Those jobs wouldn't be there without the help of the US Govt and programs.

In their 4th quarter fillings they stated:
"Fourth-quarter revenue fell about 4 percent to $23.57 billion. Analysts expected $23.53 billion, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S."

See that: $23.57 billion in a single quarter. Screw them. Pulling down they kind of coin I am sure then can figure it out.

The maintenance they must do? The development they must do? And remember revenue figure is just top line sales, or at least that's how you've framed it.

I could check the 10k to get more information.

Not going to concede any points to giving billions of dollars in corporate giveaways to anyone.

Yes, its hight, but they have to pay for thousands of employees and building 50 or so commercial planes is not cheap. I dont give a crap about revenue.

What's really revealing is that Airbus statements seem to show a loss, yet they are propped up by the Euro governments... And Sanders wants to end that here in the states, and that could cause companies like Boeing to go under or have to significantly reduce their size.

I can't support that.

except when they are not.

They get euros.

It has a government charter but it's not like it's taxpayer money; it's an actual bank.

Those countries?

Sure we spend the most on it and we probably should not spend as much as we do but how does that relate to what Airbus gets vs. what Boeing gets in subsidies.

Did you miss that?

like our citizens and, yes, even corporate welfare not related to war.

But Boeing IS war.