2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Full Communism Exchange
SALINAS: In 1985, you praised the Sandinista government and you said that Daniel Ortega was an impressive guy. This is what you said about Fidel Castro. Let's listen.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
SANDERS: You may recall way back in, when was it, 1961, they invaded Cuba, and everybody was totally convinced that Castro was the worst guy in the world. All the Cuban people were going to rise up in rebellion against Fidel Castro. They forgot that he educated their kids, gave them health care, totally transformed their society.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
SALINAS: In South Florida there are still open wounds among some exiles regarding socialism and communism. So please explain what is the difference between the socialism that you profess and the socialism in Nicaragua, Cuba and Venezuela.
SANDERS: Well, let me just answer that. What that was about was saying that the United States was wrong to try to invade Cuba, that the United States was wrong trying to support people to overthrow the Nicaraguan government, that the United States was wrong trying to overthrow in 1954, the government -- democratically elected government of Guatemala.
Throughout the history of our relationship with Latin America we've operated under the so-called Monroe Doctrine, and that said the United States had the right do anything that they wanted to do in Latin America. So I actually went to Nicaragua and I very shortly opposed the Reagan administration's efforts to overthrow that government. And I strongly opposed earlier Henry Kissinger and the -- to overthrow the government of Salvador Aliende (ph) in Chile.
I think the United States should be working with governments around the world, not get involved in regime change. And all of these actions, by the way, in Latin America, brought forth a lot of very strong anti-American sentiments. That's what that was about.
SALINAS: Senator, in retrospect, have you ever regretted the characterizations that you made of Daniel Ortega and Fidel Castro that way?
SANDERS: I'm sorry. Please say that...
SALINAS: In retrospect, have you ever regretted the characterizations of Daniel Ortega and Fidel Castro that you made in 1985?
SANDERS: The key issue here was whether the United States should go around overthrowing small Latin American countries. I think that that was a mistake...
SALINAS: You didn't answer the question.
SANDERS: ...both in Nicaragua and Cuba. Look, let's look at the facts here. Cuba is, of course, an authoritarian undemocratic country, and I hope very much as soon as possible it becomes a democratic country. But on the other hand...
(APPLAUSE)
...on the other hands, it would be wrong not to state that in Cuba they have made some good advances in health care. They are sending doctors all over the world. They have made some progress in education. I think by restoring full diplomatic relations with Cuba, it will result in significant improvements to the lives of Cubans and it will help the United States and our business community invest.
SALINAS: Thank you, Senator. Your time is up on that.
(APPLAUSE)
RAMOS: Secretary, I have a question on Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico is bankrupt. It owes more than $70 billion it cannot pay and we have a question from Facebook. Lian Purvea (ph) is asking you the following; I would like to know if during the first 100 days of your presidency, you will help Puerto Rico restructure its public debt and help its economy. The first 100 days, secretary.
CLINTON: Absolutely, although it happens before I am president if I am so fortunate to be. I have been calling for months that the Congress must give authority to Puerto Rico to restructure its debts.
(APPLAUSE)
CLINTON: Just like it has enabled states and cities to restructure their debt. And it's a grave injustice for the Congress, led by the Republicans to be refusing to enact that opportunity within the bankruptcy law.
And what we see in Puerto Rico now is a lot of suffering. We see schools being closed, we see health care being denied and we see a thousand Puerto Rican families a month moving to the United States, mostly to Florida.
Puerto Ricans are citizen of America.
(APPLAUSE)
CLINTON: They deserve to be treated as citizens and to be given the opportunity to get back on their feet economically. And I just want to add one thing to the question you were asking Senator Sanders. I think in that same interview, he praised what he called the revolution of values in Cuba and talked about how people were working for the common good, not for themselves.
I just couldn't disagree more. You know, if the values are that you oppress people, you disappear people, you imprison people or even kill people for expressing their opinions, for expressing freedom of speech, that is not the kind of revolution of values that I ever want to see anywhere.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/09/transcript-the-post-univision-democratic-debate-annotated/
Treat that how you wish, but the only thing Hillary even mentioned about it was the bolded part.
And, if you didn't see the debate, Hillary got questions like this too, including them playing a Fox News clip of a grieving Benghazi mother saying Hillary lied about Benghazi and then asking her to respond. This was the "gotcha" debate.
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)this might of been a big hit to Sanders, except Hillary had a melt down at some point and thought it would work to use Koch brothers, and lie about him being a member of minutemen vigilante groups? Please does she think Hispanics are fucking stupid? Such a obvious bold face lie at a debate focused on Latinos.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Bernie answered the questions well. Hillary doesn't get that that shit will only hurt her. Same thing happened in 08.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)But after her racist 2008 campaign hardly surprising.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Thanks for setting the record break.
renate
(13,776 posts)and less on doctors and stuff. I don't disagree with what he said but I wish he'd put the emphasis on no regime change rather than on praising the good aspects of those regimes.
