2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie: "I told you, you had 4 minutes"
Wow, he really comes off as imperious. And like a jerk.
"I told you you had four minutes. You had more than four minutes, Sanders told Resnik after the interview ended. I didnt walk away, you persisted.
Im a reporter, Resnik replied. Thats what we do.
Dont say I walked away, Sanders chided Resnik. You got four minutes
that was the time that was allotted.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/evanmcsan/dont-say-i-walked-away-bernie-says-after-ending-local-news-i#.nsAjjlMRL6
bravenak
(34,648 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)Respectfully, if that is your position, then I will only talk to white people about how we are going to deal with these very real problems,'
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Everybody knows I think white folks need to help each other because we dark folks get it. Respectfully, It is my position that I'd like you to go talk to other white people about how we are going to deal with these very real problems. Many of them are uneducated on race and need your help and would be offended if it came from me, as I get offended when it comes from them.
We on the left can discuss matters and our white allies can help us by fanning out among the white population and educate them on these very real issues. No disrespect.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)We don't need to talk to black people, we need to listen to black people and then we need to talk to white people. Lord knows black people have spent centuries figuring out what white folks are talking about because their lives depended on it. White people have been in the position of not having to figure out what the oppressed are saying. Those days are rapidly coming to an end. I welcome it. It is up to white people to fix ourselves because we are not the future of the world. The times they are a changin
bravenak
(34,648 posts)That's how I feel too.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Grown2Hate
(2,012 posts)to spark conversation and to explain to fellow white people what is ACTUALLY going on. I know that it smacks them across the face more (not in a violent sense; in the sense of a WAKE UP call) coming from someone of the same skin tone because then they can't claim, "Oh, there you go, playing the RACE card". NO. Here I am playing the REALITY card, so wake the fuck up and see what is going on around you. Not that I'm some "great" or "enlightened" person. I'm just doing my best to do my part to ignite SOMETHING in the sleeping masses.
Response to bravenak (Reply #17)
Post removed
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Can u please clarify your question?
Zira
(1,054 posts)They said everytime Bernie Sanders mentions blacks, he's also mentioning jails. He mentions it in getting the incarceration problem fixed as it affects blacks unevenly because of racism in arrests and courts. And Black Lives Matter needs to quit mentioning how they wouldn't vote for a white man when they mention Bernie sanders. Just saying. Or, heck they can continue and do as they want. It's not doing anything for all of us whites who have supported them.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)That just won't do. LGBT groups already knew that about him.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)But nobody pretends she is perfect like folks do with him. Her imperfections do not fix his, so bringing her up does nothing for me. I do not love them. They are politicians. He gets very indignant and allows his staffers to say dumb stuff, like calling southern states the confederacy, but only after black voters down there gave her such huge margins.
Something is off with his entire camp, imo.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)The same can be said of Hillary supporters.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)But after netroots...........
I saw enough.
I should post a link or two for you cause then you'd see why I am so fierce. Hillpeeps were just as confused as everybody but me, but they quickly stfu and waited to understand the BLM movement. When they interrupted Hillary? Half her fans were cheering them on, like, so what, they gotta do what they gotta do to survive. His peeps? I aint NEVER SEEN THE LIKE. Talmbout 'we won't suuport your causes unless you disavow blm!"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251502640
This one is special:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251687330
The replies to this op:http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026999627
Click the link on this op and you will see it was retracted, but it got full throated approval:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251505656
This one accusing BLM of trying to wage WAR one white liberals. : http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251503212
Attacking BLM protestor for her HIGH SCHOOL BACKPACK BUTTON.: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027060303
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251506368
Posted by bravenak | Wed Nov 18, 2015, 08:14 PM (1 replies)
Now. Had anybody reflected on this and actually changed, I'd stfu real quick. I dont need to be sweet talked but I do need shit correct. Bernie was asked about this and refused to comment.
Had he said thing one I'd trust that he cares more than she does. But this anything in the name of revolution stuff leave us open to garbage. And they are UNAPOLOGETIC about it.
840high
(17,196 posts)the great liar. You must believe her. That's an order.
