Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:06 PM Mar 2016

Jane Sanders and my 29 year old undecided Daughter.

I live in Portland OR, so many of my daughters peers are voting for Bernie, she was undecided. I spoke to her by phone today and she told me if the primaries make it to Oregon she will vote for Hillary. The game changer for her was watching Jane Sanders on Chris Hayes disrespect Ms. Clinton by not referring to her by name. Not SOS, not First Lady, not even just Hillary but instead she referred to her as " that woman." She also insinuated the South didn't matter. My daughter was leaning Bernie until the extreme anger of his supporters made her take another look at look at Hillary. Jane Sander's interview was the straw that broke the camels back. Why am I telling you this? Because the behavior of his supporters and people close to him do matter. Off Topic.. I have 3 kids ages 29, 23, and 12. Big ages differences I know. My 12 year old is for Bernie but can't vote. My 23 year old favors Trump. ( probably just to piss me off) Hubby and I agree on Hillary

anyway, there you have it. My Portland family.

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jane Sanders and my 29 year old undecided Daughter. (Original Post) fun n serious Mar 2016 OP
What happened to voting on issues? Or, if you are going to vote flor-de-jasmim Mar 2016 #1
Issues are not very different, she said.. nt fun n serious Mar 2016 #3
I understand completely! djean111 Mar 2016 #2
There you go. See... It matters. nt fun n serious Mar 2016 #4
It absolutely does. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #9
I don't believe you. JRLeft Mar 2016 #5
Truth hurts sometimes and people go into denial mode. nt fun n serious Mar 2016 #6
I think you're seeking attention. JRLeft Mar 2016 #7
Lol. That's what I think about... fun n serious Mar 2016 #10
You know damn well you've supported Hillary the entire time. JRLeft Mar 2016 #18
I have supported Hillary the entire time, YES. fun n serious Mar 2016 #27
Maybe you're telling the truth, I doubt it but I could be wrong won't be the first time. JRLeft Mar 2016 #35
Maybe if I'm lucky, I'll run into her here in Portland... Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #8
You can try, why not. nt fun n serious Mar 2016 #12
That interview was awful. She was so dismissive not only of hillary, but also dissed red states lunamagica Mar 2016 #11
She was rude and people noticed. fun n serious Mar 2016 #14
Having been born and raised in a red state... actslikeacarrot Mar 2016 #38
Thew defense is for the good Democrats in those states who made the effor to vote and now are being lunamagica Mar 2016 #39
I call bullshit on your story. ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #13
What do you think of Jane's behavior? fun n serious Mar 2016 #15
Sometimes the worst surrogates are people closest to a candidate KingFlorez Mar 2016 #16
Oops. She never said "that woman" Luminous Animal Mar 2016 #17
I don't remember exactly, but she never mentioned her name lunamagica Mar 2016 #19
….. Luminous Animal Mar 2016 #21
OK, I concede that she called her name. But watch the interview if you haven't lunamagica Mar 2016 #24
Yes. So much so no one noticed she did call her by name they just noticed the " cringe" fun n serious Mar 2016 #45
The woman? something like that Yes she did. nt fun n serious Mar 2016 #29
To the transcript! AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #20
The facts don't jibe with the OP for some reason. Octafish Mar 2016 #22
The OP is anecdotal fiction for effect measured by k&r's, but facts are pesky things. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #25
Facts are always on our side. Thanks Atomic Kitten. retrowire Mar 2016 #26
THE WOMAN. She did NOT address her her by name or with respect, Stop spinning nt fun n serious Mar 2016 #30
Hillary is... retrowire Mar 2016 #37
The OP is simply irresistible. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #31
K&R mcar Mar 2016 #23
Well my 26 yo daughter & all her friends are voting for Bernie so nanny nanny boo boo jillan Mar 2016 #28
Juvenile fun n serious Mar 2016 #34
I was listenng but when Ms Sanders dissed the voters in Southern states I put it on mute. No riversedge Mar 2016 #32
Yes, they can spin all they want but Jane was disrespectful. fun n serious Mar 2016 #33
So the original poster was not truthful, did not check the transcript and came here to ... slipslidingaway Mar 2016 #36
Oh, so you're the alerter? PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #40
What was wrong with what I said. :( fun n serious Mar 2016 #43
Nothing. It was 2-5 to leave. PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #44
I see a lot of factually incorrect posts here. Lol nt. TY fun n serious Mar 2016 #46
Wrong! I never alerted on even one post since 2004, but to come here repeating lies without ... slipslidingaway Mar 2016 #47
I just served on a jury for this post. This place is cray cray PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #41
I did not have sexual relations with THAT WOMAN DefenseLawyer Mar 2016 #42

flor-de-jasmim

(2,125 posts)
1. What happened to voting on issues? Or, if you are going to vote
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:10 PM
Mar 2016

