Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDNC Chair: The way the media is reporting superdelegates is incorrect
Whatever one thinks of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Chair of the Democratic National Committee, we can all agree on one thing: there is no greater authority on the topic of so-called "super-delegates" to the Democratic National Convention (an event Wasserman Schultz runs) than Wasserman Schultz herself.
And Wasserman Schultz has been clear, as evident from the video above, that the national news media must stop tallying and reporting "super-delegates" immediately.
"The way the media is reporting this is incorrect," Wasserman Schultz told Rachel Maddow of MSNBC on February 20th. "There are not pledged delegates -- or 'super-delegates' -- earned at any of these caucus contests."
She went on to note that super-delegates are "free to decide [who to vote for] anytime up until July," and can change their mind at any time -- one reason they can't be reported as being conclusively attached to any particular candidate. "So combining them [the voted-on or 'earned' delegates and the super-delegates] at each phase of this contest is not an accurate picture of how this works," she said.
"It's really important to report these [super-delegates] in a completely different way," she added, in the event her repeated admonitions on the topic had been unclear.
...
And Wasserman Schultz has been clear, as evident from the video above, that the national news media must stop tallying and reporting "super-delegates" immediately.
"The way the media is reporting this is incorrect," Wasserman Schultz told Rachel Maddow of MSNBC on February 20th. "There are not pledged delegates -- or 'super-delegates' -- earned at any of these caucus contests."
She went on to note that super-delegates are "free to decide [who to vote for] anytime up until July," and can change their mind at any time -- one reason they can't be reported as being conclusively attached to any particular candidate. "So combining them [the voted-on or 'earned' delegates and the super-delegates] at each phase of this contest is not an accurate picture of how this works," she said.
"It's really important to report these [super-delegates] in a completely different way," she added, in the event her repeated admonitions on the topic had been unclear.
...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/seth-abramson/the-national-media-has-be_b_9364170.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
16 replies, 1446 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DNC Chair: The way the media is reporting superdelegates is incorrect (Original Post)
Cheese Sandwich
Mar 2016
OP
Or is she just hoping people will not notice in the event they are required to hand
libtodeath
Mar 2016
#5
You just passed in misinformation. Superdelgates are NOT required to do as you say.
riversedge
Mar 2016
#9
Kind of strange then that all of Hillary supporters have been pushing them as her inevitabilty.
libtodeath
Mar 2016
#12
I assume Maddow still includes superdels on her show despite this straight from the horses mouth?
Coincidence
Mar 2016
#8
nice attempt at deflecting blame Wasserman Schultz. Are we seeing the establishment turn on
liberal_at_heart
Mar 2016
#11
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)1. video
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)16. "I am obviously not supporting either one of the candidates"
OMG go to 3:00 in the video and watch her nearly unable to choke out this lie. Psychologists would have a field day with this bit.
Response to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)
virtualobserver This message was self-deleted by its author.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)3. Kick
I will need to write a story on this later
By the way this is why I refuse to tally them
salinsky
(1,065 posts)4. I hate when I agree with DWS ...
... it's a good thing it doesn't happen very often.
But if this is true than kudos to her for doing the right thing. She's still the devil of course, but at least she got this right
Wilms
(26,795 posts)10. Yep. I'm a bit humbled.
I thought she did a good job.
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)5. Or is she just hoping people will not notice in the event they are required to hand
it to Hillary against the will of the voters.
riversedge
(70,242 posts)9. You just passed in misinformation. Superdelgates are NOT required to do as you say.
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)12. Kind of strange then that all of Hillary supporters have been pushing them as her inevitabilty.
riversedge
(70,242 posts)13. You sure do a lot of broad brushing with your comment.
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)14. You are trying to have it both ways.
It gets boring.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)6. You know how to tell she is lying?
No need. Whatever she writes or says is pretty likely to be a falsehood.
Coincidence
(98 posts)8. I assume Maddow still includes superdels on her show despite this straight from the horses mouth?
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)11. nice attempt at deflecting blame Wasserman Schultz. Are we seeing the establishment turn on
each other in order to save their own butts?
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)15. She forgot to add "...just the way we all planned it". nt