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)Just kidding... Hi bravenak. Good to see you out of prison... again.
TYY
William769
(55,147 posts)On Fri Mar 18, 2016, 10:59 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
"I SAID BLACK FIFTY TIMES!!"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1528009
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Racist nonsense directed at Sanders and his supporters.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Mar 18, 2016, 11:06 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Content is factual. Sanders said that. Citation http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/2/12/1484405/-Bernie-Sanders-I-said-black-50-times-That-s-the-51st-time
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Love u. Please alert the jury so that admins can look at the alerter and jury, thank you, B.
William769
(55,147 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Wow.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)the jury system fails us all. Old days, mods would have rolled their eyes at that alert, so the alerter would have to choose between posting it publicly and taking a serious ass-whooping or saying nothing. Now, you can passive aggressively alert to the jury in complete anonymity with a pretty good chance of getting a hide (3-4 people? For a thing that Bernie Sanders actually said? Get OVER yourselves...)
I DARE the person who sent that to post it publicly and let us have our say back at you. Quit cowering. It is sneaky and weak.
William769
(55,147 posts)wildeyed
(11,243 posts)Then maybe people would like him better.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Very unbecoming, but I'm not really surprised.
Respectfully, if that is your position, then I will only talk to white people about how we are going to deal with these very real problems,'
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)unlike some other candidates.
comradebillyboy
(10,147 posts)attention, you'd think he might want to talk to local news media in a state where he really needs to win big.
dogman
(6,073 posts)That would be jerky.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)in very condescending way........
Bleacher Creature
(11,256 posts)The contrast between HRC calmly dealing with a bunch of crazies ALL DAY and Bernie not being able to keep his cool for a few minutes is striking.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)Respectfully, if that is your position, then I will only talk to white people about how we are going to deal with these very real problems,'
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)so he doesn't run into Hillary's problem of always being late and keeping people waiting.
Billsmile
(404 posts)Apparently a reporter asked an inappropriate question about Sanders' wife just prior to Bernie's exit.
http://gawker.com/bernie-sanders-walks-out-of-on-camera-interview-after-q-1765769530
bravenak
(34,648 posts)on that page without continuously reloading?
And if youre thinking it sounds like something is missing in this story, it is: The reporters actual question. The station has so far declined to air ita fairly important detail to leave out.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Makes much more sense now!!
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)(I don't generally watch vids, but I did this one.)
And it was not anything like the lengthy, agitated response described a few posts up. It was a brief answer to a brief question in a series of questions. Definitely no fireworks occurred in the last several seconds of the interview.
My impression was he just had to leave. Even assuming my impression is correct, yes, it could have been handled more gracefully. But I also think the station made way too much out of it.
But I also realize not everyone will do to suit me....! ;->
bravenak
(34,648 posts)These things get blown way up. Like Hillary barking. It was FUNNY. But they attack her... If I were him I'd actually ignore this little controversy.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Like, a dog barks when repubs lie, so the dog just bark bark barks all the time cause they lie lie lie. Funny. True too!!
Response to bravenak (Reply #19)
Name removed Message auto-removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I wanna know what they said to piss him off. It had to be a dumb ass question. Since they wont tell us I am force to think it was a bad question. But he shoulda stayed right there and fought back
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)I didn't see that in the excerpt posted by the station. It definitely didn't occur just before he left, unless somebody edited something.
Not that it will matter in 100 years (as my mom used to say).
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)The reporter went after Bernie's wife, and you could tell that really pissed him off.
Earlier today, DUers were accusing Jane Sanders of meeting with Joe Arpaio--and how could she do such a thing.
I think what all of this boils down to is this:
The media today (and many on social media) have framed the narrative about Sander's wife in a very incorrect and unfair context. They are repeatedly saying that Sander's wife met with Joe Arpaio and that she used poor judgment, etc.
Bernie is asked about his wife stopping at the tent city/Arpaio and Bernie abruptly interrupts him and says that his wife did stop at the tent city. He said it was a place that should not exist. And he reveals that Arpaio crashed her visit and showed up unannounced. Bernie seemed disgusted about this. I can only imagine what happened to Jane, most likely when Bernie was not there. Joe showed up and turned it into a shit show.