On personalities, at least base your vote on the candidates" personalities. Deciding to vote or not vote based on the supporters does not seem a strong voting strategy. That's what I'd say to my daughter.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
2. I understand completely!
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:11 PM
Mar 2016
Because the behavior of his supporters and people close to him do matter

Even if I did not hate pretty much everything Hillary actually stands for (which is really how a thinking person decides who to support) the sheer nastiness of her supporters has convinced me that supporting Hillary is a club I would not want to join. And Bill just sort of reinforces that feeling. Funny, isn't it - how a spouse can influence things - I sure don't want to see more scandal in the White House.
 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
10. Lol. That's what I think about...
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:29 PM
Mar 2016

Post after post here on DU about how they refuse to vote for Hillary. Thread after thread.. Repeated over and over. Or over the top nasty OP's like this one..

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027664379

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
35. Maybe you're telling the truth, I doubt it but I could be wrong won't be the first time.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 08:09 PM
Mar 2016

I used to believe the Clinton's were progressive, they're corporacrats.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
11. That interview was awful. She was so dismissive not only of hillary, but also dissed red states
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:31 PM
Mar 2016

and went there and said that those who didn't support Sanders were "low-information voters".

She looked entitled, arrogant and condescending, so much so that Hayes (who was no doubt hoping she'd make a great case for Sanders), had to stop her insulting the populations of red states and cut the interview short.

She was so awful that her husband's supporters on DU all but ignored the interview.

Your daughter is smart!

actslikeacarrot

(464 posts)
38. Having been born and raised in a red state...
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 08:25 PM
Mar 2016

...and still living in another red state I'm currently baffled about all the defense of said red states. Dissing red states (particularly the southern states) is damn near a hobby on DU. When none of these states go for Clinton in the GE I wonder if it will be open season again? Maybe a thread on wondering if we could cut the south loose? Maybe just Texas?

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
39. Thew defense is for the good Democrats in those states who made the effor to vote and now are being
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 08:34 PM
Mar 2016

dissed

 

ThePhilosopher04

(1,732 posts)
13. I call bullshit on your story.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:31 PM
Mar 2016

Anybody who claims that as a reason not to vote for Bernie was not voting for him anyway.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
15. What do you think of Jane's behavior?
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:34 PM
Mar 2016

People are just getting to know Bernie. When they see that it's goes to part of what they learn about him..

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
21. …..
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:45 PM
Mar 2016

Hayes: —the mathematical path forward for the Sanders campaign, facing now this banked deficit of 200 allocated delegates, and the fact that it's proportional all the way through?

Sanders: Well, we knew the early maps would be harder for us, uh, for several reasons. First that the people across the country might not be as familiar with Bernie as they are, uh, with the woman that has been in three presidential campaigns—two of her husband's and her own already. Um, so she's quite well-known throughout the world, and we needed to introduce Bernie. Um, however, uh, the early states have turned out to be at least as good as what we had hoped. Um, as you say, it's proportional, so, in Massachusetts, we had forty-nine percent of the vote. The delegate—the delegate count is going to be just about equal. In Vermont, where they know him the best, he got a shutout. Uh, he will get a hundred percent of the delegates, because, uh, Secretary Clinton didn't meet the—the fifteen percent threshold to get any delegates from our state. Um, in terms of the states that we just had, with, um, Super Tuesday, it seems—I think there are two important things to point out: Most of the states that, uh, Secretary Clinton won had low voter turnouts. Most of the states that Bernie won had high voter turnouts. We know, when we have a high voter turnout, Bernie does better, because the more people that participate in the process, they more they, uh— His ideas are carried out. Uh, the second is that most of the states—just, you know, not all of them—but most of the states are historically red states and are not likely to carry the day in the general election. Most of the states that Bernie has won are mostly blue states or battleground states. And he's won them handily. I think it was, um, ten percent in Oklahoma, nineteen percent in Minnesota, twenty some odd percent, ah, in Oklahoma, so—

Hayes: Well, let me stop you right there.

