Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:30 PM Mar 2016

Just a reminder that, according to research, only 31% of Americans identify themselves as Democrats.

42% identify themselves as Independents. In other words, Democrats need Independents.

I would also wager Democrats need Independents more than Independents need Democrats.

So, please keep that in mind while employing the "loyalty oaths" and "who is a true Democrat" demagoguery around here. A lot of Independents that you really need to keep on your side don't really like the imperial attitude.

In no way, however, does this suggest any of us do anything that would get Donald Trump elected. What he is appealing to these days is a cancer, or worse, on America's soul.

However, pay heed to the unrest he is appealing to. Acting like it's a big nothingburger is very dangerous. This isn't 1930's Germany but there's something going on in America that is way beyond the usual political cycle.

No matter who wins the nomination, we have a tough situation going forward. The political elites from both parties have sold us all out and there will be a reckoning unless things get better. If the neo-fascist tendencies on the Right prevail, it will be worse than the Bush years by a mile.

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just a reminder that, according to research, only 31% of Americans identify themselves as Democrats. (Original Post) Bread and Circus Mar 2016 OP
Honestly, if Bernie isn't the nominee revbones Mar 2016 #1
You seem to be concerned about political parties. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #5
It has a lot to do with what the Democratic party will be afterwards. revbones Mar 2016 #6
I see you are focused on something of no importance at this time. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #10
Apparently you are focused on the same thing revbones Mar 2016 #12
No, you dont understand. I dont care about political parties, at all. Now more than ever. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #14
So you just cryptically allude to something without stating it revbones Mar 2016 #17
No insult, I simply stated that you are concerned about viability of political parties. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #22
Meh. Your discourse leaves a lot to be desired. revbones Mar 2016 #23
Yeah, I am not concerned about my level of discourse, either. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #24
Sure, I didn't say you were concerned. revbones Mar 2016 #25
I wonder if the daily drumbeat of how Hillary is a liar or Hillary is Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #2
There's the flip side of that revbones Mar 2016 #8
Ignoring? How could they ignore it, they see it here all day long, they hear Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #13
They do ignore it and write it off as untrue revbones Mar 2016 #15
When it is about Bernie, it is called "vetting", I have noticed. :-) djean111 Mar 2016 #34
Hillary has made no attempt to EARN those votes yourpaljoey Mar 2016 #3
If we win the general election, 40% of our voters will be independents. DemocraticWing Mar 2016 #4
People can vote Dem in November or they can help elect a Republican. It really is that simple. LonePirate Mar 2016 #7
That's just as bad as the Hillary supporters loyalty oaths. nt revbones Mar 2016 #11
Then tell us why you think electing a Repub is better than electing a Dem. LonePirate Mar 2016 #18
I don't, I'm not voting for a Republican revbones Mar 2016 #21
If your principles help elect a Republican, what good are they? LonePirate Mar 2016 #27
You assume that my not voting for the candidate you think I should revbones Mar 2016 #28
Vote for whomever you prefer in the primaries. Vote for the Dem in November or you help a Repub. LonePirate Mar 2016 #29
So by your flawed logic revbones Mar 2016 #30
I didn't know simple math was flawed logic or was a difficult subject to understand. LonePirate Mar 2016 #39
Well, when you present something false or use poor logic then it can be off-putting to others revbones Mar 2016 #40
Except I didn't present anything false. You simply refused to accept it. LonePirate Mar 2016 #42
Math. revbones Mar 2016 #43
31% of Americans ir registered voters. R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2016 #9
just look at how Bernie is doing with everyone in the establishment against him. We are litlbilly Mar 2016 #16
I'm done with the Third Way Party, and after 4+ decades of being a loyal Dem, Zorra Mar 2016 #19
And some of those 31% are Ben Nelson-type "Democrats" nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #20
Don't worry - the Democrats, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz - are working to reduce that number! Maedhros Mar 2016 #26
I think they are at/near 22 year lows Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #31
Liberals and Progressives are neither stupid nor authoritarian. Maedhros Mar 2016 #36
I've been a registered Dem for almost 40 years. kiva Mar 2016 #32
"Democrats need Independents." apnu Mar 2016 #33
And I bet many of them will not be guilted or shamed into voting for Hillary pdsimdars Mar 2016 #35
Current Party Identification: Dems 34.4% Indep: 31.1% Repub: 27.3 Stallion Mar 2016 #37
I don't vote for labels. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #38
Any Democratic or GOP Presidential candidate - Hell Hath No Fury Mar 2016 #41
 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
1. Honestly, if Bernie isn't the nominee
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:34 PM
Mar 2016

