Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:49 AM Mar 2016

Hillary Backs New Allied War in Libya

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/35474-focus-hillary-backs-new-allied-war-in-libya

“You know, the United States was in Korea, and still is, for many years,” she explained, channeling a favorite argument of Republican senator John McCain. “We are still in Germany. We are still in Japan. We have a presence in a lot of places in the world that started out as a result of conflict. And if you think about South Korea, there were coups, there were assassinations, there was a lot of problems for the Koreans to build their economy, to create their democracy.”

Remembering myriad details of her much-vaunted foreign policy experience, Hillary appears never to have asked why intervening in the former colonies of North Africa and the Middle East so consistently fails. The best answer I can find comes in Delphic fashion from oft-quoted Washington cynics. In Iraq, they tell us, the United States intervened and occupied – and things went to hell. In Libya, the United States intervened but did not occupy – and things went to hell. And in Syria, the United States neither intervened nor occupied – and things still went to hell.

In other words, the problem is not in in how we intervened, but that we intervened. This puts Hillary on the wrong side of history, at least as seen by large numbers of people in the region’s former European colonies. The anti-colonial sentiment appears less fervent in sub-Saharan Africa, where US Special Forces are often seen working closely with their French counterparts. But no one doubts that al-Qaeda and Daesh-affiliated groups gain strength by being the only groups truly willing to fight against a return of Western colonialism. Having failed to learn these lessons, Hillary remains the have-gun, will-travel paladin of liberal imperialism.

The new war in Libya, which she now supports, seems largely invisible to American media. But, it became headline news here in France on Thursday, when Le Monde broke through official secrecy and revealed that French special forces and clandestine agents were operating in Libya in close cooperation with their Americans and British allies.

The French Minister of Defense was furious and launched a secret investigation into who leaked the secret information to Le Monde. My guess is that the major leaks came from within the French military, where many officers feel over-extended by their current interventions in Syria and Africa.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Backs New Allied War in Libya (Original Post) eridani Mar 2016 OP
It's amazing how many support endless wars jfern Mar 2016 #1
Actually, she is pretty sane compared to the Repubs eridani Mar 2016 #2
She's more of a hawk than Trump jfern Mar 2016 #3
time to buy defense stocks. Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #4
A crux issue: The mattet of Empire The Traveler Mar 2016 #5
once stupid, always stupid, apparently greymouse Mar 2016 #6
EHM Depaysement Mar 2016 #7
War is a good business... Raster Mar 2016 #9
You bet Depaysement Mar 2016 #11
Her mentor, Kissinger, must be so proud. BeanMusical Mar 2016 #8
In the OP link, the following FOCUS comment is something I agree with: DhhD Mar 2016 #10
oh, god DAMNIT. VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #12
Beware of the military industrial complex NWCorona Mar 2016 #13

jfern

(5,204 posts)
1. It's amazing how many support endless wars
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:53 AM
Mar 2016

as long as the President is a Democrat.

Hillary scares me. And I'm not alone. The Democratic party deserves to lose if they nominate this insane warmonger.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
2. Actually, she is pretty sane compared to the Repubs
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:56 AM
Mar 2016

Not that this makes the situation any better.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
4. time to buy defense stocks.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:59 AM
Mar 2016

I mean, fuck it. If the writing is on the wall, might as well ride the elevator up, amirite?





sort of

 

The Traveler

(5,632 posts)
5. A crux issue: The mattet of Empire
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:02 AM
Mar 2016

Or "benign hegemony" or whatever we're calling it these days. You're either for it ot against it. I'm against it. And if you are for it, I can't support you.

Trav

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
7. EHM
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:46 AM
Mar 2016

They are no longer enough. War is necessary.

There's money to be made boys and girls. No war, no money.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
9. War is a good business...
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:25 AM
Mar 2016
...invest your child today.*

-----------
*only a certain income level - or lack of it, need apply. The rest of you fine, young, rich, white kids continue on with your lives.

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
10. In the OP link, the following FOCUS comment is something I agree with:
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:35 AM
Mar 2016

+9 # Douglas Jack 2016-02-29 17:45
Steve Weissman, Good article but Hillary & US militarism Is more than a short term 'political' issue.
AFRICA's RICHEST NATION
Hillary Clinton, "We came, we saw, he died!" for her financing, arming & murder of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi over Libya's universal-medic are (is Bernie next?), education, employment, housing & Africa's highest standard of living. Libya was #1 financier of development-aid & investor in Africa's essential service infrastructure. Hillary's slave to world trillionaire OLIGARCHs who couldn't stomach Muammar's (Jewish mother) implementation of the gold-based African Dinar for all oil & commodity trading.

HIllary's record of approving CARPET-BOMBING of no-Afghani-hija ckers-Afghanist an, no-weapons-of-m ass-destruction -Iraq & her determinative role as Secretary of State of Libya. Hillary's State-departmen t operatives finance, arm & supply foreign mercenaries in Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt etc. because she worships oligarch wealth & Israel 1st.

THE DEEP STATE
Greater-Israel's Oded-Yinon-Plan OYP & its US daughters Project-for-a-N ew-American-Cen tury PNAC & New-World-Order NWO advanced by Netanyahu (supported by Hillary) for these destabilization , arming of our-perceived-e nemy's-enemy, bombing campaigns are clearly scheduled. General Westley Clarke describes being informed of the US role in OYP's taking out 7 countries. http://www.globalresearch.ca/we-re-going-to-take-out-7-countries-in-5-years-iraq-syria-lebanon-libya-somalia-sudan-iran/5166

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
13. Beware of the military industrial complex
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 11:32 AM
Mar 2016

Hillary is bought and paid for who also loves quoting Republicans when she gets hawkish.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Backs New Allied ...