And I imagine that it was horrendously painful for Jane to see what she did. These are immigrants who have been rounded up and word is that they are living in deplorable conditions that are unfit for animals. I imagine that she was gobsmacked by the entire ordeal.
And what do you want to bet that Bernie spent some time before that interview listening to her account of what happened with Arpaio and also her description of how these immigrants were being treated and housed.
And when this reporter went after Bernie--I imagine emotion got the best of him.
He loves his wife. The world is fucked up and we're penning people like animals. And the reporter was furthering the talking points.
So, he politely told him the interview was finished.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)What I saw was three or four questions (one about the tent camp, but I didn't see Bernie becoming perturbed and it was a short answer) and then Bernie got up as the reporter was asking him another question about the vice-presidency.
I'd be interested to hear the reported long answer about the tent camp, but I did not see it in the station's excerpt.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)Neither do I
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)That's his whole attitude. He's too above the rest of us to have to speak with us.
Response to MaggieD (Reply #22)
Name removed Message auto-removed
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Not the reality. I was and activist for 15 years. He never did jack for us.
Response to MaggieD (Reply #28)
Name removed Message auto-removed
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)That is a fantastic video, I am so bookmarking it for the next time this lie about his record is used here.
Thank you!!!
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It was a symbolic gesture that acknowledged their right to oppose same sex marriage.
In 1972 Bernie wrote a letter calling for the abolishment of laws making homosexuality illegal:
Todays Supreme Court decision was a monumental moment in American history, as it guaranteed the right for gays and lesbians to get married and established full marriage equality.
Many politicians offered their words of support, including President Obama and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.
Yet it is important to remember that Obama and Clinton both opposed marriage equality as late as early 2012. It is a testament to the work of thousands of activists over decades that the political class was pulled towards supporting equality.
There is however one prominent politician who did not wait so long to call for full gay equality: Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
In a letter he published in the early 1970s, when he was a candidate for governor of Vermont from the Liberty Union Party, Sanders invoked freedom to call for the abolition of all laws related to homosexuality:
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/bernie-sanders-was-full-gay-equality-40-years-ago
Funny thing for a homophobic person to write, don't you think?
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And he didn't do jack. That's why none of the executive directors of the Human Rights Campaign have ever met him. That's why he thinks the largest LGBT organization in the country is called the Human Rights FUND instead of its real name.
He's a fraud.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)You've been on DU for 15 years (whoo, that' a long time!) so i'm sure you've posted many, many threads about sanders' duplicity and mistreatment of GLBT people, yes?
Can you point me towards three of your OP's on the subject? One caveat - they've gotta be from before he announced his candidacy last year.
Thanks ahead of time for your useful contribution!
Autumn
(45,082 posts)sending you something
karynnj
(59,503 posts)Per people who were, as mayor he insured that unmarried (gay or straight) couples got the medical benefits.
progressoid
(49,990 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Hey YOU weren't there either!!1!
jfern
(5,204 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Why do you think actual LGBT people should be grateful to him for criticizing a rethug for saying homo? We get called that every day.
Swoon, our hero, Saint Bernard, who claims he's my champion even though he never did jack for us. Whatever.
jfern
(5,204 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Please stop straight 'splaining to me about events where I was actually there. No, Bernie was no champion of LGBT rights. He just was not. He was the same imperious jerk who talked to that reporter.
I will tell you this. I can clearly see how he and his supporters irritate the shit out of AA people.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)If that were true you wouldn't be making up stories about it.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)That's why I told DU he didn't do shit for us months before the news articles came out. Bernie was a ghost to LGBT groups. Too imperious to bother to do shit, very states rights on our issues, and in no way willing to get off his ass to do anything for LGBT people.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/10/05/bernie_sanders_on_marriage_equality_he_s_no_longtime_champion.html
And you know what? That's all fine. What is NOT fine is for him to lie his ass off about it later. I imagine AA folks feel the same way with his MLK bullshit.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Post the quote where he said he opposed marriage equality or admit you made it up.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Stop fibbing about it. And stop acting like you were there working on this issue. You weren't there. You're trying to straight splain it. How did white splaining work out?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Why won't you post the exact quote you keep claiming is in there?