Sanders: —I think we're looking good.

Hayes: Let me stop you right there. There's two things, talking about this from a red state, blue state— I mean, that does seem to me a little, um, a little bit of misdirection, insofar as general election electorates are different, right? And also, it also seems a little dismissive of, say, the good folks in Alabama, right? I mean, it's not Alabaman Democrats'—

Sanders: Oh no, yeah.

Hayes: It's not Alabaman Democrats' fault that they don't have a majority of voters in Alabama! [chuckles] They can't do anything about that, except, you know, make more Democrats. Um, and, and that—that links up to a deeper issue here, right? Which is there is a stark demographic divide happening in the states that Clinton is winning and the states Sanders is winning. Exit polling showing Bernie Sanders losing black voters by eighty-five to fourteen; losing in those states with very high percentages of black voters across the South. I mean, it just seems impossible to me for someone to win the Democratic nomination in the age of the Obama coalition who is losing by those margins among black voters.

Sanders: Well, the age of the Obama coalition was two thousand eight. This is two thousand sixteen. And we'll see either the Sanders coalition, or the Clinton coalition. Uh, I think that it's— You're absolutely right; we need to reach the, uh, the African American voter better. As I said, they're not that familiar with them—with Bernie. What we've done is, um, try to reach the working class voter, uh, the middle class voter, and not go, uh, not divide and, and, and reach out to individual sectors of the community. The Latino community, the African American community, the women, the men, the—the young. Um, but we have to do a better job on that. Um, and we know that, and we are going forward. I think if you look at the, uh, election results of yesterday, you'll see that we were—we had increased, uh, significantly with the Latino vote. Um, and in terms of the wide discrepancy, the same discrepancy holds true with Bernie against Clinton in terms of anybody under 30, no matter what race, what ethnicity—

Hayes: Yeah, there's a huge disparity.

Sanders: —they are. Yes.

Hayes: All right. Jane Sanders, from Burlington, Vermont. Thank you very much. I appreciate it.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
24. OK, I concede that she called her name. But watch the interview if you haven't
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:52 PM
Mar 2016

watch her attitude. Watch How Hayes intervenes and cuts her off.

There's a reason why no one started a thread on how awesome she was...because the whole thing was cringe-worry

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
20. To the transcript!
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:43 PM
Mar 2016
My count: One "the woman ..." (not THAT woman), two "Secretary Clinton"s, and one "Clinton"

TRANSCRIPT

Hayes: —Clinton's lead, which is now nearly two hundred allocated delegates more than Sanders, will become more difficult for Sanders to overcome, because of that proportional allocation. That's a lesson Clinton learned in her two thousand eight race against Barack Obama. Joining me now, spouse of two thousand sixteen presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, Jane Sanders. Ms. Sanders, it's wonderful to have you. Um, what is your feeling about—

Sanders: It's nice to be here, Chris.

Hayes: —the mathematical path forward for the Sanders campaign, facing now this banked deficit of 200 allocated delegates, and the fact that it's proportional all the way through?

Sanders: Well, we knew the early maps would be harder for us, uh, for several reasons. First that the people across the country might not be as familiar with Bernie as they are, uh, with the woman that has been in three presidential campaigns—two of her husband's and her own already. Um, so she's quite well-known throughout the world, and we needed to introduce Bernie. Um, however, uh, the early states have turned out to be at least as good as what we had hoped. Um, as you say, it's proportional, so, in Massachusetts, we had forty-nine percent of the vote. The delegate—the delegate count is going to be just about equal. In Vermont, where they know him the best, he got a shutout. Uh, he will get a hundred percent of the delegates, because, uh, Secretary Clinton didn't meet the—the fifteen percent threshold to get any delegates from our state. Um, in terms of the states that we just had, with, um, Super Tuesday, it seems—I think there are two important things to point out: Most of the states that, uh, Secretary Clinton won had low voter turnouts. Most of the states that Bernie won had high voter turnouts. We know, when we have a high voter turnout, Bernie does better, because the more people that participate in the process, they more they, uh— His ideas are carried out. Uh, the second is that most of the states—just, you know, not all of them—but most of the states are historically red states and are not likely to carry the day in the general election. Most of the states that Bernie has won are mostly blue states or battleground states. And he's won them handily. I think it was, um, ten percent in Oklahoma, nineteen percent in Minnesota, twenty some odd percent, ah, in Oklahoma, so—

Hayes: Well, let me stop you right there.

