Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:46 AM Mar 2016

Democracy..... So near...Yet so far

No not utopia. Not some socialist paradise.

Not asking much.

Just a country that shakes off the Monopolistic Matrix of Power and Money that has been sucking the marrow out of this nation since at least 1980.

Not an impossible dream. After all, business as usual today would have been inconceivable before the Big Bipartisan Con began.

Just a country in which there is a balance between the profit motive and the public interest.

Just a country in which there is actual competition, instead of 20 choices all offered by the same corporation.

Just a country in which average people and the poor are truly represented in government. Not just symbolically represented.

Just a country in which politicians say what they mean...and mean what they say.

But once again looks like we might get nothing -- but a choice between slowly curdling and getting worse (Clinton), and racing for the worst (Trump or Kaisich).

Oh well. So much for democracy.

I guess George Carlin was right.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democracy..... So near...Yet so far (Original Post) Armstead Mar 2016 OP
You're putting the cart before the horse. We need to lock up the Supreme Court first. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #1
One of the two reasons I'll end up pulling the lever for her Armstead Mar 2016 #3
democracy isn't always pretty and the elite control much of the direction beachbum bob Mar 2016 #2
Yah maybe...But the title of my OP says it all for me Armstead Mar 2016 #4
The elite have pretty much always controlled the direction of the party HereSince1628 Mar 2016 #10
I honestly thought the 2008 financial meltdown would do it. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #5
I think Obama could have done it..... but the corporate Wall St. types got to him Armstead Mar 2016 #6
I disagree. The Republican base wouldn't move their representatives. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #7
I think if Obama had been more like his second term 2.0 could have fought harder Armstead Mar 2016 #8
Like Teddy Roosevelt, we need a significant portion of the Republican base to avoid obstruction. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #9
I hope it don't require that but I'd also say..... Armstead Mar 2016 #12
I have found the Trump supporter hard to discern. I understand your point of view on economics. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #16
Trump's a phony...but... Armstead Mar 2016 #17
Clinton: 8,640,761... Sanders: 6,104,880... Clinton +2,535,881 jcgoldie Mar 2016 #11
I suspect if was a vote on actual issues, a lot more Democrats would be aligned with Sanders Armstead Mar 2016 #13
That's where the despair is coming from this morning. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #14
Yep. Had it been a fair and square and honest campaign on a level playing field.... Armstead Mar 2016 #15
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
3. One of the two reasons I'll end up pulling the lever for her
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:52 AM
Mar 2016

The other is that the GOP sucks worse.

Not very inspriring motivation, but have gotten used to it. Life will go on, and hopefully we won't hit true dystopia too soon.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
2. democracy isn't always pretty and the elite control much of the direction
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:51 AM
Mar 2016

and it becomes frustrating I know....the lesser of 2 evils is still the lesser of 2 evils.. You and others know what would happen to our country if a conservative gets into the whitehouse


the lesser of 2 evils is still better than a known evil of the magnitude of today's conservatives

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
10. The elite have pretty much always controlled the direction of the party
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:25 AM
Mar 2016

The DLC and the front-loading of southern states in "super-Tuesday" was a consequence of unseating the previous powers-that-were who are referred to a "northeastern Liberals".

Once these syndicates of control become established they are rather hard to unseat. They exist to maintain control and as PTB construct and maintain rules that promote those who share their political views.



 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
5. I honestly thought the 2008 financial meltdown would do it.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:59 AM
Mar 2016

It did for many Democrats but the Republican base hasn't moved much. I fear that it will take another and more severe economic collapse to galvanize the common American into demanding change. The difference between the Hillary and Sanders camps has just been the issue of timing IMO.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
7. I disagree. The Republican base wouldn't move their representatives.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:06 AM
Mar 2016

I think those thick headed fools need another economic meltdown before they wake up.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
8. I think if Obama had been more like his second term 2.0 could have fought harder
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:09 AM
Mar 2016

And rallied us to better things and beat back the GOP.

But it's all speculation. It is what it is.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
9. Like Teddy Roosevelt, we need a significant portion of the Republican base to avoid obstruction.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:13 AM
Mar 2016

One Party can't defeat the special interest alone. The Republican base cheered on their representatives as they shutdown government, used an unprecedented amount of filibusters and voted 62 times to repeal the ACA. That's why I think it will take another economic collapse to wake those fools up.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
12. I hope it don't require that but I'd also say.....
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:44 AM
Mar 2016

There's a flip side to Trump's popularity on the other side. There's an economic populist element to it that is also a rebellion against that party's corporate establishment too.

In addition to the creepy bigot factor, I think it does show that a lot of GOP rank and file people are fed up with their party's corporate dominance too. I think more of them are seeing through the veil of their own party's allegiance to economic special interests at their own expense.

That is NOT to defend Trump, or to deny the bigotry involved. But economically, I think there's a message there that democrats should be paying attention to.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
16. I have found the Trump supporter hard to discern. I understand your point of view on economics.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:10 AM
Mar 2016

But Trump talks in broad generalities about the economy. What are these Trump supporters grabbing hold of on economics when the guy limits himself to saying that he's going to make great deals ? The guy has his clothing line manufactured abroad.

I sense another thing though. Nixon took the most virulent racists off our hands in 1968. How many racists have built up in our Party since 1968 ? Could this just be a second purging ? If so, I say good riddance.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
17. Trump's a phony...but...
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:15 AM
Mar 2016

IMO he is striking a chord of discontent among Republicans and conservatives against the effects of trickle down (piss on) economics and their party's orientation to the Wealthy and Powerful.

It's paradoxical I realize, but trump's a good salesman, and he is pitting himself (publicly) against the vested special economic interests min symbolic terms.

If the Democrats were smart, they'd see that as an opportunity to do some poaching to weaken the GOP. But that would also require changes in that party too.

jcgoldie

(11,631 posts)
11. Clinton: 8,640,761... Sanders: 6,104,880... Clinton +2,535,881
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:40 AM
Mar 2016

Democracy | Definition of Democracy by Merriam-Webster

Full Definition of democracy. plural de·moc·ra·cies. 1 a : government by the people; especially : rule of the majority b : a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
14. That's where the despair is coming from this morning.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:51 AM
Mar 2016

It's not the seeming inevitability of the loss of the race, it's the greater loss to the people. We were so close. Now it looks like business as usual, a "choice" between a tool of the oligarchy and an actual oligarch.

Cascadian independence can't come too soon...

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
15. Yep. Had it been a fair and square and honest campaign on a level playing field....
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:54 AM
Mar 2016

it'd be a lot easier to shrug shoulders and say "Oh well my candidate lost."

This was more symbolic of much deeper forces.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Democracy..... So near......