Surely you must be able to type it out, after all you were there, weren't you?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I can say it fifty times...
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Makes me want shake some sense into some people sometimes.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Or rip my own face off. Just, arggg!
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Nothing like having folks who aren't in our shoes 'splain to us over and over that Bernie's been fighting for us all these years, even though we know better than they do who the real fighters were and it wasn't him.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)This is not a really good issue for a Hillary supporter.
Pick your battles. This is not an issue on which Hillary wins.
I'm a Bernie supporter but . . . . what can I say?
This is not a good issue for Hillary. There is at least one video of her, a fairly recent video, saying that marriage is a religious rite.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It doesn't matter if you find them inconvenient.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)So typical.
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)... and he has a 100% rating with the Human Rights Campaign. http://www.hrc.org/elected-officials/profile/senate/92#.Vuy85CmPTWO
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
President Obama on Wednesday publicly endorsed gay marriage. "I applaud the president's historic announcement and his commitment to equal rights for all Americans," said Sen. Bernie Sanders. "I am proud to represent the first state in the country to allow civil unions and the first state where the Legislature allowed same-sex marriage without a court order. I am glad that the president is now on board." http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/recent-business/a-major-milestone-on-gay-marriage
TYY
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)kath
(10,565 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Whoopsie That's right, the Clinton's supported that.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)She was there alright, standing in the way.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)In fact she helped us get 9 other senators to vote against the anti marriage amendment you reference in this video. Bernie didn't do jack, of course. And stated he was against our right to marry in 2006.
It's a shame you folks keep posting this right wing bullshit edit of her speech.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The jig is up, Maggie, you've been repeatedly caught making up stories and that video completely destroys your "version" of the events.
You weren't there and you have no facts to back up your claims.
jfern
(5,204 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)What the fuck was that supposed to accomplish? Lip service is cheap.
jfern
(5,204 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)He voted against DADT so the military could keep kicking out LGBT people? LOL! And states rights on DOMA.
Here he is denying us marriage rights.
http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4550754/sanders-opposed-federal-marriage-equality-2006
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)He opposed allowing the feds to overturn states who had passed same sex legislation.
jfern
(5,204 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)As I asked below - prove it. What other political figures were in the meetings with us regarding the anti marriage amendment? If you were there that's an easy question.
Put up or shut up, BMUS.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I don't give a crap where you say you were, your stories about his "opposition" to marriage equality are bull.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)How did you miss it?
http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4550754/sanders-opposed-federal-marriage-equality-2006
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)What video are you watching?
Post the exact quote.
If you can't then obviously you must be making it up.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)A: I believe marriage is a states rights issue.
In others words no, he did not support federal marriage rights. Now, as a straight person you may wish to think that is supporting LGBT marriage rights (because you don't understand this issue AT FUCKING ALL). However it's not. Hence the court cases that made federal marriage legal.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)One more time:
He opposed allowing the feds to overturn states who had passed same sex legislation.
Game over.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And they don't give a shit which excuse a politician used. They all had one.
What they give a shit about is him now claiming he was some sort of champion for us when he really didn't give a shit about our issues beyond saying yea or nay twice.
As I said, I imagine it's the same way AA people feel about his MLK bullshit.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Because you don't speak for all lgbt people and it's obvious that you're just going to keep making up stories no matter how times you're caught.
Hilarious.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)you're in the Religion Group, doesn't it? Endless claims that someone said something, but they can never link to an actual quote, and finally come down to something like "I don't care what was actually said, this is my story and I'm sticking to it!"
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)They just make it up as they go along, linking to the same debunked sources like that proves they're telling the truth.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Hillary is the one who paid lip service to lgbt rights while opposing marriage equality.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I didn't need to watch the video.
