trump vs. Clinton, he'll vote for a 3rd party.

She doesn't care if who she milks for her unconscionable speaking fees!

Not even public universities are immune to her all-consuming greed.

It's Hillarious that you would try to spin this as pro-Hillary. The whole pay-to-play system that she and Bill have profited insanely from is utterly corrupt, and this is the most egregious evidence yet of that undeniable FACT.

only "help students find a way to pay" and 'stop the rise in cost.'

Dems are vulnerable on this point as the financial industry is a big contributor. Problem? Not when you consider the alternatives like Big Oil, KBR, and the rest of the global warmers.

why not advocate for tuition free universities?