2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders Loves This $1 Trillion War Machine
The socialist trumpets his antiwar record. But he doesnt mind expensive war machinesif theyre based in his home state.
MANCHESTER, New Hampshire Sen. Bernie Sanders has railed against big defense corporations at rallies, but he has a more complex history with the military-industrial complex. Most notably, hes supported a $1.2 trillion stealth fighter thats considered by many to be one of the bigger boondoggles in Pentagon history.
Sanders has made his opposition to Hillary Clintons hawkishness a cornerstone of his campaign. But he hasnt exactly been antiwar all his career. When it has come time to choose between defense jobs and a dovish defense policy, Sanders has consistently chosen to stand with the arms-makers rather than the peaceniksleading to tension with some of the most adamant adherents of progressive ideology.
In 1985, for example, protesters massed at the General Electric plant in Burlington, Vermont, where Sanders was serving as mayor. They were protesting the fact that the plant was manufacturing Gatling guns to fight socialists in Central America.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/09/bernie-sanders-loves-this-1-trillion-war-machine.html
Sanders is very good at fooling the young whom are still wet behind the ears!
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)There were protesters who were unhappy that General Electric was manufacturing Gatling guns at the plant, and so they would lock themselves to the gates and engage in civil disobedience. And so the mayor, Bernie, finally got cops to go in and arrest the protesters, Condon told The Daily Beast. The GE plant was one of the largest providers of jobs in the city. So it was economically important that the plant stay open and people who worked there went to work.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Response to Punkingal (Reply #3)
Post removed
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)These were not the only relationships bridging leaders of the two nations. In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contributed at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, the philanthropic enterprise she has overseen with her husband, former president Bill Clinton. Just two months before the deal was finalized, Boeing -- the defense contractor that manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to acquire, the F-15 -- contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release.
The Saudi deal was one of dozens of arms sales approved by Hillary Clintons State Department that placed weapons in the hands of governments that had also donated money to the Clinton family philanthropic empire, an International Business Times investigation has found.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)But how about addressing the OP?
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)a cool story............. for the MIC and the Clinton Foundation
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)But hey Maybe when he's elected he'll have them retrofitted to deliver free college and unicorn sparkle ponies rather than weapons.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)What next? The Washington Times?
Oh, and extra kudos for ragging on the millennials! Good job!
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Along with some other people favorable to Hillary?
No conflict of interest there, no sirree!
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)don't care. Oh wait yes I do. I want the US to have a military. And yes, I know it's way too big. I would cut it down to 25% of what it is today. And I realize not everything the military builds is going to be great, probably why they build different things whatever. I just would never advocate leaving our military defenseless or with less than state of the art equipment.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Aspire to inspire.[/center][/font][hr]
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Personally I think we could do with maybe having just 20 bases in the world rather than like 900, but that's probably just me.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)here is a helpful tutorial on the difference between "who" and "whom".
http://www.elearnenglishlanguage.com/blog/english-mistakes/who-vs-whom/
Now you can sound even smarter.
forjusticethunders
(1,151 posts)"I don't want them to spend the money on this plane, but if they're going to do it, I might as well get it built in Vermont." But hey, Bernie isn't pragmatic right?