Your hero never picked up the phone when LGBT groups called. That is a fact. Deal with it.
http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4550754/sanders-opposed-federal-marriage-equality-2006
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)And he was right, it wouldn't have passed.
Here's the video transcript:
He opposed allowing the feds to overturn states who had passed same sex legislation.
He also said to Rachel:
"The state was torn in a way that I had never seen the state torn," Sanders noted of the political climate after Vermont became the first state in the nation to pass civil unions. "My view was, give us a little bit of time."
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Or you know he didn't do shit. Strong supporter my ass. Words. Nothing else. Mr fucking states rights never did shit for us.
That is why he does not know the name of the largest LGBT political organization in the country. Why none of its executive directors ever met him. And why they did not endorse him.
If you were there as you claim, tell me, what other political figures we're at the meetings regarding the fight against the anti-marriage amendment? Prove your claim. I'll wait.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Your ...whatever it was you were involved with is irrelevant to the truth, the facts speak for themselves.
He never opposed marriage equality.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)But never forget we are inferior and must let them edumakate us.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Go ahead, I'll wait.
R B Garr
(16,953 posts)doesn't mean that all meaning is lost. It's been explained over and over so you obviously have other motives besides understanding.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)They make me crazy sometimes.
jfern
(5,204 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)why is that BMUS? Why leave that part out?
We all know why.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)What were his exact words?
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]Even after being provided proof over and over again.
Slandering Bernie Sanders, who has voted repeatedly to protect the LGBTQ community, by knowingly misquoting him and misrepresenting his intentions?
That is the type of behavior worthy of the worst of politics. How you live with yourself I will never know.[/font]
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)You guys never learn.
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)Response to MaggieD (Reply #124)
LostOne4Ever This message was self-deleted by its author.
shadowandblossom
(718 posts)Star Member MaggieD (6,821 posts)
102. Q: Will you support Federal marriage rights?
A: I believe marriage is a states rights issue.
In others words no, he did not support federal marriage rights. Now, as a straight person you may wish to think that is supporting LGBT marriage rights (because you don't understand this issue AT FUCKING ALL). However it's not. Hence the court cases that made federal marriage legal.
No Bernie was not a "champion" of LGBT rights. http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/10/05/bernie_sanders_on_marriage_equality_he_s_no_longtime_champion.html
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]
By the way, at no point in the article you linked does it ever put things in a Q&A format nor does it ever say "I believe marriage is a states rights issue."
Nor did Bernie say that in the C-Span Video within the article. From BMUS post:[/font]
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1528352
He opposed allowing the feds to overturn states who had passed same sex legislation.
[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]And just for the record, I am an aromantic Asexual (two of the orientations represented by the A in LGBTQIA), not straight myself.
I find it infuriating that people would try and slander one of the very very few people who was brave enough to vote against DOMA back in the 1990's.[/font]
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 19, 2016, 11:56 AM - Edit history (1)
That's a tactic Karl Rove would be proud of.
Here is what he actually said:
So yes, Bernie supported marriage equality, that quote was him saying he didn't want the feds overturning states' decisions to legalize same sex marriage.
It doesn't matter who posts the facts, gay, straight, male or female, but in this case it does look like people who "bernplain" are the only ones who are telling the truth.
jfern
(5,204 posts)They tried to pass it that year.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)They keep trying to twist his words, it's obvious what he meant.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts).... Who thinks lecturing us "Stockholm syndrome" victims makes you progressive.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)No one here said anything about Stockholm syndrome.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Stop embarrassing yourself by trying to straight 'splain my life to me. Just stop.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Whenever you can't bullshit your way out of the hole you dug you insult people.
It's quite amusing to watch because it signals that you've lost the battle.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And be grateful I didn't slip and call you Willy.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I get it, you're embarrassed, I would be too if I were you.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Really. Just have some shame and stop.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)And facts are facts no matter who posts them.