Then I will rethink my membership in the party. I may keep it to vote in primaries, but Hillary is so distasteful that it will make it hard to remain in the party.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
10. I see you are focused on something of no importance at this time.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:40 PM
Mar 2016

There may be no political parties left to worry about if we are not careful.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
12. Apparently you are focused on the same thing
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:41 PM
Mar 2016

That's rather ignorance to say "Hey you're focused on something of no importance" but look at me focus on the same sort of thing. It's also fairly insulting.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
14. No, you dont understand. I dont care about political parties, at all. Now more than ever.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:42 PM
Mar 2016

This has nothing to do with political parties.

If you dont see what it does have to do with, even after all that has transpired, then I cant help you.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
17. So you just cryptically allude to something without stating it
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:44 PM
Mar 2016

and insult me and then say you can't help me? You're awfully sure of yourself there.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
22. No insult, I simply stated that you are concerned about viability of political parties.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:49 PM
Mar 2016

I am not.

I am concerned about the survival of the nation, and if someone like Cruz or Rubio were elected, maybe even Trump, the survival of all life on Planet Earth.

There is a phrase for that.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
25. Sure, I didn't say you were concerned.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:52 PM
Mar 2016

Obviously you aren't. First coherent thing you're stated in this subthread. Thanks.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
2. I wonder if the daily drumbeat of how Hillary is a liar or Hillary is
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:36 PM
Mar 2016

a Wall Street shill or how Hillary is bad for doing something with emails or Hillary is bad because of

blah, blah or blah,

I wonder if that plays into this problem you outline.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
8. There's the flip side of that
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:39 PM
Mar 2016

That constant ignoring of anything that might be negative about Hillary by her supporters, or lumping anything negative and true in with the stuff that isn't.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
13. Ignoring? How could they ignore it, they see it here all day long, they hear
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:41 PM
Mar 2016

it on all forms of the media constantly.

Aside from her cheerleaders like Chris Matthews and a couple others, she is on the receiving end of criticism constantly.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
15. They do ignore it and write it off as untrue
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:43 PM
Mar 2016

Otherwise, it would either indicate they just don't care or worse, quite severe things about their own beliefs.

yourpaljoey

(2,166 posts)
3. Hillary has made no attempt to EARN those votes
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:37 PM
Mar 2016

None whatever. I suspect the great majority of the Independents for Bernie will write
him in for the General. I hope she starts reaching out.

DemocraticWing

(1,290 posts)
4. If we win the general election, 40% of our voters will be independents.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:37 PM
Mar 2016

Unfortunately we don't have a process that allows independents to make up 40% of the electorate which chooses our candidate.

LonePirate

(13,431 posts)
7. People can vote Dem in November or they can help elect a Republican. It really is that simple.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:39 PM
Mar 2016

If voters think otherwise, they will start realizing the error of their judgment in January, if not sooner.

LonePirate

(13,431 posts)
18. Then tell us why you think electing a Repub is better than electing a Dem.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:45 PM
Mar 2016

Every single Repub candidate is horrible for America. Anyone who thinks differently is colossally wrong, not to mention being lost if they are posting here.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
21. I don't, I'm not voting for a Republican
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:49 PM
Mar 2016

But don't demand a loyalty oath from me expecting me to go against my principles.

LonePirate

(13,431 posts)
27. If your principles help elect a Republican, what good are they?
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:59 PM
Mar 2016

You seem to be dancing around the probability that you are voting third party or Independent in November. That's no different than voting for the Republican candidate as your vote is not helping the Dem candidate.

So how exactly will President Trump or President Cruz sit with your principles?

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
28. You assume that my not voting for the candidate you think I should
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:05 PM
Mar 2016

results in the response you think it will. This is your opinion you're trying to force on me.

1. I didn't say who I would vote for, I only said I wasn't voting for a Republican.
2. I did however compare your statement to all the loyalty posts from Hillary supporters.

You seem to think only general elections have consequences. Well primaries do as well. Some people will have issues voting for the was is supposedly the lesser of two evils simply because of the letter in the parenthesis after their name, or their team color. It seems to me that projecting your views on others because of your own fear about what might result in the future, does not constitute a valid argument. I get that you see it that way, but you should understand that not everyone does and attempting to guilt or play some weird future blame game on them, won't coerce them to your side.

