Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:44 PM Mar 2016

Why did Clinton Need A Private Server? (Why can't we just ignore this until the general election?)

Last edited Mon Mar 7, 2016, 05:23 PM - Edit history (1)

Hillary Clinton is the only Secretary of State to delete 31,830 emails, from her own private server and without government oversight.

As the only Secretary of State never to use an @state.gov email address, Hillary Clinton is also the only Secretary of State to use a private server exclusively. As Yahoo states, "Clinton acknowledged in March that she exclusively used a private email account and private server from 2009 to 2013 while secretary of state, opting against a government account despite official recommendations."

MORE TO READ AT THE LINK.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/why-did-hillary-clinton-need-a-private-server-the-answer-makes-bernie-sanders-president_b_9397304.html

UPDATE: Here is the system Colin Powell used.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/423688/colin-powell-hillary-clinton-email

67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why did Clinton Need A Private Server? (Why can't we just ignore this until the general election?) (Original Post) Skwmom Mar 2016 OP
She's special. n/t Wilms Mar 2016 #1
H A Goodman. Paul supporter and Ratfucker extrodinaire. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #2
What FACTS do you dispute? n/t Skwmom Mar 2016 #4
Clearly I have entered two facts into argument. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #5
So far the best defense fredamae Mar 2016 #3
Powell did not use a private server. Skwmom Mar 2016 #7
Ahhh-had not heard the clarification fredamae Mar 2016 #11
The pundits and the Hillary campaign have not exactly been precise about this. merrily Mar 2016 #13
Here is what Powell did. Skwmom Mar 2016 #57
Thanks for the link as others may not take my word for it. merrily Mar 2016 #59
Control. earthside Mar 2016 #6
This is a conversation worth having CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #21
My understanding is that the State Dept server was notoriously unreliable. yardwork Mar 2016 #8
Who determined that and how? merrily Mar 2016 #10
No idea. I just shared what I'd read. yardwork Mar 2016 #12
You shared a strong statement as your own "understanding." merrily Mar 2016 #14
Mother Jones magazine, Rachel Maddow, numerous sources yardwork Mar 2016 #23
Yet, you missed very basic facts to support the claim? Powell did NOT use a private server, either. merrily Mar 2016 #25
I've seen that reported over and over. I trust Mother Jones. yardwork Mar 2016 #27
LINK, please, bearing in mind a private email account is different from a private server. Thanks. merrily Mar 2016 #29
Colin Powell did NOT use a private server. Skwmom Mar 2016 #37
Powell did NOT use a private server. I saw him interviewed on this on TV. merrily Mar 2016 #42
Hillary inherited a woefully inadequate but greatly improved network at the State. NWCorona Mar 2016 #43
You will soon be be "schooled" on how the Clintons have been persecuted so much they merrily Mar 2016 #9
And the man who set up the server just took a criminal immunity deal to talk elehhhhna Mar 2016 #15
They have a history of not always meaning much. Marcia Goodling is an example. merrily Mar 2016 #18
I agree that the immunity deal might not mean much. n/t Skwmom Mar 2016 #39
Sometimes the truth does come out. 840high Mar 2016 #50
Under those circumstances? Rarely. Then again, you rarely have this kind of situation. merrily Mar 2016 #55
Clearly. The Clintons are not victims as they like to claim. (nt) CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #19
They are their own worst enemies. (Oh, I forgot to cite the guy who stole only copies. merrily Mar 2016 #20
So far as I understand it, she was not required to turn over personal emails. randome Mar 2016 #16
I read the FBI recovered stuff that was thought to be deleted. n/t Skwmom Mar 2016 #40
But she will be. Very soon in fact. NWCorona Mar 2016 #44
If we ignore this until the general election we might have a very big October surprise. Vinca Mar 2016 #17
I agree with this. Absoultely. CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #22
Colin Powell used a private server when was Secretary of State. yardwork Mar 2016 #24
Nope. See Replies 7, 13 and 23. Thanks. merrily Mar 2016 #26
Your post 13 confirms that he did! yardwork Mar 2016 #28
WTF? No, it doesn't. For the 3rd time, a private email account is not a private server. merrily Mar 2016 #30
Nowhere in post 13 is that claim made. arcane1 Mar 2016 #31
To the contrary, one of the posts to which I referred yardwork, and one of my posts *to* yardwork merrily Mar 2016 #32
Exactly. And ALL of DU thought it was shady that the Bush team was using private accounts. arcane1 Mar 2016 #35
Nope, he didn’t. You can Google the facts and he never had a private server Arazi Mar 2016 #33
It's harder to converge both private and public interests mmonk Mar 2016 #34
Good post. I should have added that to my post that said ladjf Mar 2016 #38
It's been my thought all along. mmonk Mar 2016 #41
IMO, putting personal stuff on the server was part of the original plan that was in place merrily Mar 2016 #45
I think so. mmonk Mar 2016 #51
Plausible deniablity in case of a subpoena or FOIA request. Because not being able to find merrily Mar 2016 #54
Yep mmonk Mar 2016 #61
^^^^^That! Right there!^^^^^ n/t ebayfool Mar 2016 #47
Thanks mmonk Mar 2016 #53
Too lazy to worry with secure computer protocols. nt ladjf Mar 2016 #36
I doubt it. Calculation seems a lot more likely. merrily Mar 2016 #46
I agree. I was actually sort of joking about the lazy aspect. nt ladjf Mar 2016 #48
For me its not that she did it marlakay Mar 2016 #49
Operative word: against official RECOMMENDATIONS nt Nitram Mar 2016 #52
In a related question.... FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #56
Don't know. Is it a standard position? mmonk Mar 2016 #60
Yes, it is. Every agency is supposed to have an IG FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #62
How so? I'm interested to know. mmonk Mar 2016 #63
I edited my post to add a link for explanatory purposes. FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #64
Wow. I didn't know that (can't read the whole article since i mmonk Mar 2016 #65
excerpt FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #66
Interesting. Thanks. I do see a problem. mmonk Mar 2016 #67
Because she wanted to hide stuff.... hence "private"...it's kind of obvious. Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #58
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
2. H A Goodman. Paul supporter and Ratfucker extrodinaire.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:46 PM
Mar 2016