Keep digging though, maybe you'll find a way out of the hole you dug.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)you lost.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]But I bet she thinks if she lies enough it will magically become true...[/font]
840high
(17,196 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)No one is buying into your delusions of grandeur.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)You should be embarrassed!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)BERNIE:
HILLARY:
GTFO with this nonsense...You KNOW better.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Turning away a BLM woman who asks questions. If this is all you have.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)The one where she lied about what Hillary said 20 years ago? If you mean that one I believe that Hillary did invite her to gave a conversation, but that clearly wasn't the actual objective of Cornell West's crony.
I have a photo of her and cornell together before that event ever happened
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)LexVegas
(6,060 posts)John Poet
(2,510 posts)William769
(55,147 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)GO imperious JERK !!!!
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I have asked the pols I know why they don't support him. I am sorry to say most think he's a jerk.
4nic8em
(482 posts)seems to take a "bullish" disregard for facts (other threads as well). i humbly suggest that it might be beneficial to you if you took a couple minutes to seek out a hug from your significant other...perhaps it may take the "edge" off. It works for me...hope it does for you too.
shadowandblossom
(718 posts)I don't think I could do it.
4nic8em
(482 posts)With all due respect... First, she misconstrues facts (constantly)...Second, she gets called out for it (often)...Third, she deflects and pivots (always). However, in all fairness I do have to admit she's pretty good at it and she is (at the least) entertaining.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)He lost it.
I think he knows he is loosing and the stress is getting to him.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)I think that when they ask for media coverage, they mean "give him all the time he wants to talk, but don't question him".
He wants the media coverage on him to be like his rallies, where only he gets to talk.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)wildeyed
(11,243 posts)This is the video the article linked. http://www.12news.com/news/bernie-sanders-walks-out-of-interview/88844882
It is a news site, nothing to do with Clinton. Unless you have a link that proves otherwise, seems like you are the one swiftboating when you post misleading comments like this one....
For the record, I think this Jane Sanders/Arpaio thing is way overblown, and I understand why it makes him mad. BUT he is running for president. There are going to be tough questions. People will go after your spouse, and in the Southwest, immigration policy is going to be dissected. He didn't handle the pressure well. Surprised his handlers didn't do a better job prepping him for that.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)anything. I fear for the safety of Sen Sanders and his family. I do not understand people calling themselves Democrats siding with the Rich and Super-Rich and turning their backs on the 99%.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)your original statement. Again, how was the tape edited? It was one long take. Do you have a link to prove your previous assertion? If not, you need to take back the "swift boating" comment.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Let's see- who usually uses that argument to deny certain groups rights
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Bernie argued the opposite, he voted against DOMA because he believed that states should be allowed to pass same sex marriage legislation and the feds shouldn't be able to prevent them from doing so:
Bernie Sanders 2006
senseandsensibility
(17,034 posts)if not,
synergie
(1,901 posts)accusing Hillary of, are demonstrated by BS. That "likeability" thing everyone keeps talking about is interesting too. The better people get to know Hillary, they more they like her, and the exact opposite is true with Bernie. He's a testy guy and impolite as well when he's challenged. The endorsement and comments of those who have worked with the both of them, be they staff, colleagues, or political opponents speaks to that.
And he's on tape walking away testily (yet again), so why should the reporter not say truthfully what happened?
treestar
(82,383 posts)I did not see that he said that. Does he have a stopwatch? Or an aid pointing to his watch?
zalinda
(5,621 posts)A person (celebrity, politician, or news worthy person) comes into a room that is fully lighted for broadcast. Then each reporter is lined up and has their interview within the time frame of the minutes allowed that reporter. It is the same for video or print reporter, each should have their questions lined up in order of importance because at the end of the time allowed, the interview will be cut off. There is even a person, off camera who is timing it. This is the only way possible for a person to do 20 interviews in a short amount of time.
Yes, Sanders was blunt with Resnik, not only was he was trying to push the interview longer, he also wanted to get a National Enquirer type headline, with the remark that Sanders walked away, when it was obvious that Sanders had more interviews scheduled. Sanders took off the mic, stood up and stretched his legs and then sat down again for the next interview. It was obvious, this Resnik guy thinks this local gig is only a stepping stone to the majors, and he thinks this will get him noticed.
Z