Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Mitt Romney’s Lies and a Startling Truth" by David Sirota at In These Times
Mitt Romneys Lies and a Startling Truthby David Sirota at In These Times
http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/14012/a_gop_shift_on_taxes
"SNIP...............................................
That circle began more than a quarter century ago, when, in the midst of his push to raise taxes, President Ronald Reagan railed on unproductive tax loopholes that allow some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share and criticized a system that made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was paying ten percent of his salary.
Unfortunately, since then, the GOP reoriented itself around a destructive anti-tax theology. In a matter of a few decades, the national debt predictably exploded as the party's orthodoxy went from read my lips, no new taxes (George H.W. Bush) to if you raise taxes on these so-called rich, you're really raising taxes on the job creators (George W. Bush) to recent years' pervasive Republican rhetoric about so-called makers and takers. Yet now, suddenly, Romney is closing the rhetorical loop, repeatedly claiming at the first presidential debate that he will refuse to support any new tax cuts for the wealthy.
Of course, based on his proposal's granular details, a President Romney will almost certainly try to cut taxes for his fellow 1%-ers. Thus, it's easy to dismiss his debate statements as just unimportant campaign rhetoric representing nothing more than political expediency. But, then, Romney's lying actually underscores the potentially deeper significance of this moment. It shows even some leaders of the trickle-down party recognize that voter hostility to plutocratic tax proposals has grown (rightly) intenseso intense, in fact, that GOP leaders know their party must try to publicly disown the trickle-down image, to the point of lying about their true agenda. And here's the thing: eventually, such brand reinvention efforts often sow the seeds of more genuine changes in policy positions.
None of this means Romney is some brave hero. It merely means he is a politician who sees an America that finally recognizes how much its tax system is skewed toward the wealthy. In such a country, expedience is thankfully no longer synonymous with anti-tax demagoguery. It is, instead, congruent with a more rational rhetorical posture on tax fairness.
................................................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1120 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Mitt Romney’s Lies and a Startling Truth" by David Sirota at In These Times (Original Post)
applegrove
Oct 2012
OP
applegrove
(118,677 posts)1. I don't think that this "the rich will not pay less taxes" is more than just
political expediency right now. But i thought it was an interesting take on how America has changed, thanks to Obama, thanks to the Clintons, thanks to Occupy.
aquart
(69,014 posts)2. ROMNEY sees an America whose tax system is skewed toward the wealthy? ROMNEY?
Uh, no.