Some have even recently referred to him as a journalist. lol.

Really bad that people spreading the email deception don't get how bad they are being ratfucked even when it is Goodman and blatantly obvious.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
5. Clearly I have entered two facts into argument.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:49 PM
Mar 2016

Goodman was a Paul supporter until he saw dollar signs in another direction. Since that point he has obviously become ratfucker extraordinaire.

Second is that some have recently, and laughable, referred to this winger as a journalist.

His message is directed at LIV's and it works on a very small group. Goodman is pulling a Fox News on a small group on the left. Gotta make a living. Probably sits there in his office at night saying "I love the poorly educated."

Fuck this right wing ratfucker.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
7. Powell did not use a private server.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:55 PM
Mar 2016

The State Dept searched and found some old Colin Powell emails and classified them, which Powell called ridiculous and the Clintonites argued - see, it is a matter of over-classification.

Hmm.... I think it is much more likely that it was the State Dept helping out Clinton.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
11. Ahhh-had not heard the clarification
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:59 PM
Mar 2016

on Powells emails-Thank you!
However-that is what I am hearing from "pundits".

merrily

(45,251 posts)
13. The pundits and the Hillary campaign have not exactly been precise about this.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 03:02 PM
Mar 2016

Powell has said that, when he took over State (from Albright, I guess), there was almost nothing in place. He had to create the system. He also said that he occasionally used his private email account--private accounts like most of us, have, not a private server, like most of us don't have--for some purely administrative matters.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
6. Control.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:54 PM
Mar 2016

Hillary wanted control.

A control, in my opinion that comes from a sense of paranoia or persecution.

I don't know if she did anything illegal with this whole email server thing ... I think more importantly it shows in her Nixon-like control behavior.

And that concerns me a whole lot more than if she did anything illegal.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
21. This is a conversation worth having
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 03:19 PM
Mar 2016

Who was looped into this wall-off world that was her server?

I read that hardly anyone had her email address, not even John Kerry, and that they communicated to her through her assistants.

Did she conduct all official State business off of this server?

What about planning the overthrow of Libya? Robert Kagan, the founder of the neocon movement was one of her primary Middle East advisers. Any emails regarding Libya that demonstrate what she was doing? Obama has been quoted as distancing himself from what happened in Libya, calling it, "Hillary's project." Was she engaging in these high-level activities, while being advised by Kagan? What was Obama's role in all of this? How much was he 'in the loop'?