LonePirate

(13,431 posts)
29. Vote for whomever you prefer in the primaries. Vote for the Dem in November or you help a Repub.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:26 PM
Mar 2016

I'm not sure why that simple logic fails to resonate with you. Then again, with all of the posts lately that prove people are bad at math because of their inability to understand the 538 model, I guess Inshould not be surprised by how people refuse to understand things nowadays. Thus, I can only surmise you want a Repub elected in November if you refuse to vote Dem in the GE.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
30. So by your flawed logic
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:29 PM
Mar 2016

if Bernie doesn't get the nomination, and I vote for Hillary I'm A-OK, but alternatively I've helped elect a Republican simply by not voting for Hillary in that scenario?

Where does it end? What if I voted for her and she lost? Is it my fault for not donating? Or not donating enough? Am I to blame for not canvassing or phonebanking?

No, your logic is flawed and has no end of blame for me in that scenario if she doesn't win. Loyalty oaths are bogus and you shouldn't try to enforce your version of future-events and future-blame on others.

LonePirate

(13,431 posts)
39. I didn't know simple math was flawed logic or was a difficult subject to understand.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 02:42 PM
Mar 2016

I guess I learned something on DU today - that some DUers have problems with these things. Thanks for opening my eyes!

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
40. Well, when you present something false or use poor logic then it can be off-putting to others
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 02:50 PM
Mar 2016

But I'm glad to have helped.

LonePirate

(13,431 posts)
42. Except I didn't present anything false. You simply refused to accept it.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 03:06 PM
Mar 2016

It's evident that math is a challenge for you. Let me help.

Let's say you live in a state where the Repub candidate receives 500 votes and the Dem candidate received 500 votes. However, you and your principles voted for some third party candidate instead of voting Dem. The courts or state government or US House now decides that your state grants all of its electoral votes to the Repub candidate and we now have President Trump or President Cruz. If you had voted Dem instead, the Dem candidate would have won 501-500 and we would not have a Repub president. However, you would still have your principles as the Repub president packed the Supreme Court will new Scalia clones and the all Repub Congress passed every law imaginable that is in complete lets contrast to Bernie's agenda. Of course your principles will insulate you from all of this misery as you remain oblivious to reality.

Welcome to my ignore list!

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
43. Math.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 03:13 PM
Mar 2016

Even though I got ignored, since this is public I'll respond.

If voter A does not vote for Hillary then Hillary gets 0 votes from that transaction
If voter A also does not vote for Trump, then Trump gets 0 votes from that transaction

Unless there are now magic votes, Trump did not gain a vote in that scenario. So the whole thing LonePirate presented before insulting and running away was a false narrative.

 

litlbilly

(2,227 posts)
16. just look at how Bernie is doing with everyone in the establishment against him. We are
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:44 PM
Mar 2016

doing amazing. The more the M$M etc push back against Bernie the more people who will get on board.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
19. I'm done with the Third Way Party, and after 4+ decades of being a loyal Dem,
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:46 PM
Mar 2016

will be registering as an Independent after the Democratic National Convention.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
26. Don't worry - the Democrats, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz - are working to reduce that number!
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:56 PM
Mar 2016

I bet they can get it down to below 25% by the time the election is over!

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
36. Liberals and Progressives are neither stupid nor authoritarian.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 02:19 PM
Mar 2016

They will not continue to support a Party that is so nakedly corrupt.

kiva

(4,373 posts)
32. I've been a registered Dem for almost 40 years.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:35 PM
Mar 2016

The only reason I am currently registered as a Democrat is because I'm going to my county caucus next month as a Sanders delegate and suspect I need to be registered as a Dem to caucus (I'm lazy and haven't looked up the rules to confirm this, so might be wrong).

As soon as I caucus I'm changing my affiliation for the first time in my life to "unaffiliated" because of the actions of the Democratic Party.

apnu

(8,759 posts)
33. "Democrats need Independents."
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:41 PM
Mar 2016

This is true of the Republicans also. Every election is mostly about who can get the most independents and how to get them to the polls. Secondary to that, each election, is about how to motivate actual party members to show up too.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
38. I don't vote for labels.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 02:29 PM
Mar 2016
"I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever, in religion, in philosophy, in politics, or in anything else, where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent. If I could not go to heaven but with a party, I would not go there at all." Thomas Jefferson
 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
41. Any Democratic or GOP Presidential candidate -
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 02:54 PM
Mar 2016

(or DUer) that says their campaign doesn't "need" Independents to win an election if flat-out delusional or has zero knowledge of the electoral make-up.

Saying "Independents don't matter" is akin to claiming the earth is flat. Seriously.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Just a reminder that, acc...