Oh well. If it's a big thing he'll presumably get a chance to clarify and expand on this.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)crafting every word they say as Hillary, Cruz, or Rubio are doing. Sometimes when people are fed up with the lies their government tells they just want to hear a politician say what they truly think and believe.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)especially their work with Ebola in Africa.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)El Salvador and Guatamala were doing in the 1980s-- governments that Reagan was supporting (along with too goddamned many Democrats).
Thousands were murdered in Guatamala, while Reagan denied it was happening.
And now these things are happening in Honduras-- thanks in part to Hillary's actions as Secretary of State, refusing any diplomatic intervention against the right-wing coup there.
She has unmitigated gall to even have spoken those words.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)really, really weak. I expect that she'll lose the educated Latinos on this one but there are plenty of right wingers who'll like what she said.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)You have to give Bernie credit for not backing down and standing up for his remarks about his visits in 1985, but it will not make him popular in Florida or in the general election if he gets that far. I can hear Trump now......
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)The reality is that it's every US citizens responsibility to find out for themselves what the US is up to and Bernie was doing his job. This doesn't mean he supported them and I think he mad it clear he thinks Cuba is an authoritarian government.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Go back to the text of that segment of the debate (above) and read it.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)What are you referring to here?
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)...about his visits.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)And it was another era.
Of course I was a part of all of that so I understand it very well.
He did say the Cuban government wasn't perfect, an understatement, but what the US did to Cuba and was doing in Central America at the time was about 200000 worse.
Those numbers being fairly accurate since a couple of hundred thousand died in Ronnie Reagan's wars. Where was the outrage over that?
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)A bit of a "he made the trains rub on time" kind of thing. IMO, he needs to avoid looking like he's being an apologist for Castro or Ortega. Unfortunately, he WAS a but of an apologist, so he'll have to deal with that.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)I mean really?
kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)Anybody who lives in South Florida knows better. I admire Bernie for speaking the truth but he may have committed political suicide.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)They are Puerto Rican, Nicaraguan, etc. and they are much more liberal than the Cubans. Plus, the Cuban Americans, first and second generation, don't want to continue to cold war.
Those people were never interested in Bernie anyway.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)The older generation Cubans who take issue with Bernie's positions are going to vote Republican. Period. The younger generations who are likely Democratic voters could care less. He may lose some votes here and there, but he'll win some back with his stances on economic and social issues. At the end of the day, he probably won't win Florida anyway, but it's not going to have much of an effect on his overall vote totals in the state.
Stallion
(6,476 posts)at least 20 DU posters claimed to hear that Clinton called Bernie a Communist. BTW I agree with what Clinton said. You can't ignore that Castro's revolution resulted in an authoritarian dictatorship with violent repression, murder and purge of democratic voices and free speech
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Not such a great history of human rights there.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)If we didn't have free trade with China we would not be able to afford anything, sadly.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)If all that stuff was made here, people would have good paying jobs to buy them. The only ones who benefit are the Wall St. parasites. The free traders will never admit this. They will also not admit that when these jobs move overseas, we also lose tax income from the companies and the prosperity created by worker spending. Instead we prop up China and have to spend more to keep their military ambitions in check.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)that is the conclusion that too many Americans will reach if they see that clip. It's not really fair, but life isn't fair.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Someone needs to be concerned, don't you think?
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)aren't voting for him anyway. But thanks for playing.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)All campaigns do research to dig up dirt on their opponents, but they normally don't publicize that information immediately. They wait until the optimum opportunity to blind side their opponents. Sometimes they never use it at all for whatever reason. While I am sure that the Clinton organization was well aware of Bernie's visits to Nicaragua and Cuba and the interviews he gave later on the subject, I don't think they would have used the material for fear of alienating Bernie's supporters. You can bet, however that the Republicans would use it to try to destroy Bernie if he were to win the nomination.
However, the cat is now out of the bag now and you can bet that the Spanish language media is going to publicize this far and wide It makes a difference because it is not only Cubans who hate the communist and socialist governments, past and present, in their home countries. Bernie's original remarks and his refusal to repudiate them now is going to hurt him with Hispanics both now and in the GE if he gets that far. As you know the Hispanic vote is going to be crucial to electing a Democratic President.
That's fine if you want to brush this off, that's your opinion and you are entitled to it. However, the only reason that it has been a big deal until now is that the vast majority of the electorate that doesn't pay a lot of attention to politics had no knowledge of the incidents. Now that they will be aware,... well it is will be a big deal for many Hispanics and many Americans who hate the way the Cuban government treats its people, and that includes a lot of liberals who are all about human rights.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)for the reasons I mentioned. The ones who would care, aren't voting for him anyway. Younger voters have a different view. It's just the way it is.