I'd like to know the logistics here, because it could give us some incredible insight into how she ran things.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
14. You shared a strong statement as your own "understanding."
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 03:06 PM
Mar 2016

Sounded like bs to me, so I asked a couple of obvious questions.

yardwork

(61,690 posts)
23. Mother Jones magazine, Rachel Maddow, numerous sources
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 03:40 PM
Mar 2016

Noted that it was common knowledge that the State Dept servers were unreliable. That's why Colin Powell used a private server when has Secretary of State.

Note that nobody ever investigated Powell for doing so.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
25. Yet, you missed very basic facts to support the claim? Powell did NOT use a private server, either.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 03:52 PM
Mar 2016

I saw him interviewed about this on TV. See replies 7 and 13. Thanks.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
29. LINK, please, bearing in mind a private email account is different from a private server. Thanks.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 03:58 PM
Mar 2016

BTW, Mother Jones does not know more about what Powell did than Powell himself knows.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
43. Hillary inherited a woefully inadequate but greatly improved network at the State.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 04:18 PM
Mar 2016

That doesn't excuse her for setting up a standalone system.

The fact is IT at the state department under Clinton massively degraded and weakened. The audits after her tenure were brutal. Google it for yourself if you don't believe me.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
9. You will soon be be "schooled" on how the Clintons have been persecuted so much they
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:58 PM
Mar 2016

are understandably cautious and other rationalizations galore.

Fact: Our legal system depends a great deal on people telling the truth when under oath and producing everything they've been asked to produce and without getting rid of anything before they comply.

Fact: When Hillary was subpoenaed, she took two years to comply, claiming the papers that had been subpoenaed had just turned up in the family dining room of the White House. This strained credulity, to say the least.

Fact: Susan McDougal went to jail rather than answer three questions about Bill Clinton. Not about herself, not about her husband, but about Bill Clinton.

Fact: Bill Clinton indisputably lied under oath on national television, in addition to parsing what the definition of is, is.

Fact: Hillary has been caught in some whoppers, though not created while she was under oath.

Fact: Hillary took two years to comply with an FOIA request, wiping her server first.

Fact: the man who set up the server for her took the Fifth when questioned.

Fact: The FBI, in the Executive Branch of a Democratic President, thought there was enough there to investigate.

Fact: A major part of the job description of a US President is faithful execution of our laws.

Fact: I expect this post to be alerted on, even though it contains only facts. If I am correct, that in itself will speak volumes, no matter what a jury decides to do with the alert.

Make of those facts whatever you will.




 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
15. And the man who set up the server just took a criminal immunity deal to talk
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 03:08 PM
Mar 2016

On Friday I think.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
18. They have a history of not always meaning much. Marcia Goodling is an example.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 03:12 PM
Mar 2016

When she testified, her answers were as limited and guarded as if no deal had been made. And whoever in Congress was questioning her did lousy jobs of it. It was little more than a dog and pony show for the TV cameras on both sides.

Whether people don't want to look bad or don't want to give up people they worked with or for, or whatever, the immunity deal is not a guaranty that the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth will come out.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
55. Under those circumstances? Rarely. Then again, you rarely have this kind of situation.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 05:20 PM
Mar 2016

I honestly don't expect much to come from the guy who set up the server. I don't even really expect him to be questioned very skillfully. Goodling sure wasn't and that was televised.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
16. So far as I understand it, she was not required to turn over personal emails.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 03:09 PM
Mar 2016

Most government regulations on this level contain similar loopholes. So she is perfectly within her rights to delete emails she deems personal. It's only if someone is caught attempting to delete official information that a problem arises.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)
[/center][/font][hr]

Vinca

(50,300 posts)
17. If we ignore this until the general election we might have a very big October surprise.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 03:11 PM
Mar 2016

They need to clear her or charge her ASAP. At the moment we have a second viable candidate in the race. In October we won't.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
22. I agree with this. Absoultely.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 03:25 PM
Mar 2016

Maybe she engaged in criminal activity. Maybe she didn't. Maybe this IT dude who was granted immunity will reveal substantive information that will lead to an indictment. Maybe what little he will say will provide nothing.

