Has been proven multiple times but people will only attack your link.

Disgusting.

(Will Rogers, speaking as Calvin Coolidge): "I am proud to report, that the country as a whole is prosperous. I don't mean by that, that the whole country is prosperous, but as a hole, it is prosperous. Now a hole is not supposed to be prosperous, and we are certainly in a hole.”

I'll have a look when I get a chance.

people usually know what they're going to be talking about before they give an interview on tv.

... about going to that last questioner's same Church, in that ridiculous question on Religion. (Who knew?)

Aside from the PLANT aspects, isn't there supposed to be something about separation of church and state in this country?

anything else.

The Clintons loved to paint Obama as the other during 2008.

That does not align with Hillary's C Street allies.

After all, this is a Christian nation, as they relentlessly remind us.

Anybody who aligns themselves with "The Family" is no friend of mine. And anybody who would mix religion and politics is my enemy.

I do not mind religious people in office. However, I reject people who think that to hold office means that they have some religious authority. And it is always authority with them, from above.

The more a candidate declares that, the less I will support them.

And " The Family" is a non-starter.

anymore because if they don't see how the media is spinning it now they never will.

Granted I've only been interviewed on local news, but I've never done an interview where they didn't tell me basically what they were going to ask before they rolled the camera. It's not like she was sitting down with Mike Wallace on 60 Minutes.

why wouldn't a reporter tell someone what questions they would ask? Wouldn't it make for a better interview?

Typically hosts go over what they are going to ask their guests.

religious questions during the debate.

Candidates and questioners should disclose such "coincidences" before asking or answering questions whenever possible in my opinion.

Otherwise, it looks like collusion. May not be, but that is how it appears to a completely objective viewer.

We'd like to know before an answer is given who knows whom because out her in nobody-important-land, we want to know who is really speaking and what the background relationships between the speakers are.

We also like to know what companies experts on TV are associated with. What causes, what interests?

It's kind of troubling and confusing to hear an answer to a question like the answer Hillary gave about prayer.

And what is more, the Constitution specifically bars applying a religious test for offices, so why do religious questions arise so often in the debates and interviews????? What relevance do religious answers have if we are, under the Constitution, not supposed to consider a person's religion when voting???

I'd like some answers to these questions. Thank you.

This is not concerning any particular candidate. In fact, these kinds of unmentioned relationships with businesses, churches, etc. should be revealed in any television interview.

Why not? If the relationship could be relevant and is not religious, why not? It would help viewers to understand what is being said and why.

Knocked down, like Democracy in Flint.

I'm saying this as a Sanders supporter - you're making something out of nothing

Silly season.

they don't want someone fumbling around trying to think of a response on live tv. A heads up regarding the question seems like an acceptable idea.