Sanders: —I think we're looking good.

Hayes: Let me stop you right there. There's two things, talking about this from a red state, blue state— I mean, that does seem to me a little, um, a little bit of misdirection, insofar as general election electorates are different, right? And also, it also seems a little dismissive of, say, the good folks in Alabama, right? I mean, it's not Alabaman Democrats'—

Sanders: Oh no, yeah.

Hayes: It's not Alabaman Democrats' fault that they don't have a majority of voters in Alabama! [chuckles] They can't do anything about that, except, you know, make more Democrats. Um, and, and that—that links up to a deeper issue here, right? Which is there is a stark demographic divide happening in the states that Clinton is winning and the states Sanders is winning. Exit polling showing Bernie Sanders losing black voters by eighty-five to fourteen; losing in those states with very high percentages of black voters across the South. I mean, it just seems impossible to me for someone to win the Democratic nomination in the age of the Obama coalition who is losing by those margins among black voters.

Sanders: Well, the age of the Obama coalition was two thousand eight. This is two thousand sixteen. And we'll see either the Sanders coalition, or the Clinton coalition. Uh, I think that it's— You're absolutely right; we need to reach the, uh, the African American voter better. As I said, they're not that familiar with them—with Bernie. What we've done is, um, try to reach the working class voter, uh, the middle class voter, and not go, uh, not divide and, and, and reach out to individual sectors of the community. The Latino community, the African American community, the women, the men, the—the young. Um, but we have to do a better job on that. Um, and we know that, and we are going forward. I think if you look at the, uh, election results of yesterday, you'll see that we were—we had increased, uh, significantly with the Latino vote. Um, and in terms of the wide discrepancy, the same discrepancy holds true with Bernie against Clinton in terms of anybody under 30, no matter what race, what ethnicity—

Hayes: Yeah, there's a huge disparity.

Sanders: —they are. Yes.

Hayes: All right. Jane Sanders, from Burlington, Vermont. Thank you very much. I appreciate it.




retrowire

(10,345 posts)
26. Facts are always on our side. Thanks Atomic Kitten.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 07:59 PM
Mar 2016

Now, let's watch all the Hillary Supporters skim past this and KnR to their hearts delight!

Oh, look! There's one now! XD

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
37. Hillary is...
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 08:17 PM
Mar 2016
The woman who ran in the primaries in 2008.

Was that derogatory? No. It was a factual statement. If someone were to ask me, who Hillary Clinton was, that would be an acceptable answer.

You, have biased goggles on and want to hear what you thought you heard. This is clearly about perception.

The FACT, is that Jane did in FACT refer to her in more official terms throughout her speaking about her. So... Seriously, it's NOT a big deal.

Should you continue to paint it as a big deal though, it is YOU who are doing the spin.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
28. Well my 26 yo daughter & all her friends are voting for Bernie so nanny nanny boo boo
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 08:02 PM
Mar 2016

Things are getting a bit juvenile around here..... just sayin'

riversedge

(70,242 posts)
32. I was listenng but when Ms Sanders dissed the voters in Southern states I put it on mute. No
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 08:06 PM
Mar 2016

need for that at all.

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
36. So the original poster was not truthful, did not check the transcript and came here to ...
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 08:17 PM
Mar 2016

repeat the lie of "that woman."









PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
44. Nothing. It was 2-5 to leave.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 09:06 PM
Mar 2016

The alert was basically what the poster above said... "it's factually incorrect".

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
47. Wrong! I never alerted on even one post since 2004, but to come here repeating lies without ...
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 09:16 PM
Mar 2016

even checking the transcripts should be called to attention.



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Jane Sanders and my 29 ye...