Whatever is going on, needs to be wrapped up sooner, rather than later.

Clear her and let's move on--or convene a grand jury, indict her--whatever.

And Clinton needs to call off her dogs, when it comes to bullying Sanders out of this race. She has no business telling half of the party and a formidable opponent to exit a political race.

We're in it for the long haul, honey. Don't like it...tough!

merrily

(45,251 posts)
30. WTF? No, it doesn't. For the 3rd time, a private email account is not a private server.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 04:01 PM
Mar 2016

Not even close. And Reply 13 spells that out. You're claim that I am the only playing games appears to be projection, at best.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
31. Nowhere in post 13 is that claim made.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 04:01 PM
Mar 2016

I have a private Yahoo email account, but I don't own my own email server.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
32. To the contrary, one of the posts to which I referred yardwork, and one of my posts *to* yardwork
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 04:04 PM
Mar 2016

specifically and clearly state that a private email account, which most Americans have, is very different from a private server.

I am not the one playing games.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
35. Exactly. And ALL of DU thought it was shady that the Bush team was using private accounts.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 04:11 PM
Mar 2016

This whole "But the Bushes did it too!" defense, even if it were accurate, is not really much of a defense.

If we let Bush's precedent determine what is right and wrong, we are truly doomed. It won't stop with email.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
33. Nope, he didn’t. You can Google the facts and he never had a private server
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 04:07 PM
Mar 2016

In fact iirc, Clinton is the only Administration member to have ever had their own private server

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
34. It's harder to converge both private and public interests
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 04:09 PM
Mar 2016

with a public server when looking to profit.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
38. Good post. I should have added that to my post that said
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 04:13 PM
Mar 2016

they may have been too lazy to worry with security protocols. You idea is more likely the real truth.


merrily

(45,251 posts)
45. IMO, putting personal stuff on the server was part of the original plan that was in place
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 04:20 PM
Mar 2016

before the server was even set up.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
54. Plausible deniablity in case of a subpoena or FOIA request. Because not being able to find
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 05:18 PM
Mar 2016

her records inside the white house for two years, until they mysteriously appeared in the dining room of the family quarters was not really plausible.

marlakay

(11,482 posts)
49. For me its not that she did it
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 04:24 PM
Mar 2016

Its that when they first asked for them she deleted a bunch saying they were personal, how does anyone know that?

FlatBaroque

(3,160 posts)
56. In a related question....
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 05:22 PM
Mar 2016

Why was there never a permanent Inspector General at State during her tenure?

FlatBaroque

(3,160 posts)
62. Yes, it is. Every agency is supposed to have an IG
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 06:39 PM
Mar 2016

yet for her entire tenure at State Hillary somehow managed to have a temporary person in there.


State Department Lacked Top Watchdog During Hillary Clinton Tenure


It is scandalous, really.

FlatBaroque

(3,160 posts)
66. excerpt
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 07:14 PM
Mar 2016
The lack of a confirmed inspector general raises questions about oversight of the department under Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton. The department has been criticized for its failure to gather and archive the email records of Mrs. Clinton and other officials and for responses to public-record requests that lawmakers and advocacy groups say were insufficient, including its response to requests for information from a congressional panel investigating the 2012 terror attack in Benghazi, Libya.

The vacancy in the top watchdog spot left the State Department with no confirmed inspector general for more than five years, the longest gap since the position was created in 1957, according to department records. While other agencies have had no permanent inspectors general at various points in recent years, some of those vacancies were due to a lack of confirmation by the Senate on nominees put forward by Mr. Obama.

...

The acting inspector general, Harold Geisel, had served in a variety of roles, including U.S. ambassador to Mauritius in Bill Clinton’s administration and in a State Department job under Richard Nixon. Because he was a longtime foreign-service officer, Mr. Geisel was banned by law from becoming permanent inspector general, a prohibition that Congress put in place to ensure that oversight is conducted by people who don’t have ties to the departments they investigate.

“It’s a convenient way to prevent oversight,” said Matthew Harris, a University of Maryland University College professor who has worked in law enforcement and researches inspectors general. Acting inspectors general “don’t feel empowered; they don’t have the backing of their people. They’re in a position where they could be removed at any moment,” Mr. Harris said.


Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why did Clinton Need A Pr...